Open-Label Study to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of the Spirair Implant
NCT06163404
Airway Obstruction, Nasal Airway Obstruction
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT Number: NCT06922955
The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical outcomes of the VivAer procedure to functional rhinoplasty and septoplasty surgery for the treatment of nasal airway obstruction (NAO) to establish non-inferiority.
This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.
Notify Me22 year–85 year
All sexes
Observational
Southern Head and Neck Surgery, Alexander City, Alabama, United States
The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical outcomes of the VivAer procedure to functional rhinoplasty and septoplasty surgery for the treatment of nasal airway obstruction (NAO) to establish non-inferiority by using the NOSE scale to evaluate the significance of a patient's nasal obstruction both before and after the procedure for the primary endpoint.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Time frame: 3 months, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months post-procedure.
To evaluate the significance of a patient's nasal obstruction both before and after the procedure for the primary endpoint, this study will use the well-known subjective patient-reported outcome measure, the NOSE Scale. The NOSE Scale is a validated disease-specific health status instrument used by clinicians to measure outcomes of participants treated for nasal obstruction. The NOSE Scale consists of 5 items, each scored using a 5-point Likert scale with a total score range of 0 through 100, where higher scores indicate worse obstruction. Severity of symptoms can be classified as mild (range, 5-25), moderate (range, 30-50), severe (range, 55-75), or extreme (range, 80-100) nasal obstruction, based on responses to the NOSE survey.
Individual participant success (treatment responder) is based on NOSE Scale improvement defined as a ≥ 24 point improvement (decrease) in NOSE Scale score from baseline to the 3-month evaluation.
Time frame: 3 months, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months post-procedure.
The ESS evaluates the self-reported likelihood of dozing or falling asleep in 8 daytime situations with likelihood rated as No Chance (0), Slight (1), Moderate (2), or High Chance (3).
Time frame: 3 months, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months post-procedure.
The SF-12 is one of the most widely used instruments for assessing self-reported health-related quality of life, and has been validated in numerous studies.40 The SF-12 is a general health questionnaire that consists of 12 questions which investigates the patient's perception about their state of health via 8 different dimensions: General health perception - 1 question, Physical health - 2 questions, Limited physical role function - 2 questions, Physical pain - 1 question, Vitality - 1 question, Mental health - 2 questions, Limited emotional role function - 2 questions, and Social functioning - 1 question. Two summary scores are reported from the SF-12 - a mental component score (MCS-12) and a physical component score (PCS-12). Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better physical and mental health functioning. A score above 50 indicates better than average health-related quality of life and scores less than 50 suggest below-average health.41
Time frame: 1 week post procedure
The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) is a unidimensional measure of pain intensity that will be used to measure nasal pain associated with the procedure.39 A VAS is usually a 100-mm long horizontal line with verbal descriptors (word anchors) at each end to express the extremes of the feeling. Scores are obtained by measuring the distance in millimeters from the left origin of the line (0) to the point indicated with a slash placed by the patient to indicate their current level of pain in and around the nose. Results are then assigned a score between 0 and 100.
Time frame: 3 months post procedure.
Assessment of the number of workdays missed within the first month due to the receiving the procedure will be collected.
Time frame: 3 months, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months post-procedure.
Satisfaction with the procedure is measured with a five-question, self-reported survey using a 5-point scale to assess tolerability of the procedure, ease of recovery, change in NAO symptoms, overall satisfaction with the procedure, and recommendation to others.
Time frame: Through study completion, minimum 2 years
Physician and patient reported adverse events will be collected.
Aerin Medical
Industry
A Prospective, Open-label, Multi-center, Non-inferiority Study Comparing VivAer® to Alternative Surgical Procedures to Treat Nasal Airway Obstruction in Patients With Nasal Valve Dysfunction (The CompAer Study).
Acronym: CompAer
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06163404
Airway Obstruction, Nasal Airway Obstruction
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05446714
Airway Obstruction, Congenital Abnormalities
Cairo, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT07574918
Airway Obstruction, Nasal Airway Obstruction
View Trial DetailsNCT05527652
Abnormalities, Multiple, Airway Obstruction
Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
View Trial Details