Peking University Third Hospital
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100191, China
NCT Number: NCT05019001
The efficacy of laminoplasty and laminectomy with fusion for ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament with high occupation rate in the cervical spine is not clear in the literature report so far. This study is designed to further research the difference in efficacy between the two surgical methods.
Looking for future studies?
Notify MeAll sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100191, China
Ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament(OPLL) is a common spinal disease which can lead to neurological dysfunction and its morbidity is related to genetic factors. OPLL is usually found in cervical spine and characterized by hypertrophy and ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament in the rear of the corresponding cervical vertebral body, which can encroach the space in the spinal canal and compress the spinal cord and/or nerve roots of the corresponding segments, resulting in sensory and motor disorders of the limbs as well as visceral autonomic nervous dysfunction, leading to neurological dysfunction and even high paraplegia. It not only causes great harm but also brings heavy economic and spiritual burden to patients and society.
Although the surgical treatments for OPLL include anterior and posterior approach, the anterior approach requires excellent equipment and rich operation experience for surgery doctor. Many articles showed significantly higher complications rate in anterior approach than that of posterior approach. Posterior approach surgery is considered to be one of the effective treatment methods for OPLL in cervical spine. In the posterior approach, there are two commonly recognized surgical procedures, laminoplasty and laminectomy with fusion. The efficacy of laminoplasty and laminectomy with fusion for ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament with high occupation rate in the cervical spine is not clear in the literature report so far. This study is designed to further research the difference in efficacy between the two surgical methods. The purpose of this study is to make patients get the biggest medical benefits and to make a right surgical treatment strategy when doctors treating patients with high occupation rate OPLL in cervical spine.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
A posterior approach surgical method to treat patients with Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament
Another posterior approach surgical method to treat patients with Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament
Time frame: preoperative
Preoperative mJOA score, range from 0 to 17. The higher the score, the less severe the symptoms
Time frame: postoperative at 3 months
Postoperative mJOA score, range from 0 to 17. The higher the score, the less severe the symptoms
Time frame: postoperative at 6 months
Postoperative mJOA score, range from 0 to 17. The higher the score, the less severe the symptoms
Time frame: postoperative at 1 year
Postoperative mJOA score, range from 0 to 17. The higher the score, the less severe the symptoms
Time frame: postoperative at 2 year
Postoperative mJOA score, range from 0 to 17. The higher the score, the less severe the symptoms
Time frame: 3 months after surgery
(Postoperative mJOA score-Preoperative mJOA score)/(17-Preoperative mJOA score)×100%
Time frame: 6 months after surgery
(Postoperative mJOA score-Preoperative mJOA score)/(17-Preoperative mJOA score)×100%
Time frame: 1 year after surgery
(Postoperative mJOA score-Preoperative mJOA score)/(17-Preoperative mJOA score)×100%
Time frame: 2 years after surgery
(Postoperative mJOA score-Preoperative mJOA score)/(17-Preoperative mJOA score)×100%
Time frame: during operation
Operation time during operation
Time frame: during operation
blood loss during operation, parameter is milliliter, which is caculated by anesthetist during operation
Time frame: C5 nerve palsy after operation immediately
Whether patient has deltoid muscle strength decrease after operation. If there is, it means to appear C5 palsy.
Time frame: hematoma after operation immediately
hematoma after operation
Time frame: spinal cord injury after operation immediately
Whether patient has spinal cord injury after operation. If there is, it means to appear sensory and motor impairments of limbs and trunk.
Time frame: preoperation
the movement range of cervical
Time frame: 3 months after surgery
the movement range of cervical
Time frame: 6 months after surgery
the movement range of cervical
Time frame: 1 year after surgery
the movement range of cervical
Time frame: 2 years after surgery
the movement range of cervical
Time frame: 3 months after surgery
Visual Analog Score for pain of neck, range from 0-10, a higher score means more pain
Time frame: 6 months after surgery
Visual Analog Score for pain of neck, range from 0-10, a higher score means more pain
Time frame: 1 year after surgery
Visual Analog Score for pain of neck, range from 0-10, a higher score means more pain
Time frame: 2 years after surgery
Visual Analog Score for pain of neck, range from 0-10, a higher score means more pain
Peking University Third Hospital
Other
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06092138
Bone Diseases, Cervical Disc Herniation
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
View Trial DetailsNCT05006495
Bone Diseases, Cervical Spondylosis With Myelopathy
Seoul, Korea, South Korea
View Trial DetailsNCT04968054
Bone Diseases, Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy
Seoul, South Korea
View Trial DetailsNCT02926391
Bone Disease, Infectious, Bone Diseases
Tours, France
View Trial Details