Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT00784719

A Prospective, Randomized, Placebo and Active Comparator Controlled Study of CP-690,550 in Subjects With Dry Eye.

A prospective, randomized, placebo and active comparator controlled study of CP-690,550 in subjects with dry eye.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 1 / Phase 2

Primary location

Pfizer Investigational Site, Chandler, Arizona, United States

Loading trial locations.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Symptoms of dry eye for at least 6 months.
  • Signs of moderate to severe dry eye

Exclusion criteria

  • Women who are nursing or pregnant
  • Participation in other studies within 30 days of screening visit
  • Ocular disorders that may confound interpretation of study results

Treatment and study plan

CP-690,550

Drug

Ophthalmic topical solution, low dose, dosed at least once/day, 8 weeks

cyclosporine

Drug

Ophthalmic topical solution, 0.05%, dosed at least once/day, 8 weeks

CP-690,550 Vehicle

Drug

Ophthalmic topical solution, dosed at least once/day, 8 weeks

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants With Systemic Adverse Events (AEs)

    Time frame: Baseline up to Week 8

    An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. Systemic AEs are the events which are not localized but occur throughout the systemic circulation.

  2. Percentage of Participants With Ocular Adverse Events (AEs)

    Time frame: Baseline up to Week 8

    An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. Ocular AEs are the events which are localized in the ocular region.

  3. Percentage of Participants With Ocular Tolerability Assessment

    Time frame: Baseline up to Week 8

    Ocular tolerability assessment included evaluation of severity and duration of the 5 symptoms: burning/stinging, blurred vision, ocular discomfort, pain, tearing. Severity was assessed on a 4-point scale, where 0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate and 3=severe. Duration was assessed as immediate (if subsided within 5 minutes [<5 min] after application) or persistent (if continued beyond 5 minutes [>=5 min] after application).

  4. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 10 Millimeter (mm) Schirmer Wetting Score Without Anesthesia at Week 8

    Time frame: Week 8

    Schirmer test without anesthesia: well standardized test used to estimate tear flow stimulated reflexly by insertion of a filter paper strip into the conjunctival sac for 5 min. The length of wetting was recorded to the nearest 0.5 millimeter (mm). If the wetting line was oblique, halfway point was used. Results from study eye are reported. Study eye is the 'worse eye', defined as the eye with worse Schirmer test score without anesthesia score at baseline.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Time to Achieve >= 10mm Schirmer Test Score Without Anesthesia

    Time frame: Baseline through Week 8

    Schirmer test without anesthesia: well standardized test used to estimate tear flow stimulated reflexly by insertion of a filter paper strip into the conjunctival sac for 5 min. The length of wetting was recorded to the nearest 0.5 mm. If the wetting line was oblique, halfway point was used. Results from study eye are reported. Study eye is the 'worse eye', defined as the eye with worse Schirmer test score without anesthesia score at baseline.

  2. Time to Achieve 100 Percent (%) Clearance of Corneal Staining

    Time frame: Baseline through Week 8

    Corneal staining was assessed by instilling sodium fluorescein dye in the eye and after 1 to 2 minutes, observing for corneal staining with the aid of a yellow filter and slit lamp. The cornea was divided into five different zones and each corneal zone was graded independently using a 0 to 3 grading scale; where 0=none, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=severe. Results from study eye were to be reported. Study eye is the 'worse eye', defined as the eye with worse Schirmer test score without anesthesia score at baseline.

  3. Time to Achieve >= 5 Units Decrease in Ocular Comfort Index (OCI) Score

    Time frame: Baseline through Week 8

    OCI: validated questionnaire to measure the frequency and intensity of 6 common dry eye symptoms: dryness, grittiness, stinging, eye tiredness, pain, and itching. It contained 12 questions, each measured on a 7-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (never) to 6 (always/severe). Total score was transformed to range of 0 to 100, higher score indicated more ocular discomfort. Negative change from baseline indicated improvement.

  4. Change From Baseline in Schirmer Wetting Score Without Anesthesia at Week 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 1, 2, 4, 6, 8

    Schirmer test without anesthesia: well standardized test used to estimate tear flow stimulated reflexly by insertion of a filter paper strip into the conjunctival sac for 5 min. The length of wetting was recorded to the nearest 0.5 mm. If the wetting line was oblique, halfway point was used. Results from study eye are reported. Study eye is the 'worse eye', defined as the eye with worse Schirmer test score without anesthesia score at baseline.

  5. Change From Baseline in Schirmer Wetting Score With Anesthesia at Week 8

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 8

    Schirmer test was performed 2 to 3 minutes after 1 drop of proparacaine 0.5% was placed in lower conjunctival fornix and superior bulbar conjunctiva of each eye. It was used to estimate tear flow stimulated reflexly by insertion of a filter paper strip into the conjunctival sac for 5 min. The length of wetting was recorded to the nearest 0.5 mm. If the wetting line was oblique, halfway point was used. Results from study eye are reported. Study eye is the 'worse eye', defined as the eye with worse Schirmer test score without anesthesia score at baseline.

  6. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved >=10 mm Schirmer Wetting Score Without Anesthesia at Week 1, 2, 4 and 6

    Time frame: Week 1, 2, 4, 6

    Schirmer test without anesthesia: well standardized test used to estimate tear flow stimulated reflexly by insertion of a filter paper strip into the conjunctival sac for 5 min. The length of wetting was recorded to the nearest 0.5 mm. If the wetting line was oblique, halfway point was used. Results from study eye are reported. Study eye is the 'worse eye', defined as the eye with worse Schirmer test score without anesthesia score at baseline.

  7. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved >=10 mm Schirmer Wetting Score With Anesthesia at Week 8

    Time frame: Week 8

    Schirmer test was performed 2 to 3 minutes after 1 drop of proparacaine 0.5% was placed in lower conjunctival fornix and superior bulbar conjunctiva of each eye. It was used to estimate tear flow stimulated reflexly by insertion of a filter paper strip into the conjunctival sac for 5 min. The length of wetting was recorded to the nearest 0.5 mm. If the wetting line was oblique, halfway point was used. Results from study eye are reported. Study eye is the 'worse eye', defined as the eye with worse Schirmer test score without anesthesia score at baseline.

  8. Change From Baseline in Corneal Staining Scores at Week 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 1, 2, 4, 6, 8

    Corneal staining was assessed using fluorescein dye, a yellow filter, and a slit lamp. The cornea was divided into 5 different zones. Each corneal zone was graded independently using a 0 to 3 grading scale; where 0=none, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=severe. Sum of scores of each zone led to total score. Total score range: 0 to 15, higher score indicated greater staining. Results from study eye are reported. Study eye is the 'worse eye', defined as the eye with worse Schirmer test score without anesthesia score at baseline.

  9. Percentage of Participants Who Demonstrated 100% Clearance of Corneal Staining

    Time frame: Week 1, 2, 4, 6, 8

    Corneal staining was assessed using fluorescein dye, yellow filter, slit lamp. Cornea was divided into 5 different zones. Each corneal zone was graded independently using 0 to 3 grading scale:0=none, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=severe. Sum of scores of each zone led to total score. Total score range: 0 to 15, higher score indicated greater staining. Results from study eye are reported. Study eye is the 'worse eye', defined as the eye with worse Schirmer test score without anesthesia score at baseline.

  10. Change From Baseline in Interpalpebral Conjunctival Staining Score at Week 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 1, 2, 4, 6, 8

    Interpalpebral conjunctival staining was performed 1 minute following ocular administration of lissamine green dye with aid of slit lamp. Based on Oxford grading system, bulbar conjunctiva was divided into 2 zones: nasal, temporal. Staining were graded using a 6-point scale (0=absent, 5=severe). Total score=sum of 2 zone scores. Total score range: 0 to 10, higher score=higher damage to eyes due to dryness. Negative change from baseline indicated improvement. Results from study eye are reported. Study eye is the eye with worse Schirmer test score without anesthesia score at baseline.

  11. Change From Baseline in Tear Break-up Time (TBUT) at Week 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 1, 2, 4, 6, 8

    TBUT was the time interval between the last complete blink and the first appearance of a dry spot, or disruption in the tear film. It was measured under a slit lamp following instillation of fluorescein dye in the eye using a stopwatch. Results from study eye are reported. Study eye is the 'worse eye', defined as the eye with worse Schirmer test score without anesthesia score at baseline.

  12. Change From Baseline in Ocular Comfort Index (OCI) Score at Week 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 1, 2, 4, 6, 8

    OCI: validated questionnaire to measure the frequency and intensity of 6 common dry eye symptoms: dryness, grittiness, stinging, eye tiredness, pain, and itching. It contains 12 questions, each measured on a 7-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (never) to 6 (always/severe). Total score was transformed to range of 0 to 100, higher score indicated more ocular discomfort. Negative change from baseline indicated improvement.

  13. Percentage of Participants With >= 5 Units Decrease in Total OCI Score

    Time frame: Week 1, 2, 4, 6, 8

    OCI: validated questionnaire to measure the frequency and intensity of 6 common dry eye symptoms: dryness, grittiness, stinging, eye tiredness, pain, and itching. It contains 12 questions, each measured on a 7-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (never) to 6 (always/severe). Total score was transformed to range of 0 to 100, higher score indicated more ocular discomfort.

  14. Change From Baseline in Daily Artificial Tear Use at Week 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 1, 2, 4, 6, 8

    Daily artificial tear use was assessed by collecting data on daily number of drops of artificial tear instilled in the eye using a participant diary. Decrease in daily artificial tear use indicated improvement.

  15. Change From Baseline in Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) Total and Subscale Score at Week 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 1, 2, 4, 6, 8

    OSDI is a validated instrument for ocular surface disease. It has 12 items, each measured on 5-point Likert scale (0=none of the time, 4=all the time). Based on these item scores, a total OSDI score (question 1 [Q1]-Q12) and three subscale scores can be derived: Ocular Symptom (Q1-Q3), Vision-related function (Q4-Q9), and Environmental trigger (Q10-Q12). Each derived score ranges from 0 to 100, with a higher score indicates worse condition.

  16. Percentage of Participants With >= 10 Units Decrease in Total OSDI Score

    Time frame: Week 1, 2, 4, 6, 8

    OSDI is a validated instrument for ocular surface disease. It has 12 items, each has a raw score measured on 5-point Likert scale (0=none of the time, 4=all the time). Based on these item scores, a total OSDI score can be derived which ranges from 0 to 100; a higher score indicates worse ocular disease.

  17. Change From Baseline Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) Raw Score at Week 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 1, 2, 4, 6, 8

    OSDI is a validated instrument for ocular surface disease. It has 12 items, each with a raw score measured on 5-point Likert scale (0=none of the time, 4=all the time).

  18. Change From Baseline in Modified Ocular Comfort Index (mOCI) Raw Scores at Week 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 1, 2, 4, 6, 8

    mOCI consisted of the original 12-item OCI plus additional questions on other dry eye symptoms and their impact to participant's life. Each item was measured on a 7-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (never) to 6 (always/severe). Negative change from baseline indicated improvement.

  19. Change From Baseline in National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire 25-item Score (NEI-VFQ-25) at Week 8

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 8

    NEI-VFQ-25 questionnaire included 25 items based on which overall composite VFQ score and 12 subscales were derived: general health (GH), general vision (GV), ocular pain (OP), near activities (NAct), distance activities (DA), social functioning (SF), mental health (MH), role difficulties (RD), dependency, driving, color vision (CV) and peripheral vision (PV). Response to each question converted to 0-100 score. Each subscale, total score=average of items contributing to score. For each subscale and total score, score range: 0 to 100, higher score=less symptoms/better visual functioning.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Pfizer

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

A Phase I/II Prospective, Randomized, Double Masked, Vehicle And Comparator Controlled, Dose Ranging Study Of CP-690,550 In Subjects With Dry Eye Disease.

Important dates

Study start
2008
Primary completion
2009
Study completion
2009
First posted
Nov 4, 2008
Registry last updated
Apr 9, 2013

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.