Standard of Care IMRT (Photon)
RadiationAs this trial is pragmatic, all treatment will be standard of care.
NCT Number: NCT03561220
This study is a large, prospective, pragmatic, controlled comparison of patient-centric outcomes [quality of life (QOL), toxicity, and disease control] between parallel cohorts of men with prostate cancer treated simultaneously at proton therapy facilities and at geographically similar conventional (photon-based) radiation facilities using intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) techniques.
This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.
Notify Me30 year–85 year
Male
Interventional
Not applicable
University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB), Birmingham, Alabama, United States
This study is a large, prospective, pragmatic, controlled comparison of patient-centric outcomes [quality of life (QOL), toxicity, and disease control] between parallel cohorts of men with prostate cancer treated simultaneously at proton therapy facilities and at geographically similar conventional (photon-based) radiation facilities using intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) techniques. This study includes a pre-specified randomized comparison of standard fractionation and moderate hypofractionation dose schemes within the proton therapy cohort. In addition, subgroup analyses will include a comparison of outcomes by race (Black vs. White), comorbidity score (0 vs. 1+), age (<65 vs. ≥65), fractionation schedule (standard, moderate, ultra-hypofractionation), and prostate cancer aggressiveness (very low and low, intermediate, and high risk) for all objectives.
All interventions will be standard of care (SOC) radiation strategies using either IMRT or proton therapy. All patient-reported QOL, patient-scored and patient-reported toxicity, and disease control assessments will be SOC. Participants will also complete pretreatment surveys regarding demographic data, personal treatment goals, factors affecting treatment decision-making, and sources of information used in treatment selection.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
In addition, because the embedded randomized controlled trial compares fractionation schemes, patients who are receiving pelvic node irradiation may not be enrolled on the randomized controlled trial.
As this trial is pragmatic, all treatment will be standard of care.
As this trial is pragmatic, all treatment will be standard of care.
78.0 Gy (RBE) in 39 fractions
60.0 Gy (RBE) in 20 fractions
Time frame: 2-years after the end of radiation therapy
EPIC assesses the disease-specific aspects of prostate cancer and its therapies and comprises four summary domains (Urinary, Bowel, Sexual and Hormonal). Factor analysis supports dividing the Urinary Domain Summary Score into two distinct Incontinence and Irritative/Obstructive subscales. In addition, each Domain Summary Score has measurable Function Subscale and Bother Subscale components. Response options for each EPIC item form a Likert scale, and multi-item scale scores are components. Response options for each EPIC item form a Likert scale, and multi-item scale scores are transformed linearly to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores representing better HRQOL
Time frame: 2-years after the end of radiation therapy
The NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v5.0 is a descriptive terminology which can be utilized for Adverse Event (AE) reporting. A grading (severity) scale is provided for each AE term.
Time frame: 2-years after the end of radiation therapy
PRO-CTCAE responses are scored from 0 to 4, and there are as yet no standardized scoring rules for how to combine attributes into a single score or how best to analyse PRO-CTCAE data longitudinally. PRO-CTCAE scores for each attribute (frequency, severity and/or interference) should be presented descriptively (e.g. summary statistics or graphical presentations). CTCAE grades for the corresponding time period should be presented in conjunction with PRO-CTCAE scores.
Time frame: 3-years after the end of radiation therapy
Biochemical failure is defined as a sustained rise in PSA of 2 ng/mL or more above the nadir (the lowest PSA level after radiotherapy).
University of Florida
Other
Acronym: COMPPARE
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT00967863
Genital Diseases, Genital Diseases, Male
Angers, France
View Trial DetailsNCT06441994
Genital Diseases, Genital Diseases, Male
Suita, Osaka, Japan
View Trial DetailsNCT00352924
Blood Protein Disorders, Cardiovascular Diseases
Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03957252
Disease, Genital Diseases
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
View Trial Details