Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Nashville, Tennessee, 37212, United States
Location status: Recruiting
NCT Number: NCT06513351
This research project aims to enhance the safety of childbirth by using advanced computer models to predict the risk of postpartum hemorrhage (PPH).
PPH is a significant concern for mothers during and after delivery. Current risk assessment tools are basic and do not adapt to changing conditions. This study will investigate whether a new and recently validated model for predicting PPH, combined with a provider-facing Best Practice Advisory (BPA) regarding currently recommended strategies triggered by an increased predicted risk, can improve perinatal outcomes.
This study will compare the current category based risk assessment tool with a new, enhanced prediction model which calculates risk based on 21 factors, automatically updates as new information becomes available during labor and, if elevated, provides a provider-facing Best Practice Advisory (BPA) recommending consideration of strategies that are institutionally agreed to represent high-quality practice.
Investigators hypothesize that the enhanced care approach will result in improved perinatal outcomes.
The goal of the study is to improve the wellbeing of mothers during childbirth by harnessing the power of modern technology and data analysis.
Interested in participating?
Request InfoFemale
Interventional
Not applicable
Nashville, Tennessee, 37212, United States
Location status: Recruiting
Postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) is a common complication following vaginal or cesarean delivery and contributes significantly to maternal morbidity and mortality in the United States. There are numerous clinical factors which contribute to a patient's risk of developing PPH. Utilization of an evidence-based tool for PPH risk prediction is recommended by national societies and required by the Joint Commission.
Most currently used tools are category based and assign a low, medium, or high risk of hemorrhage. These tools fail to take advantage of the vast amounts of data and computing power available via modern electronic medical records. Predictive modeling and informatics-based solutions could help to modernize PPH risk prediction and improve patient outcomes.
This study proposes to continue standard of care risk assessment for all patients, including those randomized to the intervention arm (ARM B). Those patients in the intervention arm (ARM B) will have an additional risk prediction displayed, which will show the quantitative output from the logistic regression PPH risk prediction model, (validated in a previous study). In addition to this display, patients above a preset threshold of 3% risk will have a Best Practice Advisory (BPA) deployed to clinicians with recommended actions. These recommended actions, including the prophylactic use of tranexamic acid and second-line uterotonics, are supported by best evidence in those patients deemed to be at elevated a priori risk of PPH. These prophylactic treatments are accepted standard of care for those patients deemed high risk, and may be administered, at the discretion of the covering clinician, to patients rated high risk by the current risk assessment tool in the comparator arm (Arm A) of the study. The recommendations within the best practice advisory serve as a reminder of best practices as defined by the department and providers are not forced to follow the recommendations of the best practice advisory.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Patients in this group will receive the standard care risk assessment with the addition of a recently developed, novel PPH risk prediction model, which will automatically calculate a patient's numerical risk of hemorrhage based on 21 risk factors. Elevated risk of hemorrhage (>=3% predicted risk), as predicted by the model, will be linked to clinical decision support, including a best practice advisory with recommendations presented to providers for consideration when they access the patient's electronic health record.
Time frame: Date of randomization to Postpartum hospital discharge (usually 2-4 days)
Patients will be assigned the most severe morbidity and mortality outcome score based on a range of criteria from 1 to 7 with 1 being the least severe and 7 being the most severe outcome. 1 is Estimated blood loss <1000 mL, 2 is Estimated blood loss >=1000 mL, 3 is Mechanical treatment of hemorrhage (uterine tamponade device insertion, uterine compression suture), 4 is Post-delivery red blood cell transfusion, 5 is Uterine artery embolization, 6 is Hysterectomy due to bleeding, and 7 is Death.
For example, a patient who experiences an estimated blood loss >=1000mL and does not experience another more serious outcome would receive a score of 2, whereas a patient who requires a hysterectomy due to bleeding might meet several of the criteria, but would receive a score of 6, as this is the most severe criteria they experience.
Time frame: 30 days postpartum
Patients will be assigned the most severe morbidity and mortality outcome score based on a range of criteria from 1 to 7 with 1 being the least severe and 7 being the most severe outcome. 1 is Estimated blood loss <1000 mL, 2 is Estimated blood loss >=1000 mL, 3 is Mechanical treatment of hemorrhage (uterine tamponade device insertion, uterine compression suture), 4 is Post-delivery red blood cell transfusion, 5 is Uterine artery embolization, 6 is Hysterectomy due to bleeding, and 7 is Death.
For example, a patient who experiences an estimated blood loss >=1000mL and does not experience another more serious outcome would receive a score of 2, whereas a patient who requires a hysterectomy due to bleeding might meet several of the criteria, but would receive a score of 6, as this is the most severe criteria they experience.
Time frame: Date of randomization up to 30 days postpartum
Number of patients with estimated blood loss <1000mL
Time frame: Date of randomization up to 30 days postpartum
Number of patients with estimated blood loss >=1000mL
Time frame: Date of randomization up to 30 days postpartum
Number of patients who required mechanical treatment of hemorrhage (uterine tamponade device insertion, uterine compression suture)
Time frame: Date of randomization up to 30 days postpartum
Number of patients who required post-delivery packed red blood cell transfusion
Time frame: Date of randomization up to 30 days postpartum
Number of patients who required uterine artery embolization
Time frame: Date of randomization up to 30 days postpartum
Number of patients requiring a hysterectomy due to bleeding
Time frame: Date of randomization up to 30 days postpartum
Number of patients who died within 30 days postpartum
Time frame: Date of randomization to Postpartum hospital discharge (usually 2-4 days)
Number of patients who received medication to prevent bleeding
Time frame: Date of randomization to Postpartum hospital discharge (usually 2-4 days)
median and interquartile range for all patients
Time frame: Date of randomization to Postpartum hospital discharge (usually 2-4 days)
median and interquartile range for all patients
Time frame: Date of randomization to Postpartum hospital discharge (usually 2-4 days)
median and interquartile range for all patients
Time frame: Date of randomization up to 30 days postpartum
Number of patients who experienced an acute myocardial infarction
Time frame: Date of randomization up to 30 days postpartum
Number of patients who experienced an aneurysm
Time frame: Date of randomization up to 30 days postpartum
Number of patients who experienced acute renal failure
Time frame: Date of randomization up to 30 days postpartum
Number of patients who experienced acute respiratory distress syndrome
Time frame: Date of randomization up to 30 days postpartum
Number of patients who experienced amniotic fluid embolism
Time frame: Date of randomization up to 30 days postpartum
Number of patients who experienced cardiac arrest/ventricular fibrillation
Time frame: Date of randomization up to 30 days postpartum
Number of patients who required conversion of cardiac rhythm
Time frame: Date of randomization up to 30 days postpartum
Number of patients who experienced disseminated intravascular coagulation
Time frame: Date of randomization up to 30 days postpartum
Number of patients who required a blood transfusion
Time frame: Date of randomization up to 30 days postpartum
Number of patients who experienced eclampsia
Time frame: Date of randomization up to 30 days postpartum
Number of patients who experienced heart failure/arrest during surgery or procedure
Time frame: Date of randomization up to 30 days postpartum
Number of patients who experienced puerperal cerebrovascular disorders
Time frame: Date of randomization up to 30 days postpartum
Number of patients who experienced pulmonary edema/acute heart failure
Time frame: Date of randomization up to 30 days postpartum
Number of patients who experienced severe anesthesia complications
Time frame: Date of randomization up to 30 days postpartum
Number of patients who experienced sepsis
Time frame: Date of randomization up to 30 days postpartum
Number of patients who experienced shock
Time frame: Date of randomization up to 30 days postpartum
Number of patients who experienced sickle cell disease with crisis
Time frame: Date of randomization up to 30 days postpartum
Number of patients who experienced air and thrombotic embolism
Time frame: Date of randomization up to 30 days postpartum
Number of patients who required a hysterectomy
Time frame: Date of randomization up to 30 days postpartum
Number of patients who required a temporary tracheostomy
Time frame: Date of randomization up to 30 days postpartum
Number of patients who required ventilation
Time frame: Date of randomization up to 30 days postpartum
Number of patients who required ICU admission following delivery
Time frame: Date of randomization to Postpartum hospital discharge (usually 2-4 days)
Time from delivery to entry into the operating room for dilation and curettage, or operative repair of vaginal/cervical laceration
Time frame: 1 minute post-delivery
The median and interquartile range of the APGAR score will be reported for all patients. The Apgar score is a method to quickly summarize the health of newborn children. The Apgar score is determined by evaluating the newborn baby on five simple criteria: appearance (skin color), pulse (heart rate), grimace (reflex irritability), activity (muscle tone) and respiration on a scale from 0 to 2. Apgar total score (obtained by summing up values from all five items) ranges from 0 to 10 with a score of 0 expressing the worst neonatal status and a score of 10 the best status.
Time frame: 5 minutes post-delivery
The median and interquartile range of the APGAR score will be reported for all patients. The Apgar score is a method to quickly summarize the health of newborn children. The Apgar score is determined by evaluating the newborn baby on five simple criteria: appearance (skin color), pulse (heart rate), grimace (reflex irritability), activity (muscle tone) and respiration on a scale from 0 to 2. Apgar total score (obtained by summing up values from all five items) ranges from 0 to 10 with a score of 0 expressing the worst neonatal status and a score of 10 the best status.
Time frame: 10 minutes post-delivery
The median and interquartile range of the APGAR score will be reported for all patients. The Apgar score is a method to quickly summarize the health of newborn children. The Apgar score is determined by evaluating the newborn baby on five simple criteria: appearance (skin color), pulse (heart rate), grimace (reflex irritability), activity (muscle tone) and respiration on a scale from 0 to 2. Apgar total score (obtained by summing up values from all five items) ranges from 0 to 10 with a score of 0 expressing the worst neonatal status and a score of 10 the best status.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Holly Ende, MD
CONTACT
Tracie Baker, CCRP
CONTACT
Holly Ende
Other
Logistic Regression Prediction Model vs. Standard of Care for Prediction of Postpartum Hemorrhage - A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05488457
Blood Loss, Cesarean Section Complications
Stanford, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05977686
Anemia of Pregnancy, Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06333340
Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications, Hemorrhage
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
View Trial DetailsNCT05370820
Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications, Hemorrhage
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States
View Trial Details