Clinical Laboratory Evaluation of Chronic Autonomic Failure
NCT03648905
Autonomic Failure, Autonomic Nervous System Diseases
Bethesda, Maryland, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT Number: NCT01747655
Patients with advanced Parkinson's Disease experience a range in the severity of their motor fluctuations. The rationale for this Post Marketing Observational Study is to demonstrate the benefits of Duodopa treatment on Parkinson's Disease patients entering the advanced stage of the disease whose motor fluctuations have become troublesome and complicate management with oral therapy. The aim of this post-marketing observational study is to assess the effect of Duodopa treatment on activities of daily living in advanced Parkinson's Disease participants characterised by either 2-4 hours of "off" time or 2 hours of non-troublesome or troublesome dyskinesia daily, supported by a Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Total Score in the best "on" state of at least 40 points at baseline.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Observational
Data are recorded from visits most closely aligned with the planned periods of Visit 0 (V0): Baseline (After decision to use the temporary naso-duodenal tube (approximately 2-14 days) and after signature of the Patient Authorization/Informed Consent Form); Visit 1 (V1): At discharge from hospital; Visit 2 (V2): 3 months after discharge; Visit 3 (V3): 6 months after discharge; Visit 4 (V4): 12 months after discharge.
All participants have a temporary naso-duodenal tube used initially with the infusion pump to determine if the participant responds favorably to this method of treatment and to optimize the dose of Duodopa before permanent treatment is started.
Participants who choose a treatment other than Duodopa after the temporary naso-duodenal test phase are considered for the Standard of Care group. Participants who go on to select Apomorphine pump or Deep Brain Stimulation at any stage are not eligible to continue in this group or to continue in the observational period of study.
Participants who continue to with Duodopa treatment after the the temporary naso-duodenal test phase are the Duodopa group.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and 12 months after hospital discharge
The UPDRS is an Investigator-used rating tool to follow the longitudinal course of Parkinson's disease. The Part II score is the sum of the answers to 13 questions, each of which are measured on a 5-point scale (0-4). The Part II score ranges from 0-52 and higher scores are associated with more disability. UPDRS scores during "On" time (when PD symptoms are well controlled by the drug) are presented. Last observation carried forward (LOCF) was used for missing data.
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and 3, 6, and 12 months after hospital discharge
The UPDRS is an Investigator-used rating tool to follow the longitudinal course of Parkinson's disease. The Part II score is the sum of the answers to 13 questions, each of which are measured on a 5-point scale (0-4). The Part II score ranges from 0-52 and higher scores are associated with more disability. UPDRS scores during "On" time (when PD symptoms are well controlled by the drug) are presented. n=the number of participants with data at baseline and given time point.
Time frame: 14 days
The percentage of participants who continued with PEG-J treatment after treatment via temporary naso-jejunal tube.
Time frame: 12 months
The primary reasons for stopping treatment with Duodopa or for discontinuing the study.
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and 3, 6, and 12 months after hospital discharge
The UPDRS IV questionnaire consists of 4 individual items that assess the degree of dyskinesias (Item 32: duration; Item 33: disability; and Item 34: pain) and clinical fluctuations (Item 39: percentage of "off" times of the waking day). Individual UPDRS IV item scores range from 0 to 4. Higher scores indicate a higher complication of therapy. Observed values are presented for each visit as well as LOCF at 12 months after discharge. n=the number of participants with data at baseline and given time point.
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and 3, 6, and 12 months after hospital discharge
The UPDRS IV questionnaire consists of 4 individual items that assess the degree of dyskinesias (Item 32: duration; Item 33: disability; and Item 34: pain) and clinical fluctuations (Item 39: percentage of "off" times of the waking day). Individual UPDRS IV item scores range from 0 to 4. Higher scores indicate a higher complication of therapy. Observed values are presented for each visit as well as LOCF at 12 months after discharge. n=the number of participants with data at baseline and given time point.
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and 3, 6, and 12 months after hospital discharge
The UPDRS IV questionnaire consists of 4 individual items that assess the degree of dyskinesias (Item 32: duration; Item 33: disability; and Item 34: pain) and clinical fluctuations (Item 39: percentage of "off" times of the waking day). Individual UPDRS IV item scores range from 0 to 4. Higher scores indicate a higher complication of therapy. Observed values are presented for each visit as well as LOCF at 12 months after discharge. n=the number of participants with data at baseline and given time point.
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and 3, 6, and 12 months after hospital discharge
The UPDRS IV questionnaire consists of 4 individual items that assess the degree of dyskinesias (Item 32: duration; Item 33: disability; and Item 34: pain) and clinical fluctuations (Item 39: percentage of "off" times of the waking day). Individual UPDRS IV item scores range from 0 to 4. Higher scores indicate a higher complication of therapy. Observed values are presented for each visit as well as LOCF at 12 months after discharge. n=the number of participants with data at baseline and given time point.
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and 3, 6, and 12 months after hospital discharge
The UPDRS III questionnaire consists of 14 questions on motor examinations rated from 0 (absent/normal) to 4 (extreme impairment). Questions 20-26 are multi-part questions in that they are evaluated separately for multiple body parts (for example, for the left and right hand). Counting each of these assessments leads to a total of 27 answers. The UPDRS III score ranges from 0 to 108 with higher values indicating greater impairment and was calculated as the sum of the 27 answers provided to the 14 questions. Observed values are presented for each visit as well as LOCF at 12 months after discharge. n=the number of participants with data at baseline and given time point.
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and 3, 6, and 12 months after hospital discharge
Non-motor symptoms assessed over the previous month were scored with respect to severity (0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe) and with respect to frequency (1 = rarely, 2 = often, 3 = frequent, 4 = very frequent). The total NMSS score ranges from 0 to 360 with higher values indicating greater impairment and was calculated as the sum of all individual score values. Observed values are presented for each visit as well as LOCF at 12 months after discharge. n=the number of participants with data at baseline and given time point.
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), at discharge from hospital, and 3, 6, and 12 months after hospital discharge
Participants were asked to state how often they had encountered certain problems over the past four weeks using the following rating scale: Never (0), occasionally (1), sometimes (2), often (3), always or cannot do at all (4). The PDQ-8 summary index was derived as the sum of the single items divided by 32. Scores range from 0 to 100. A higher summary index score indicates a higher impairment of quality of life. Observed values are presented for each visit as well as LOCF at 12 months after discharge. n=the number of participants with data at baseline and given time point.
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and 3, 6, and 12 months after hospital discharge
Participants were asked about their utilization of healthcare resources within the previous 3 months, including total number of office visits, total number of visits at home for Parkinson's disease, total number of emergency situations (overnight hospital stay, visit at emergency room, calls for immediate assistance [family/friend)], and calls to 911/emergency), received assistance at home (family/friend or paid caregiver), and falls. n=the number of participants with data at baseline and given time point.
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and 3, 6, and 12 months after hospital discharge
Participants were asked about their utilization of healthcare resources within the previous 3 months, including total number of office visits, total number of visits at home for Parkinson's disease, total number of emergency situations (overnight hospital stay, visit at emergency room, calls for immediate assistance [family/friend)], and calls to 911/emergency), received assistance at home (family/friend or paid caregiver), and falls. n=the number of participants with data at baseline and given time point.
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and 3, 6, and 12 months after hospital discharge
Participants were asked about their utilization of healthcare resources within the previous 3 months, including total number of office visits, total number of visits at home for Parkinson's disease, total number of emergency situations (overnight hospital stay, visit at emergency room, calls for immediate assistance [family/friend)], and calls to 911/emergency), received assistance at home (family/friend or paid caregiver), and falls. n=the number of participants with data at given time point.
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and 3, 6, and 12 months after hospital discharge
Participants were asked about their utilization of healthcare resources within the previous 3 months, including total number of office visits, total number of visits at home for Parkinson's disease, total number of emergency situations (overnight hospital stay, visit at emergency room, calls for immediate assistance [family/friend)], and calls to 911/emergency), received assistance at home (family/friend or paid caregiver), and falls. n=the number of participants with data at given time point.
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and 3, 6, and 12 months after hospital discharge
Participants were asked about their utilization of healthcare resources within the previous 3 months , including total number of office visits, total number of visits at home for Parkinson's disease, total number of emergency situations (overnight hospital stay, visit at emergency room, calls for immediate assistance [family/friend)], and calls to 911/emergency), received assistance at home (family/friend or paid caregiver), and falls. n=the number of participants with data at baseline and given time point.
AbbVie (prior sponsor, Abbott)
Industry
A Post Marketing Observational Study of Activities of Daily Living in Advanced Parkinson's Disease Patients With Early Troublesome Motor Fluctuations and Treated With Duodopa - a Multi-country Study - MONOTREAT
Acronym: MONOTREAT
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03648905
Autonomic Failure, Autonomic Nervous System Diseases
Bethesda, Maryland, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT01621581
Basal Ganglia Diseases, Brain Diseases
Bethesda, Maryland, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05699460
Autonomic Nervous System Diseases, Basal Ganglia Diseases
Irvine, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07720869
Basal Ganglia Diseases, Brain Diseases
Baton Rouge, Louisiana, United States
View Trial Details