Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT06578897

A Post-Market, Retrospective Study on 3D Metal Tibial and Femoral Cones

GMK Revision Knee System is part of the Medacta GMK® (Global Medacta Knee) Total Knee System and is indicated when a higher level of varus/valgus constraint is needed. The external shape of the GMK® Revision femoral component is identical to that of GMK® Primary. The GMK® Revision differs from GMK® Primary by three important design features:

i. The addition of a box which allows a stem to be inserted into the femoral canal; ii. The addition of screw lugs so that augments can be placed on the distal and posterior resections, and; iii. The box which also allows various levels of constraint to be added to the polyethylene insert. The tibial component offers the ability to place augments.

Indications for Use:

The GMK® Total Knee System is designed for cemented use in total knee arthroplasty if there is evidence of sufficient sound bone to seat and support the components.

This knee replacement system is indicated in the following cases:

* Severely painful and/or disabled joint as a result of arthritis, traumatic arthritis, rheumatoid arthritis or polyarthritis * Avascular necrosis of femoral condyle * Post traumatic loss of joint configuration * Primary implantation failure * Ligamentous Instability

Tibial augments are to be attached to the tibial baseplate with both the fixing cylinders and bone cement. In case a semi-constrained liner is used, an extension stem must be implanted both on the tibial and on the femoral component.

GMK® Revision femoral components are manufactured of Cobalt Chromium Molybdenum (CoCrMo) according to ISO 5832-4:1996, Implants for Surgery- Metallic materials - Part 4: Cobalt-Chromium-Molybdenum Casting Alloy, the same as the GMK® Primary femoral components. They have an asymmetric patellar groove (left and right) with different radii of curvature in coronal plane as well as non-parallel anterior and posterior cuts (wedge shape). The GMK® Revision posterior stabilized femoral components are designed for use without cruciate ligaments when additional stability is required to prevent subluxation of the femur to the tibia in flexion, same as the GMK® Primary femoral components.

In case of severe bone loss, the tibial cones and femoral cones may be used to respectively reinforce the proximal tibia cavity and the distal femoral cavity, providing structural support and load redistribution on the remaining bone. Being an integral part of revision TKA for patients with such bone loss, the clinical outcomes for revision TKAs using the cone components are important for the knowledge regarding performance and survivorship of the Revision TKA as a whole.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

Northwestern

Chicago, Illinois, 60611, United States

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Subjects underwent revision total knee replacement for any type of etiology (Osteoarthritis, Avascular necrosis, Rheumatoid Arthritis, Post-traumatic Arthritis, Polyarthritis, Primary implantation failure, Infection, Ligamentous Instability)
  • Subjects must have received a Medacta GMK Revision component using 3D metal tibial and femoral cones
  • Must be at minimum 1 year (12 months) post-treatment
  • No age limit criteria

Exclusion criteria

  • Subjects with neuromuscular or neurosensory deficiency, which would limit the ability to assess the performance of the device
  • Subjects that were incarcerated at the time of surgery.
  • History of alcoholism
  • On chemotherapy or radiation therapy during the time of interest
  • Habitual use of narcotic pain medications prior to surgery or after surgery for reasons other than knee pain
  • History of a metabolic disorder affecting the skeletal system other than osteoarthritis or osteoporosis
  • History of chronic pain issues for reasons other than knee pain
  • Progressive local or systemic infection during time of interest
  • Muscular loss, neuromuscular disease, or vascular deficiency of the affected limb
  • Obesity or excessive weight of subject

Treatment and study plan

3D Metal Tibial and Femoral cones

Device
  • To collect retrospective clinical outcomes and data on revision TKAs using Medacta GMK Revision with 3D metal tibial and femoral cones
  • Evaluate the patient reported functionality of the operated knee
  • Evaluate the clinical and radiological performance
  • Evaluate safety of the cones
  • Evaluate survivorship of revisions using tibial and femoral cones

Primary outcomes

  1. To collect retrospective clinical outcomes and data on revision TKAs using Medacta GMK Revision with 3D metal tibial and femoral cones

    Time frame: 1 year

    Oxford Knee Score (OKS) is a 12-item patient-reported PRO specifically designed and developed to assess function and pain after total knee replacement (TKR) surgery (arthroplasty).

    The overall score for the OKS is acquired by simply summing the scores received for individual questions. This results in a continuous score ranging from 0 (most severe symptoms/problems) to 48 (least severe).

  2. To collect retrospective clinical outcomes and data on revision TKAs using Medacta GMK Revision with 3D metal tibial and femoral cones

    Time frame: 1 year

    Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) is a 12-question patient-reported outcomes measure created to measure a patient's awareness of their artificial joint.

    The FJS responses "never," "almost never," "seldom," "sometimes," and "mostly" translate into a 5-point Likert-response format translated linearly into a summative range from 0 to 100 scale with high values translating to the patient successfully "forgetting" about their joint during activities of daily living

  3. To collect retrospective clinical outcomes and data on revision TKAs using Medacta GMK Revision with 3D metal tibial and femoral cones

    Time frame: 1 year

    Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) s a knee-specific instrument, developed to assess the patients' opinion about their knee and associated problems. The KOOS evaluates both short-term and long-term consequences of knee injury.

    Scores are transformed to a 0-100 scale, with zero representing extreme knee problems and 100 representing no knee problems as common in orthopaedic scales and generic measures.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Evaluate the clinical and radiological performance

    Time frame: 1 year

    standard x-ray exam performed preoperatively and postoperatively before discharge from hospital and during follow-up visits

  2. Evaluate safety of the cones

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year

    Any complication occurred during the study

  3. Evaluate survivorship of revisions using tibial and femoral cones

    Time frame: 1 year

    % survival rate

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Medacta International SA

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

A Post-Market, Retrospective Study to Collect Clinical Outcomes From Patients Who Have Undergone Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty Using Medacta GMK Revision With 3D Metal Tibial and Femoral Cones.

Important dates

Study start
2024
Primary completion
2025
Study completion
2025
First posted
Aug 30, 2024
Registry last updated
Sep 29, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.