Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT06968351

A Pilot Study on Animal-Assisted Intervention in Correctional Settings

Mental health concerns such as depression, anxiety, and post-traumatic stress are particularly prevalent among incarcerated individuals and are considered risk factors for recidivism. Leveraging the natural human-animal bond, animal-assisted intervention (AAI) offers a less threatening alternative to engage incarcerated individuals and address their mental health needs. As an initial effort to help promote rehabilitative security in Hong Kong, the current study examines the acceptability and effectiveness of a brief animal-assisted program among offenders in local secured facilities.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Hong Kong Correctional Services Department

Hong Kong, 00000

Location status: Recruiting

Location contact

Senior Clinical Psychologist (PSS1)

CONTACT

[email protected]

+852-25981936

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • persons-in-custody
  • aged 18 or older
  • understand Cantonese

Exclusion criteria

  • an allergy, a fear, or a dislike toward dogs
  • a history of aggression toward animals
  • a criminal history involving animals
  • a history of neurodevelopmental disorders
  • active psychosis or mania
  • active suicidality

Treatment and study plan

animal-assisted intervention

Behavioral

A brief animal-assisted intervention is offered on a group basis across four sessions. Each session lasts approximately 60 minutes and covers the same themes but through different exercises. These themes include effective communication, behavioral principles, problem-solving, and teamwork. The first part of a session involves learning to give effective single-component commands to a rehabilitative dog under the guidance of a professional dog handler. The second part of a session involves the applications of two or more of these single-component commands to an interactive group activity. Project staff are present at each session to facilitate discussions among participants on any challenges encountered, learning, and intra- as well as inter-personal experiences during the session.

Other names: AAI, Dog Therapy

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in common psychopathology as measured with the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale - 21 Items

    Time frame: At the beginning of each sessions, approximately one week after completion of the treatment, and one month after the treatment

    Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale - 21 Items (DASS21; Lovibond & Lovibond, 1995) is a self-report measure of common mental health concerns. The three subscales are each measured with seven items, using a 4-point Likert scale from 0 = Did not apply to me at all to 3 = Applied to me very much or most of the time. Scores are summed for each subscale, with higher scores indicating more severe levels of emotional symptoms.

  2. Change in emotional state as measured with the International Positive and Negative Affect Schedule Short Form

    Time frame: At the beginning and at the end of each session, up to a total of four sessions

    International Positive and Negative Affect Schedule Short Form (I-PANAS-SF; Thompson, 2007) is an adapted version of the PANAS-SF (Watson et al., 1988) and designed specifically for non-English speaking individuals. Using a 5-point Likert scale from 1 = Never to 5 = Always, individuals rate on their experience of five positive affect and five negative affect in the present moment. Scores are summed for each subscale, with higher scores indicating higher levels of positive or negative affect.

  3. Change in heart rate variability

    Time frame: At the beginning and at the end of each session, up to a total of four sessions

    Heart rate data are collected via photoplethysmogram signals and then transformed into heart rate variability with artifacts corrected through automated detection using the Kubios HRV Scientific software (Kubios, 2024).

  4. Change in skin conductance

    Time frame: At the beginning and at the end of each session, up to a total of four sessions

    Both phasic and tonic skin conductance data are captured with a galvanic skin response sensor

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in disciplinary offences and privileges during incarceration

    Time frame: At each session, up to a total of four sessions, and within a week after the treatment

    To track PIC's conduct and interpersonal behaviors during incarceration, official correctional records on disciplinary offences and privileges received in the week prior to each AAI session, including counts and associated behaviors, are collected.

  2. Change in trauma-related psychopathology as measured with the Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for DSM-5

    Time frame: Before treatment, within a week after treatment, and one month after treatment

    The Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5) is a self-report measure of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptom severity, based on its diagnostic criteria in DSM-5 (Blevins et al., 2015). Each of the 20 items is rated on a 5-point Likert scale of 0 = Not at all to 4 = Extremely.

  3. Change in empathy as measured with the Brief Interpersonal Reactivity Index

    Time frame: Before treatment, within a week after treatment, and one month after treatment

    Brief Interpersonal Reactivity Index (B-IRI) measures empathy by four subscales, namely Perspective Taking, Empathic Concern, Fantasy, and Personal Distress. Each subscale is measured by four items, using a 5-point Likert scale from 1 = Does not describe me at all to 5 = Describes me very well and with higher sum scores indicating higher levels in the corresponding aspect of empathy.

  4. Change in self-efficacy as measured with the New General Self-Efficacy Scale

    Time frame: Before treatment, within a week after treatment, and one month after treatment

    New General Self-Efficacy Scale (NGSES) is designed to measure self-efficacy across contexts. Using a 5-point Likert scale from 1 = Strongly disagree to 5 = Strongly agree, individuals rate on a total of eight items about their self-perceived ability to perform across different contexts. Scores are summed across all items, with higher scores indicating greater self-efficacy.

  5. Change in psychological flexibility as measured with the Multidimensional Psychological Flexibility Inventory

    Time frame: Before treatment, within a week after treatment, and one month after treatment

    The Multidimensional Psychological Flexibility Inventory (MPFI; Rolffs et al., 2018) measures an individual's flexibility in responding to difficult experiences. Its short form consists of 12 items, which uses a 6-point Likert scale from 1 = Never True to 6 = Always True, and demonstrates psychometric soundness when used among Chinese (Li, 2024). Scores are summed across items, with higher scores indicate greater level of psychological flexibility.

  6. Change in openness to treatment as measured with the Attitudes Toward Seeking Professional Psychological Help

    Time frame: Before treatment, within a week after treatment, and one month after treatment if feasible

    Attitudes Toward Seeking Professional Psychological Help (ATSPPH) measures an individual's help seeking preferences as indicated by three subscales, namely Openness to seeking professional help, Value in seeking professional help, and Preference to cope on one's own. Its short form contains 10 items, each rated on a 4-point Likert scale from 0 = Disagree to 3 = Agree. Scores are summed across items for each subscale, with higher scores indicating greater levels in each of the measured domains.

  7. Change in social interactions

    Time frame: At each session, up to a total of four sessions, and within a week after the treatment

    Participants' behaviors during each AAI session and across the sessions are rated by independent observers on six items, using 3- to 5-point Likert scales (Koda et al., 2015). These items ask for ratings on a participant's general facial expression in terms of its affective valence, tenderness toward the animal, amount of talking, willingness to have contact with the animal, interest in the animal, and ease of interaction with the animal.

  8. Subjective experience with the treatment

    Time frame: Within a month after the treatment

    Four open-ended questions are used to help understand participants' experience with the AAI descriptively. These items include one on overall psychological wellbeing on the day of measurement, one on feelings toward the animal, one on feelings toward peers in the assigned AAI, and one on overall psychological wellbeing throughout the past week.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

The University of Hong Kong

Other

Collaborators

  • Hong Kong Correctional Services Department

Registry information

Official study title

Animal-Assisted Intervention: An Effectiveness Study Using Qualitative and Quantitative Measures on Offenders With Mental Illnesses in Hong Kong

Important dates

Study start
2025
Primary completion
2025
Study completion
2025
First posted
May 13, 2025
Registry last updated
Aug 1, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.