Retilux
Device670nm wavelength light
Other names: PBM, Photobiomodulation
NCT Number: NCT03866473
Randomized clinical trial evaluating the effect of photobiomodulation compared with sham on central subfield thickness (CST) in eyes with central-involved DME and good vision.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Atlantis Eye Care, Huntington Beach, California, United States
This study is being conducted to assess the effects of photobiomodulation on CST compared with sham in eyes with central-involved DME and good vision. Photobiomodulation is irradiation by light in the 630-900 nanometer region of the spectrum.
Furthermore, this pilot study is being conducted to determine whether the conduct of a pivotal trial has merit based on an anatomic outcome and provide information on outcome measures needed to design a pivotal trial.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Atleast one eye meeting the following criteria:
Exclusion criteria
A participant will be excluded if the study eye meets any of the following criteria:
670nm wavelength light
Other names: PBM, Photobiomodulation
Broad spectrum light device
Time frame: Baseline to 4 months
Only eyes that completed the 4-month visit were included in calculation of descriptive statistics of optical coherence tomography (OCT) data. For eyes that received alternate DME treatment prior to 4 months (N=3 [PBM]; N = 1 [placebo]), the last OCT measurements prior to alternative diabetic macular edema (DME) treatment were used in place of the 4-month measurements. All analyses followed the intent-to-treat principle. Multiple imputation (m = 100) was used for missing values of central subfield thickness and retinal volume change, with imputation models that included variables for treatment group, baseline values, and change from baseline at all monthly interim visits up to the primary outcome visit and the randomization stratification factor of recent or planned intravitreous treatment in the non-study eye. Multiple imputation was not performed for center-involved DME given the thresholds are gender and machine specific.
OCT CST change was truncated to the mean ± 3 SD (13 ± 3 × 5
Time frame: Baseline to 4 months
CST = central subfield thickness, OCT = optical coherence tomography, PBM = photobiomodulation
Time frame: baseline to 4 months
DME = diabetic macular edema, OCT = optical coherence tomography
Time frame: 4 months
Time frame: baseline to 4 months
Visual acuity is measured as a continuous integer letter score from 0 to 100, with higher numbers indicating better visual acuity. A letter score of 85 is approximately 20/20 and a letter score of 70 is approximately 20/40, the legal unrestricted driving limit in most states. A 5-letter change for an individual is approximately equal to a 1-line change on a vision chart. Visual acuity (VA) change truncated to mean ±3 SD (-0.3 ± 3 × 5.3). Eyes that received alternative treatment for DME before primary outcome visit (3 PBM, 1 placebo); last measurements taken before DME treatment was initiated were the pre-specified outcome data. Missing data for eyes that didn't get alternative treatment for DME imputed with multiple imputation.
Time frame: 4 to 8 months
Only eyes that completed the 4-month visit were included in calculation of descriptive statistics of OCT data. For eyes that received alternate DME treatment prior to 4 months (N = 3 [PBM]; N = 1 [placebo]), the last OCT measurements prior to alternative DME treatment were used in place of the 4-month measurements. All analyses followed the intent-to-treat principle. Multiple imputation (m = 100) was used for missing values of central subfield thickness and retinal volume change, with imputation models that included variables for treatment group, baseline values, and change from baseline at all monthly interim visits up to the primary outcome visit and the randomization stratification factor of recent or planned intravitreous treatment in the non-study eye. Multiple imputation was not performed for center-involved DME given the thresholds are gender and machine specific.
OCT CST change was truncated to the mean ± 3 SD (13 ± 3 × 58)
Jaeb Center for Health Research
Other
Acronym: AE
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04516278
Age-Related Macular Degeneration, BRVO - Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion
Tucson, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04772105
Diabetic Macular Edema
Beijiang, Beijing Municipality, China
View Trial DetailsNCT06850922
Diabetic Macular Edema
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04597918
Diabetic Macular Edema
Naples, Florida, United States
View Trial Details