Hanyang University Medical Center
Seoul, South Korea
NCT Number: NCT03147248
This is a Phase I/III Study to Evaluate Efficacy, Pharmacokinetics and Safety between CT-P13 SC and CT-P13 IV in Patients with Active Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA).
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–75 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 3
Seoul, South Korea
A new subcutaneous infliximab formulation is developed by Celltrion, Inc. as an alternative to the intravenous regimen where subcutaneous infliximab injection typically takes less than 2 minutes. The availability of a subcutaneous formulation of infliximab would increase the treatment options available to patients, particularly those wishing to self-administer their therapy. This Phase I/III Study randomized, double-blinded (Part 2 only), multicenter, parallel-group study was designed to evaluate Efficacy, Pharmacokinetics and Safety between Subcutaneous CT-P13 and Intravenous CT-P13 in Patients with Active RA.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
CT-P13 (3 mg/kg) by IV infusion administered as a 2 hour IV infusion per dose every 8 weeks
Other names: Infliximab
Time frame: Weeks 22 (pre-dose to 216 hours post-dose), 24 (14 days after start of administration [SOA] at Week 22), 26 (pre-dose) and 28 (42 days after SOA at Week 22), and Week 30 (pre-dose)
For Part 1, the primary pharmacokinetic (PK) endpoint of the AUCτ (area under the concentration-time curve) at steady state between Week 22 and Week 30 was analyzed in patients who received all doses (full) of study drug up to Week 30 (prior to Week 30) in the PK population. All patients in SC cohorts were randomly assigned at Week 14 in a 1:1 ratio to either Group A or B for PK monitoring visit period (Week 22 and Week 30). Therefore, AUCτ was calculated at Week 22 for Cohort 1: CT-P13 IV 3 mg/kg, Weeks 22 and 26 for Group A of SC cohorts, and Weeks 24 and 28 for Group B of SC cohorts.
Time frame: Week 22
For Part 2, the primary efficacy endpoint was to demonstrate that CT-P13 SC 120 mg is non-inferior to CT-P13 IV 3 mg/kg at Week 22, as determined by clinical response according to mean change from baseline in DAS28 (CRP) at Week 22, using Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA). Change from baseline for ANCOVA was defined as decrease from baseline and calculated as (DAS28 [CRP] at baseline - DAS28 [CRP] at Week 22). DAS28 (CRP) was calculated using the following formula: DAS28 (CRP) equals(=) (0.56 multiplied by [*] the square root [√] of TJC28 [tender joint count]) plus (+) (0.28 * √ of SJC28 [swollen joint count]) + (0.36 * the natural logarithm [ln](CRP [mg/L] + 1)) + (0.014 * patient global disease activity [GH] on visual analogue assessment [VAS]) + 0.96. DAS28 (CRP) provides a number on a scale from 0 to 10 indicating the current activity of patients with RA. DAS28 (CRP) score above 5.1 indicates high disease activity, whereas DAS28 (CRP) score below 3.2 indicates low disease activity.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 2, Week 6, Week 14, Week 22, Week 30, and Week 54
The secondary endpoint was defined as descriptive statistics of actual value in disease activity measured by DAS28 (CRP) up to Week 54. The results up to Week 6 represented the efficacy of CT-P13 IV loading dose (3 mg/kg) regardless of randomized treatment arm (CT-P13 SC or CT-P13 IV) in both treatment arms. DAS28 (CRP) was calculated according to the following formula: DAS28 (CRP) = (0.56* √ of TJC28) + (0.28 * √ of SJC28) + (0.36 * ln(CRP [mg/L] + 1)) + (0.014 * GH on VAS) + 0.96. DAS28 (CRP) provides a number on a scale from 0 to 10 indicating the current activity of the patients with RA. DAS28 (CRP) score above 5.1 indicates high disease activity, whereas DAS28 (CRP) score below 3.2 indicates low disease activity.
Time frame: Week 2, Week 6, Week 14, Week 22, Week 30, and Week 54
The secondary endpoint was defined as number of patients achieving clinical response according to ACR20 (20% response, defined by ACR) between CT-P13 SC and CT-P13 IV groups. The results up to Week 6 represented the efficacy of CT-P13 IV loading dose (3 mg/kg) regardless of randomized treatment arm (CT-P13 SC or CT-P13 IV).
Responder according to the ACR20 criteria defined as, if they are fulfilled, a decrease of at least 20% in number of tender joints and swollen joints (0-28), and 20% improvement in 3 of the followings: patient assessment of pain on VAS (0-100 mm), patient global assessment of disease activity on VAS (0-100 mm) and physician global assessment of disease activity on VAS (0-100 mm), health assessment questionnaire disability index and CRP or ESR (erythrocyte sedimentation rate).
Time frame: SC group: Weeks 0, 2, 12, 20, 22, 24, 26, 28, 36, 44, and 52; IV group: Weeks 0, 2, 6, 14, 22, 36, 44, and 52
For evaluation of pharmacokinetics (PK), the secondary endpoint was defined as the analysis of trough concentration (concentration before the next study drug administration) of Infliximab up to Week 54. The samples were collected at Weeks 0, 2 and 6, and every 8 weeks up to Week 54. During PK monitoring visit (Weeks 22-30), samples were collected every 2 weeks according steady state PK sampling time point. All patients were randomly assigned at Week 14 in a 1:1:1:1 ratio to one of 4 groups (Groups A, B, C or D) for PK monitoring visit period. No PK results were obtained at Weeks 6 and 14 for SC group and Weeks 12, 20, 24, 26 and 28 for IV group due to 2 weeks and 8 weeks dosing interval, respectively.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 2, Week 6, Week 14, Week 22, Week 30, Week 38, Week 46, and Week 54
For evaluation of pharmacodynamic (PD), the secondary endpoint was defined as concentration of CRP between 2 treatment groups up to Week 54. The blood samples for CRP were collected at Weeks 0, 2 and 6, and every 8 weeks up to Week 54.
Patient who received the other treatment than that to which they were assigned at any point was defined as mis-randomized. One patient in IV group was mis-randomized and analyzed as SC group for PD analysis.
Celltrion
Industry
A Randomized, Parallel-Group, Phase I/III Study to Evaluate Efficacy, Pharmacokinetics and Safety Between Subcutaneous CT-P13 and Intravenous CT-P13 in Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03649178
Arthritis, Arthritis, Rheumatoid
Nashville, Tennessee, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03025308
Arthritis, Arthritis, Rheumatoid
Huntsville, Alabama, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07715045
Arthritis, Arthritis, Rheumatoid
Palembang, South Sumatera, Indonesia
View Trial DetailsNCT00055055
Arthritis, Arthritis, Rheumatoid
Bethesda, Maryland, United States
View Trial Details