Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT00383149

A Phase II, Trial of Ixabepilone Plus Cetuximab as First Line Therapy for Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer

The purpose of this clinical research study is to learn if ixabepilone plus cetuximab improves survival when given as 1st line chemotherapy in subjects with metastatic pancreatic cancer compared to historical data. The safety of this combination treatment will also be studied.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 2

Primary location

Georgetn Univ Lombardi Can Ctr, Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States

Loading trial locations.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Histologic or cytologic diagnosis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma (locally advanced disease that is not surgically resectable, or distant metastatic disease)
  • Participants must have measurable disease as per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) guidelines
  • Participants must not have received prior chemotherapy, immunotherapy or chemoradiotherapy for advanced pancreas cancer
  • Karnofsky performance status (KPS) of 70-100
  • Adequate hematologic, hepatic and renal function

Treatment and study plan

ixabepilone

Drug

Intravenous Infusion (IV), 32 mg/m^2 every 21 days.

Other names: IXEMPRA®, Erbitux®, BMS-247550, BMS-564717

Cetuximab

Drug

Initial dose of 400 mg/m^2 intravenous (IV) over 2 hours) followed by a weekly lower dose of 250 mg/m^2 IV over 1 hour.

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants Surviving at 6 Months

    Time frame: From time of first dose of study drug through 6 months

    The percentage of participants surviving at 6 months was defined as the number of treated participants who had not died prior to 6 months from the date of their first dose divided by the total number of treated participants.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Best Overall Tumor Response

    Time frame: From time of first dose of study until 16.49 months (longest period for participant between first dose and documented disease progression)

    Tumor response was assessed according to the Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria: Complete Response (CR)= disappearance of all non-target lesions, Partial Response (PR)= at least 30% reduction in the sum of the longest diameter (LD) of all target lesions in reference to the baseline sum LD; Stable Disease (SD)= neither PR nor progressive disease (PD) criteria were met; PD = at least 20% increase in the sum of the LD of all target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum LD recorded at or following baseline.

  2. Percentage of Participants With Objective Tumor Response

    Time frame: From time of first dose of study until 16.49 months (longest period for participant between first dose and documented disease progression

    Percentage of participants with objective tumor response was determined by the number of participants with PR or CR divided by the total number of response-evaluable participants. Tumor response was assessed according RECIST criteria: PR=at least 30% reduction in the sum of the LD of all target lesions in reference to the baseline sum LD, CR=Disappearance of all non-target lesions.

  3. Median Progression Free Survival Time

    Time frame: From time of first dose of study until 16.49 months (longest period for participant between first dose and documented disease progression

    Progression-Free Survival (PFS) time was defined as the time, in months, from the first dosing date until the date of disease progression or death from any cause.

  4. Median Overall Survival Time

    Time frame: From the first dosing date until death (last reported death was 21 months after first dose).

    Overall survival time was defined as the time in months from the first dosing date to the date of death.

  5. Median Duration of Response

    Time frame: From first date recorded for CR or PR until the first date of disease progression or death (last participant with tumor response progressed 6.5 months after documented response).

    Duration of response was defined as the number of months from when measurement criteria were first met for CR or PR (whichever was recorded first) until the first date of disease progression or death. Complete Response (CR)= disappearance of all non-target lesions, Partial Response (PR)= at least 30% reduction in the sum of the longest diameter (LD) of all target lesions in reference to the baseline sum LD.

  6. Median Time to Response

    Time frame: Time from first dose of study therapy until first date of PR or CR. Maximum time to response was 19 months.

    Time to response was defined as the number of weeks from first dose of study therapy (ixabepilone or cetuximab) until measurement criteria were first met for PR or CR, whichever status was recorded first. Complete Response (CR)= disappearance of all non-target lesions, Partial Response (PR)= at least 30% reduction in the sum of the longest diameter (LD) of all target lesions in reference to the baseline sum LD.

  7. Number of Participants With Death Within 30 Days of Last Dose, Any Serious Adverse Event (SAE), Any Adverse Event (AE) Leading to Discontinuation (DC), or Any Treatment-related AEs By Common Terminology Criteria Version 3.0 (CTC v3) Grade (Gr)

    Time frame: From the time of first dose of study drug to ≤30 days after the end of the last dose of study drug or until resolution of study drug-related toxicity.

    AE=any new untoward medical occurrence or worsening of a pre-existing medical condition not necessarily having a causal relationship with this treatment. SAE=any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization/causes prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, results in development of drug dependency or drug abuse, or is an important medical event.

  8. Number of Participants With Most Common Treatment-related Nonhematologic AE (>25%) By CTC v3 Grade (Gr)

    Time frame: From the time of first dose of study drug to ≤30 days after the end of the last dose of study drug or until resolution of study drug-related toxicity.

    AE=any new untoward medical occurrence or worsening of a pre-existing medical condition not necessarily having a causal relationship with this treatment. Acneform rash and peripheral neuropathy were captured by multiple MedDRA preferred terms. Acneform rash included rash, rash pustular, and rash pruritic preferred terms. Peripheral neuropathy included neuromuscular toxicity, peripheral motor neuropathy, and peripheral sensorimotor neuropathy preferred terms.

  9. Number of Participants With Hematology, Liver Function, and Renal Laboratory Abnormalities By CTC v3 Grade (Gr)

    Time frame: From the time of first dose of study drug to ≤30 days after the end of the last dose of study drug or until resolution of study drug-related toxicity.

    Laboratory results were graded according to CTC v 3.0. Hematology laboratory evaluations included absolute neutrophil count (ANC), white blood cell count (WBC), platelets (PLT), and hemoglobin (HGB). Liver function laboratory evaluations included alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alkaline phosphatase, and total bilirubin. Renal function laboratory evaluation included creatinine.

  10. Number of Participants With Dose Reduction, Dose Delay, or Dose Interruption

    Time frame: From the first dosing date of Cycle 1 until the last dosing date of the last cycle. Last dosing cycle for a participant was Cycle 21.

    Dose reduction of ixabepilone and/or cetuximab due to toxicity was permitted for participants deriving benefit from therapy. Each drug could be dose modified independently of the others. Participants unable to start a cycle due to unacceptable toxicity related to ixabepilone or cetuximab could have therapy delayed for up to 4 weeks. If toxicities prevented the administration of ixabepilone or cetuximab therapy, participants continued receiving the other therapy as scheduled. A dose interruption for ixabepilone or cetuximab was defined as any interruption during the infusion period.

  11. Percentage of Participants With Baseline Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) Tumor Expression

    Time frame: Baseline

    EGFR expression was evaluated by means of an immunohistochemical assay using tumor tissue collected prior to receiving first dose.

  12. Change From Baseline in FHSI-8 Total Score by Time-point

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 3, Week 6, Week 9, Week 12, Week 12, Week 18, Week 24 and every 3 weeks through end of study (participant death/withdrawal from study)

    The FHSI-8 includes eight items representing pancreatic-related symptoms; each symptom is rated by participants on a scale of from 0 to 4. The FHSI-8 total score ranges in value from 0 to 32, with higher scores representing fewer symptoms and lower scores representing more symptoms. Scoring of the FHSI-8 was to be conducted according to the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) manual. The symptom assessment was to include treated participants who had baseline measurement and at least one on-study measurement of FHSI-8 questionnaire.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

R-Pharm

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

A Phase II, Open Label Trial of Ixabepilone Plus Cetuximab as First Line Therapy for Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer

Important dates

Study start
2007
Primary completion
2009
Study completion
2009
First posted
Oct 2, 2006
Registry last updated
Mar 10, 2016

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.