LDE225
DrugSonidegib for oral suspension was supplied in amber glass bottles. Sonidegib oral suspension was combined with the supplied reconstitution vehicle to a final concentration of 50 mg/mL.
NCT Number: NCT01708174
This Phase II study evaluated the safety and efficacy of LDE225 in adult and pediatric patients with Hh-pathway activated, relapsed MB.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me4 month and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 2
Novartis Investigative Site, Herston, Queensland, Australia
This study was a single-arm study of the efficacy and safety of oral sonidegib in patients with Hh-pathway activated relapsed medulloblastoma. It was initially designed as a randomized, controlled, open-label phase III study of adults and children with Hh-pathway activated MB whose disease had failed standard of care therapy, including radiation therapy (RT). The original study consisted of a randomized controlled part and a non-randomized uncontrolled part. Approximately 69 patients were to be randomized in a 2:1 ratio to receive sonidegib oral suspension or the active control, temozolomide (TMZ) capsules. Randomization was to be stratified according to age, <18 years versus ≥ 18 years. Approximately 40 patients were to receive sonidegib in the non-randomized uncontrolled part of the study. Following the enrollment of 11 patients, the study was amended to become a phase II single-arm study with only sonidegib, and the target enrollment was changed to 20 patients. Prior to the study amendment, TMZ participants whose disease progressed while on TMZ were permitted to crossover to sonidegib. After the amendment, participants receiving TMZ were crossed over to sonidegib.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Sonidegib for oral suspension was supplied in amber glass bottles. Sonidegib oral suspension was combined with the supplied reconstitution vehicle to a final concentration of 50 mg/mL.
Temozolomide capsules were obtained locally by the Investigator
Time frame: from date first participant randomized, 13-Sep-2013 to date of data cut-off, 15-Nov-2016
ORR was defined as the percentage of participants with best overall response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) (as per tumor response guidelines and criteria for Medulloblastoma). The IRC evaluated all radiological images and applicable clinical data (i.e., neurological examination, steroid use and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) results as applicable). Assessments after crossover were not included for TMZ participants.
Time frame: from date first participant randomized, 13-Sep-2013 to date of data cut-off, 15-Nov-2016
PFS was defined as the time from date of randomization to the date of event defined as the first documented progression or death due to any cause (as per tumor response guidelines and criteria for Medulloblastoma). The IRC evaluated all radiological images and applicable clinical data (i.e., neurological examination, steroid use and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) results as applicable). TMZ participants without event prior to crossover were censored.
Time frame: from date first participant randomized, 13-Sep-2013 to date of data cut-off, 15-Nov-2016
PFS was defined as the time from date of randomization to the date of event defined as the first documented progression or death due to any cause. PFS was evaluated by local Investigator assessment per tumor response guidelines and criteria for Medulloblastoma.
Time frame: from date first participant randomized, 13-Sep-2013 to date of data cut-off, 15-Nov-2016
ORR was defined as the percentage of participants with best overall response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR). ORR was evaluated by local Investigator assessment per tumor response guidelines and criteria for Medulloblastoma. Assessments after crossover were not included for TMZ patients.
Time frame: from date first participant randomized, 13-Sep-2013 to date of data cut-off, 15-Nov-2016
DoR was defined as the time from the first documented onset of confirmed PR or CR to the date of PD/relapse or death due to medulloblastoma. DoR was evaluated by local Investigator assessment per tumor response guidelines and criteria for Medulloblastoma. TMZ participants without an event prior to crossover were censored.
Time frame: from date first participant randomized, 13-Sep-2013 to date of data cut-off, 15-Nov-2016
OS was defined as the time from date of randomization to date of death due to any cause. All deaths are considered, including deaths occurred after crossover for TMZ participants.
Time frame: Weeks 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 13, 17, 21, 25, 29, 33, 37, 41, 45, 49 and 53
Blood samples were collected for assessment. The children's group was analyzed up until week 25 only.
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Industry
A Phase II, Multi-center, Open-label, Single-arm Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Oral LDE225 in Patients With Hh-pathway Activated Relapsed Medulloblastoma
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT00867568
Disease Attributes, Glioma
San Diego, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03434262
Anaplastic Astrocytoma, Anaplastic Ependymoma
Memphis, Tennessee, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT01331135
Adenocarcinoma, Astrocytoma
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT01125800
Astrocytoma, Disease Attributes
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
View Trial Details