Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01473420

A Phase 3 Study Comparing the Effects of Subcutaneous Epoetin Hospira and Epoetin Alfa [Epogen] (Amgen) in Patients With Chronic Renal Failure Requiring Hemodialysis and Receiving Epoetin Maintenance Treatment. AiME - Anemia Management With Epoetin

The purpose of this study is to demonstrate therapeutic equivalence of subcutaneous (SC) Epoetin Hospira compared to SC Epogen (Amgen), based on maintenance of hemoglobin (Hb) levels and study drug dose requirements in patients treated for anemia associated with chronic renal failure and on hemodialysis.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–80 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 3

Primary location

North America Research Institute, Azusa, California, United States

Loading trial locations.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patient is able to provide written informed consent after risks and benefits of the study have been explained prior to any study related activities
  • Hemodialysis patients with chronic renal failure and renal anemia currently on stable Epogen (Amgen) dose administered IV or SC, 1 to 3 times per week for whom the following apply:
  • A change in Epogen dosing of no more than 10% from the mean
  • Mean hemoglobin between 9.0 and 11.0 g/dL
  • No more than one hemoglobin result outside of range from 9.0-11.0 g/dL
  • No hemoglobin result more than ±1 g/dL from the mean hemoglobin level
  • Patients on stable, adequate dialysis for at least 12 weeks prior to randomization, defined as no clinically relevant changes of dialysis regimen and/or dialyzer
  • Patients with adequate iron stores, defined as plasma ferritin > 100 μg/L and TSAT >20%, prior to randomization
  • Male or female patients aged 18 to 80 years (both inclusive)
  • If female, patient must be postmenopausal for at least one year prior to randomization, surgically sterile (bilateral tubal ligation, bilateral oophorectomy or hysterectomy), or practicing at least one of the following methods of birth control:
  • hormonal contraceptives (oral, parenteral or transdermal) for at least 3 months prior to randomization
  • intrauterine device (IUD)
  • double-barrier method (condoms, contraceptive sponge, diaphragm or vaginal ring with spermicidal jellies or cream)

If hormonal contraceptives are used, the specific contraceptive must have been used for at least 3 months prior to randomization. If the patient is currently using a hormonal contraceptive, she should also use a barrier method during this study and for at least 30 days following the administration of the patient's last dose

Exclusion criteria

  • Maintenance epoetin dosage >600 U/kg per week (1-3 times per week)
  • Treatment with long-acting epoetin analogues such as Aranesp ® within 12 weeks prior to randomization
  • Any of the following within 3 months prior to randomization:
  • Myocardial infarction
  • Stroke (cerebrovascular accident)/cerebrovascular insult (minor stroke) or transient ischemic attack/intracerebral bleeding/cerebral infarction
  • Severe/unstable angina
  • Coronary angioplasty, bypass surgery, or peripheral artery bypass graft
  • Decompensated congestive heart failure (New York Heart Association [NYHA] class IV)
  • Pulmonary embolism
  • Deep vein thrombosis or other thromboembolic event
  • Received live or attenuated vaccination (except flu vaccination)
  • Uncontrolled hypertension within the 4 weeks prior to randomization defined as more than 10% of post-dialysis blood pressures >170 mmHg systolic and/or >110 mmHg diastolic, based on blood pressure readings obtained when the patient's post-dialysis body weight was not more than 0.5 kg above their listed dry weight
  • Known, clinically manifested deficiency of folic acid and/or vitamin B12 (irrespective of whether currently treated or not)
  • A patient with any active, uncontrolled systemic, inflammatory or malignant disease that in the Investigator's opinion may be significant to exclude participation in the study, including but not limited to demyelinating diseases such as multiple sclerosis, microbial, viral or fungal infection or mental disease
  • Contraindication for the test drug or have been previously treated with Epoetin Hospira
  • Relative or absolute iron deficiency prior to randomization into the Maintenance Period
  • Platelet count below 100 x 10^9/L
  • Clinically relevant increase of CRP (>10 mg/dL) for at least 2 weeks
  • Significant drug sensitivity or a significant allergic reaction to any drug, as well as known hypersensitivity or idiosyncratic reaction to epoetin (or its excipients, including albumin) or any other related drugs that in the judgment of the Investigator is exclusionary for the study participation
  • History of any of the following:
  • Detectable anti-rhEPO antibodies
  • Clinically relevant malnutrition
  • Confirmed aluminum intoxication
  • Myelodysplastic syndrome
  • Known bone marrow fibrosis (osteitis fibrosa cystica)
  • Known seizure disorder
  • Liver cirrhosis with clinical evidence of complications (portal hypertension, splenomegaly, ascites)
  • A female patient who is pregnant, lactating or planning a pregnancy during the study
  • History of drug abuse or alcohol abuse within 2 years prior to randomization as determined by the Investigator
  • Current participation or participation in a drug or other investigational research study within 30 days prior to randomization
  • May not be able to comply with the requirements of this clinical study, communicate effectively with study personnel, or is considered by the Investigator, for any reason, to be an unsuitable candidate for the study
  • Donated or lost >475 mL (i.e., 1 pint) blood volume (including plasmapheresis) or had a transfusion of any blood product within 3 months prior to randomization
  • A patient who in the Investigator's opinion, has any clinically significant abnormal laboratory evaluations, including liver function taken at Screening Visit
  • Positive laboratory test for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) or hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)

Treatment and study plan

Epoetin Hospira

Biological

Variable dose

Epogen Amgen

Biological

Variable dose

Other names: Epoetin Alfa

Primary outcomes

  1. Mean Weekly Hemoglobin Level From Week 30 to Week 34: Maintenance Period

    Time frame: Week 30 up to Week 34

  2. Mean Weekly Dosage of Study Medication From Week 30 to Week 34: Maintenance Period

    Time frame: Week 30 up to Week 34

Secondary outcomes

  1. Mean Weekly Hemoglobin Level From Week 19 to Week 34: Maintenance Period

    Time frame: Week 19 up to Week 34

  2. Mean Weekly Dosage of Study Medication From Week 19 to Week 34: Maintenance Period

    Time frame: Week 19 up to Week 34

  3. Total Dose of Study Medication Administered: Maintenance Period

    Time frame: Week 19 up to Week 34

    In this outcome measure mean of total dose of study medication administered in maintenance period was reported.

  4. Percentage of Participants With Mean Weekly Hemoglobin Level Within the Target Range: Maintenance Period

    Time frame: Week 26, 34

    Percentage of participants who had hemoglobin level within the target range of 9 to 11 g/dL for the specified weeks were reported.

  5. Percentage of Participants Who Required Permanent Dose Changes: Maintenance Period

    Time frame: Week 19 up to Week 34

  6. Percentage of Participants Who Required Temporary Dose Changes: Maintenance Period

    Time frame: Week 19 up to Week 34

  7. Percentage of Participants With Any Transient Change of Hemoglobin Level Greater Than (>) 1.0 Gram Per Deciliter (g/dL): Maintenance Period

    Time frame: Week 19 up to Week 34

  8. Percentage of Participants With Mean Weekly Hemoglobin Level Outside the Target Range: Maintenance Period

    Time frame: Week 26, 34

    Percentage of participants who had hemoglobin level outside the target range of 9 to 11 g/dL for the specified weeks were reported.

  9. Percentage of Participants Who Qualified as Optimally Titrated and Stable: Titration Period

    Time frame: Week 1 up to Week 18

  10. Percentage of Participants Who Received Blood Transfusions: Maintenance Period

    Time frame: Week 19 up to Week 34

  11. Number of Participants With Change in Mean Dose of Study Medication Based on Hemoglobin Level: Maintenance Period

    Time frame: Week 19 up to Week 34

    In this outcome measure number of participants with change (increase and decrease) in mean dose of Epoetin Hospira and Epogen were categorized and reported according to their mean hemoglobin levels. Hemoglobin levels were divided in following classes: >11.0 g/dL, from 9.0 to 11.0 g/dL and <9.0 g/dL

  12. Percentage of Participants With Any Transient Change of Hemoglobin Level Greater Than (>) 2.0 Gram Per Deciliter (g/dL) in Hemoglobin Level: Maintenance Period

    Time frame: Week 19 up to Week 34

Other outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants With Hemoglobin Level Less Than (<) 8.0 Gram Per Deciliter (g/dL): Maintenance Period

    Time frame: Week 19 up to Week 34

  2. Percentage of Participants With Hemoglobin Level Greater Than (>) 12.0 Gram Per Deciliter (g/dL): Maintenance Period

    Time frame: Week 19 up to Week 34

  3. Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

    Time frame: Titration Period: Week 1 up to Week 18 and Maintenance Period: Week 19 up to Week 38

    An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. A treatment emergent AE was defined as an event that emerged during the treatment period that was absent before treatment, or worsened during the treatment period relative to the pretreatment state. AEs included both serious and non-serious adverse events.

  4. Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Severity

    Time frame: Titration Period: Week 1 up to Week 18 and Maintenance Period: Week 19 up to Week 38

    An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. A treatment emergent AE was defined as an event that emerged during the treatment period that was absent before treatment, or worsened during the treatment period relative to the pretreatment state. An AE was assessed according to severity; mild (AE was transient and easily tolerated by the participant), moderate (caused problem that did not interfere significantly with usual activities) and severe (caused problem that interferes significantly with usual activities and might be incapacitating or life-threatening).

  5. Number of Participants With Treatment Related Adverse Events (AEs)

    Time frame: Titration Period: Week 1 up to Week 18 and Maintenance Period: Week 19 up to Week 38

    An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug.

  6. Number of Participants That Discontinued Treatment Due to a Treatment Emergent Adverse Event

    Time frame: Titration Period: Week 1 up to Week 18 and Maintenance Period: Week 19 up to Week 38

    In this outcome measure number of participants discontinued from study drug (Epoetin Hospira, Epogen) due to any AE were reported.

  7. Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Change From Baseline in Laboratory Parameters

    Time frame: Titration Period: Baseline (Pre-dose on Week 1) up to Week 18 and Maintenance Period: Baseline (Pre-dose on Week 19) up to Week 38

    Laboratory parameters: Hematology (hematocrit, hemoglobin, red blood cell count, reticulocytes, white blood cell count, neutrophils, bands, lymphocytes, monocytes, basophils, eosinophils, platelet count, mean corpuscular volume); coagulation panel (prothrombin time, international normalized ratio, activated partial thromboplastin time); clinical chemistry (blood urea nitrogen, creatinine, alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, total bilirubin, gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase, alkaline phosphatase, sodium, potassium, calcium, magnesium, phosphorus, uric acid, total protein, glucose, albumin, C-reactive protein, plasma ferritin, transferrin saturation). Participants with clinically significant change from baseline in laboratory parameters were as determined by the investigator.

  8. Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Change From Baseline in Vital Signs

    Time frame: Titration Period: Baseline (Pre-dose on Week 1) up to Week 18 and Maintenance Period: Baseline (Pre-dose on Week 19) up to Week 38

    Vital sign parameters: temperature (oral, tympanic, or other), blood pressure (diastolic and systolic), heart rate (in a seated position) and dry weight (post-dialysis). Participants with clinically significant change from baseline in vital signs were as determined by the investigator.

  9. Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Change From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG)

    Time frame: Titration Period: Baseline (Pre-dose on Week 1) up to Week 18 and Maintenance Period: Baseline (Pre-dose on Week 19) up to Week 38

    ECG parameters: PR interval, QRS complex, QT interval and QTC interval. Participants with clinically significant change from baseline in ECG were as determined by the investigator.

  10. Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Change From Baseline in Physical Examination

    Time frame: Titration Period: Baseline (Pre-dose on Week 1) up to Week 18 and Maintenance Period: Baseline (Pre-dose on Week 19) up to Week 38

    Physical examination included examination of the following: skin, eyes, ears, throat, cardiac, respiratory, gastrointestinal, genitourinary and musculoskeletal systems. Participants with clinically significant change from baseline in physical examination were as determined by the investigator.

  11. Percentage of Participants With Anti-Recombinant Human Erythropoietin (Anti-rhEPO) Antibodies

    Time frame: Titration Period: Week 1 up to Week 18 and Maintenance Period: Week 19 up to Week 38

    Percentage of participants with presence of anti-rhEPO antibodies were reported in this outcome measure. Radioimmunoprecipitation assay method was used to determine the presence of anti-rhEPO antibodies.

  12. Percentage of Participants With General Tolerability

    Time frame: Titration Period: Week 1 up to Week 18 and Maintenance Period: Week 19 up to Week 38

    General tolerability was classified as: 1) excellent tolerability = no reaction, 2) good tolerability = minimal reaction, 3) mild intolerability = reaction above that normally observed with any kind of subcutaneous product, 4) moderate intolerability = marked reaction, but no need for discontinuation of treatment and 5) severe intolerability = treatment discontinued due to intolerability.

  13. Percentage of Participants With Local Tolerability

    Time frame: Titration Period: Week 1 up to Week 18 and Maintenance Period: Week 19 up to Week 38

    Local tolerability was classified as: 1) excellent tolerability = no reaction at site of injection, 2) good tolerability = minimal reaction at site of injection normally observed with any kind of subcutaneous product, 3) mild intolerability = reaction at site of injection above that normally observed with any kind of subcutaneous product, 4) moderate intolerability = marked reaction, but no need for discontinuation of treatment and 5) severe intolerability = treatment discontinued due to intolerability.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Pfizer

Industry

Collaborators

  • Hospira, now a wholly owned subsidiary of Pfizer

Registry information

Official study title

A Therapeutic-equivalence Study Comparing The Efficacy And Safety Of Subcutaneous Epoetin Hospira And Epoetin Alfa (Amgen) In Patients With Chronic Renal Failure Requiring Hemodialysis And Receiving Epoetin Maintenance Treatment

Acronym: AiME - 13

Important dates

Study start
2012
Primary completion
2014
Study completion
2014
First posted
Nov 17, 2011
Registry last updated
Aug 9, 2018

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.