Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01347710

A Phase 3 Multi-center Study to Assess PET Imaging of Flurpiridaz F 18 Injection in Patients With CAD.

The primary objective of the study is to assess the diagnostic efficacy (specificity and sensitivity) of flurpiridaz F18 injection PET myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) compared to single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) MPI in the detection of significant coronary artery disease (CAD) as defined by invasive coronary angiography (ICA) or a documented history of Myocardial Infarction (MI).

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 3

Primary location

University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada

Loading trial locations.

About this study

The study will assess the diagnostic efficacy (sensitivity and specificity) of Flurpiridaz F18 Injection MPI against SPECT MPI in patients screened for CAD as determined by ICA. Six hundred and eighty evaluable patients will be enrolled and will undergo SPECT MPI and Flurpiridaz F18 PET MPI. Patients will be considered for enrollment if they are scheduled to undergo or have undergone prior ICA without intervention (being either positive or negative for CAD).

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

Invasive Coronary Angiography. Men or Women age 18 or older - see protocol for additional details.

Exclusion criteria

Women who are pregnant, lactating, or of child bearing potential who are not practicing birth control.

Unstable cardiac status. History of coronary artery bypass graft. History of percutaneous coronary intervention within the past six months. See protocol for additional details.

Treatment and study plan

Flurpiridaz F18

Drug

Injection of Flurpiridaz F18 for the purposes of PET myocardial profusion imaging (MPI) analysis

Other names: flurpiridaz F 18

99mTechnicium (sestamibi or tetrofosmin)

Drug

Injection of 99mTc sestamibi or tetrofosmin for the purposes of SPECT MPI analysis

Other names: 99mTc sestamibi or 99mTc Tetrofosmin

Primary outcomes

  1. Diagnostic Efficacy of Flurpiridaz F 18 PET Myocardial Perfusion Imaging (MPI) Sensitivity Versus SPECT Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Sensitivity

    Time frame: 60 days

    Diagnostic efficacy of one day rest and stress flurpiridaz F 18 PET MPI sensitivity versus SPECT MPI sensitivity in the detection of coronary artery disease (CAD) by majority rule using invasive coronary angiography as the truth standard,

  2. Diagnostic Efficacy of Flurpiridaz PET MPI Specificity Versus SPECT MPI Specificity

    Time frame: 60 days

    Diagnostic efficacy of flurpiridaz PET MPI specificity versus SPECT MPI specificity by majority rule in the detection of CAD using invasive coronary angiography as the truth standard

Secondary outcomes

  1. Diagnostic Efficacy of Flurpiridaz F18 PET MPI Sensitivity Versus SPECT MPI Sensitivity in Subgroups: Pharmacologic Stress, Females and BMI>/=30.

    Time frame: 60 days

    Diagnostic efficacy of flurpiridaz F18 PET MPI sensitivity versus SPECT MPI sensitivity by majority rule in the detection of CAD using invasive coronary angiography as the truth standard, , in subgroups: pharmacologic stress, females and BMI >/=30. Value reported is the number of true positives, i.e. True Positive: Patients with abnormal MPI and disease positive by the truth standard

    I

  2. Diagnostic Efficacy of Flurpiridaz F18 PET MPI Specificity Versus SPECT Specificity in Subgroups: Pharmacologic Stress, Females and BMI>/=30.

    Time frame: 60 days

    Diagnostic efficacy of flurpiridaz F18 PET MPI specificity versus SPECT specificity by majority rule in the detection of CAD using invasive coronary angiography as the truth standard, in subgroups: pharmacologic stress, females and BMI >/=30. Value represents the number of true negative, i.e. True Negative: Patients with normal MPI and disease negative by the truth standard

  3. Diagnostic Performance Evaluation of Localization of CAD for Sensitivity (PETVsSPECT).

    Time frame: 60 days

    Overall sensitivity of flurpiridaz F18 PET MPI in coronary territories (Qualitative Diagnosis vs. SPECT MPI by majority rule vs. truth standard (angiographic stenosis greater than or equal to 50% stenosis and confirmed MI); left descending coronary artery (LAD), left circumflex artery (LCX), right coronary artery (RCA), and non - LAD. Value reported is the number of true positives, i.e. True Positive: Patients with abnormal MPI and disease positive by the truth standard

  4. Diagnostic Performance Evaluation of Localization of CAD for Specificity (PETVsSPECT).

    Time frame: 60 days

    Overall specificity of flurpiridaz F18 PET MPI in Coronary Territories (Qualitative Diagnosis) vs. SPECT MPI by majority rule vs. truth standard (angiographic stenosis greater than or equal to 50% stenosis and confirmed MI); left descending coronary artery (LAD), left circumflex artery (LCX), right coronary artery (RCA), and non - LAD. Value represents the number of true negative, i.e. True Negative: Patients with normal MPI and disease negative by the truth standard

  5. Diagnositic Performance Evaluation of Multivessel Disease (PETvsSPECT).

    Time frame: 60 days

    Overall summary of sensitivity for identifying multi-vessel disease between flurpiridaz F18 PET MPI and SPECT MPI by majority rule vs. truth standard (angio >/=50% stenosis and confirmed MI). Value reported is the number of true positives, i.e. True Positive: Patients with abnormal MPI and disease positive by the truth standard

  6. Diagnositic Performance Evaluation of Multivessel Disease (PETvsSPECT).

    Time frame: 60 days

    Overall summary of specificity for identifying multi-vessel disease between flurpiridaz F18 PET MPI and SPECT MPI by majority rule vs. majority rule (angio >/=50% stenosis and confirmed MI). Value represents the number of true negative, i.e. True Negative: Patients with normal MPI and disease negative by the truth standard

  7. Overall Summary of Sensitivity of PET MPI vs SPECT MPI; Image Quality Excellent or Good

    Time frame: 60 days

    Overall summary of sensitivity of flurpiridaz F18 PET MPI (qualitative image quality of excellent or good) vs. SPECT MPI by majority rule vs. truth standard(angio >/=50% stenosis and confirmed MI). Value reported is the number of true positives, i.e. True Positive: Patients with abnormal MPI and disease positive by the truth standard

  8. Overall Summary of Specificity of PET MPI vs SPECT MPI; Image Quality of Excellent or Good

    Time frame: 60 days

    Overall summary of specificity of flurpiridaz F18 PET MPI (qualitative, image quality excellent or good) vs. SPECT MPI by majority rule vs truth standard (angio >/=50% stenosis and confirmed MI). Value represents the number of true negative, i.e. True Negative: Patients with normal MPI and disease negative by the truth standard

  9. Image Quality of Rest and Stress (PET vs SPECT).

    Time frame: 60 days

    Overall summary of rest and stress image quality for flurpiridaz F18 PET MPI and SPECT MPI by majority rule. Value represents the number of subject images evaluated as excellent/good and fair/poor

  10. Diagnostic Certainty in PET MPI and SPECT MPI

    Time frame: 60 days

    Overall summary of diagnostic certainty in flurpiridaz F18 PET MPI and SPECT MPI by majority rule

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Lantheus Medical Imaging

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

A Phase 3, Open Label, Multicenter Study for the Assessment of Myocardial Perfusion Using Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Imaging of Flurpiridaz F18 Injection in Patients With Suspected or Known Coronary Artery Disease (CAD)

Important dates

Study start
2011
Primary completion
2013
Study completion
2013
First posted
May 4, 2011
Registry last updated
Nov 24, 2020

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.