Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT04996797

A Phase 2 Safety and Efficacy Study of Tulisokibart (MK-7240/PRA023) in Subjects With Moderately to Severely Active Ulcerative Colitis (MK-7240-005)

The purpose of this study is to assess the safety and efficacy of tulisokibart in participants with moderately to severely active Ulcerative Colitis (UC). After the completion of the 12-week induction, all participants have the option to continue in the open-label extension for up to 170 weeks.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 2

Primary location

Prometheus Biosciences Selected Site, Woodville, Adelaide, Australia

Loading trial locations.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

The main inclusion criteria include but are not limited to the following:

  • Confirmed diagnosis of ulcerative colitis (UC)
  • Has moderately to severely active UC as defined by 3-component Modified Mayo score
  • Must have corticosteroid dependence or have had no response, insufficient response, loss of response, and/or intolerance to at least one of the following therapies: corticosteroid, immunosuppressants, or an approved anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF), anti-integrin, anti-interleukin 12/23 (anti-IL12/23), Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor, Sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor (S1PR) modulator.

Exclusion criteria

The main exclusion criteria include but are not limited to the following:

  • Has diagnosis of Crohn's disease or indeterminate colitis
  • Has current evidence of fulminant colitis, toxic megacolon, bowel perforation, total proctocoloectomy or partial colectomy
  • Has current or impending need for colostomy or ileostomy
  • Has had surgical bowel resection within 3 months before screening
  • Has past or current evidence of definite low-grade or high-grade colonic dysplasia not completely removed

Treatment and study plan

Tulisokibart

Drug

Administered by IV infusion

Other names: MK-7240, PRA023

Companion Diagnostic (CDx) Testing

Device

PRA023 CDx Genotyping Assay

Placebo

Other

Placebo administered by IV infusion

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants in Cohort 1 Achieving Clinical Remission

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

    The 3-component Modified Mayo Score (MMS) ranges from 0 to 9 and is composed of endoscopic assessment, rectal bleeding (RB), and stool frequency (SF) subscores with each of the components ranging from 0 to 3, with higher scores indicating more severe disease. Clinical remission is defined as endoscopic subscore of 0 or 1, RB subscore of 0, and SF subscore of 0 or 1 and not greater than baseline. Per protocol participants in Cohort 1 were analyzed for this outcome measure.

  2. Percentage of Participants Who Experienced an Adverse Event (AE)

    Time frame: Up to ~14 weeks

    An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which did not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE could therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product or protocol-specified procedure, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product or protocol-specified procedure. Any worsening of a pre-existing condition that was temporally associated with the use of the Sponsor's product was also an AE. Reported adverse experiences used the Common Terminology for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.0. Per protocol, adverse events are reported by treatment with tulisokibart or placebo regardless of assigned cohort. Participants received identical treatment regiments regardless of cohort. The percentage of participants who experienced at least one AE is reported.

  3. Percentage of Participants Who Discontinued Due to an AE

    Time frame: Up to ~14 weeks

    An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which did not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE could therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product or protocol-specified procedure, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product or protocol-specified procedure. Any worsening of a pre-existing condition that was temporally associated with the use of the Sponsor's product was also an AE. Reported adverse experiences used the Common Terminology for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.0. Per protocol, adverse events are reported by treatment with tulisokibart or placebo regardless of assigned cohort. Participants received identical treatment regiments regardless of cohort. The percentage of participants who discontinued due to an AE is reported.

  4. Percentage of Participants Who Had One or More Serious Adverse Events

    Time frame: Up to ~14 weeks

    Reported adverse experiences used the Common Terminology for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.0. Serious adverse events are defined as: severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling; limiting self-care activities of daily living (ADL), Life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated, and death. Per protocol, adverse events are reported by treatment with tulisokibart or placebo regardless of assigned cohort. Participants received identical treatment regiments regardless of cohort. The percentage of participants experiencing a serious AE are presented.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants in Cohort 1 With Endoscopic Improvement

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

    The 3-component MMS ranges from 0 to 9 and is composed of endoscopic assessment, RB, and SF subscores with each of the components ranging from 0 to 3, with higher scores indicating more severe disease. Endoscopic improvement is defined by endoscopy subscore of the MMS of ≤ 1 with no friability. Per protocol participants in Cohort 1 were analyzed for this outcome measure.

  2. Percentage of Participants in Cohort 1 Achieving Clinical Response

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

    The 3-component MMS ranges from 0 to 9 and is composed of endoscopic assessment, RB, and SF subscores with each of the components ranging from 0 to 3, with higher scores indicating more severe disease. Clinical response is defined as a reduction from Baseline ≥ 2 points and ≥ 30% in 3-component Modified Mayo Score, accompanied by a reduction ≥ 1 in RB subscore or absolute RB subscore ≤ 1. Per protocol participants in Cohort 1 were analyzed for this outcome measure.

  3. Percentage of Participants Who Were CDx+ (Cohorts 1 + 2) With Clinical Remission

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

    The 3-component MMS ranges from 0 to 9 and is composed of endoscopic assessment, RB, and SF subscores with each of the components ranging from 0 to 3, with higher scores indicating more severe disease. Clinical remission is defined as endoscopic subscore of 0 or 1, RB subscore of 0, and SF subscore of 0 or 1 and not greater than baseline. Per protocol participants who were CDx+ (Cohort 1 + Cohort 2) were analyzed for this outcome measure.

  4. Percentage of Participants in Cohort 1 With Symptomatic Remission

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

    RB, and SF subscores each range from 0 to 3, with higher scores indicating more severe disease. Symptomatic remission is defined as participants with SF subscore = 0 and RB subscore = 0. The percentage of participants who achieved symptomatic remission is presented. Per protocol participants in Cohort 1 were analyzed for this outcome measure.

  5. Percentage of Participants in Cohort 1 With Histologic Improvement

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

    Histologic improvement is defined as Geboes score ≤ 3.1. The Geboes histologic index includes 7 histological features (architectural change, chronic inflammatory infiltrate, lamina propria neutrophils and eosinophils, neutrophils in epithelium, crypt destruction and erosion or ulcers). The Geboes score has 6 grades from 0 to 5, with each grade of the score divided into 4 or 5 subcategories; the score ranges from 0.0 to 5.4. A higher score indicates more severe disease. Per protocol participants in Cohort 1 were analyzed for this outcome measure.

  6. Percentage of Participants in Cohort 1 With Histologic-endoscopic Mucosal Improvement

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

    Histologic-endoscopic mucosal improvement is defined as a Geboes score ≤ 3.1 and endoscopy subscore of the MMS ≤ 1 with no friability. The Geboes histologic index includes 7 histological features (architectural change, chronic inflammatory infiltrate, lamina propria neutrophils and eosinophils, neutrophils in epithelium, crypt destruction and erosion or ulcers). The Geboes score has 6 grades from 0 to 5, with each grade of the score divided into 4 or 5 subcategories; the score ranges from 0.0 to 5.4. The endoscopic subscore of the MMS ranges from 0-3. For both scales a higher score indicates more severe disease. Per protocol participants in Cohort 1 were analyzed for this outcome measure.

  7. Percentage of Participants Who Were CDx+ (Cohorts 1 + 2) With Endoscopic Improvement

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

    The 3-component MMS ranges from 0 to 9 and is composed of endoscopic assessment, RB, and SF subscores with each of the components ranging from 0 to 3, with higher scores indicating more severe disease. Endoscopic improvement is defined by endoscopy subscore of MMS of ≤ 1 with no friability. Per protocol participants who were CDx+ (Cohort 1 + Cohort 2) were analyzed for this outcome measure.

  8. Percentage of Participants Who Were CDx+ (Cohorts 1 + 2) With Clinical Response

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

    The 3-component MMS ranges from 0 to 9 and is composed of endoscopic assessment, RB, and SF subscores with each of the components ranging from 0 to 3, with higher scores indicating more severe disease. Clinical response is defined by reduction from Baseline ≥ 2 points and ≥ 30% in 3-component Modified Mayo Score, accompanied by a reduction ≥ 1 in RB subscore or absolute RB subscore ≤ 1. Per protocol participants who were CDx+ (Cohort 1 + Cohort 2) were analyzed for this outcome measure.

  9. Percentage of Participants Who Were CDx+ (Cohorts 1 + 2) With Symptomatic Remission

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

    RB, and SF subscores each range from 0 to 3, with higher scores indicating more severe disease. Symptomatic remission is defined as participants with SF subscore = 0 and RB subscore = 0. The percentage of participants who achieved symptomatic remission is presented. Per protocol participants who were CDx+ (Cohort 1 + Cohort 2) were analyzed for this outcome measure.

  10. Percentage of Participants Who Were CDx+ (Cohorts 1 + 2) With Histologic Improvement

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

    Histologic improvement is defined as Geboes score ≤ 3.1. The Geboes histologic index includes 7 histological features (architectural change, chronic inflammatory infiltrate, lamina propria neutrophils and eosinophils, neutrophils in epithelium, crypt destruction and erosion or ulcers). The Geboes score has 6 grades from 0 to 5, with each grade of the score divided into 4 or 5 subcategories; the score ranges from 0.0 to 5.4. A higher score indicates more severe disease. Per protocol participants who were CDx+ (Cohorts 1 + 2) were analyzed for this outcome measure.

  11. Percentage of Participants Who Were CDx+ (Cohorts 1 + 2) With Histologic-endoscopic Mucosal Improvement

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

    Histologic-endoscopic mucosal improvement is defined as a Geboes score ≤ 3.1 and endoscopy subscore of the MMS ≤ 1 with no friability. The Geboes histologic index includes 7 histological features (architectural change, chronic inflammatory infiltrate, lamina propria neutrophils and eosinophils, neutrophils in epithelium, crypt destruction and erosion or ulcers). The Geboes score has 6 grades from 0 to 5, with each grade of the score divided into 4 or 5 subcategories; the score ranges from 0.0 to 5.4. The endoscopic subscore of the MMS ranges from 0-3. For both scales a higher score indicates more severe disease. Per protocol participants who were CDx+ (Cohorts 1 + 2) were analyzed for this outcome measure.

  12. Percentage of Participants in Cohort 1 With Histologic-endoscopic Mucosal Healing

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

    Histologic-endoscopic mucosal improvement is defined as Geboes score ≤ 2B.1 and endoscopy subscore of MMS ≤ 1 with no friability. The Geboes histologic index includes 7 histological features (architectural change, chronic inflammatory infiltrate, lamina propria neutrophils and eosinophils, neutrophils in epithelium, crypt destruction and erosion or ulcers). The Geboes score has 6 grades from 0 to 5, with each grade of the score divided into 4 or 5 subcategories; the score ranges from 0.0 to 5.4. The endoscopic subscore of the MMS ranges from 0-3. For both scales a higher score indicates more severe disease. Per protocol participants in Cohort 1 were analyzed for this outcome measure.

  13. Percentage of Participants Who Were CDx+ (Cohorts 1 + 2) With Histologic-endoscopic Mucosal Healing

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

    Histologic-endoscopic mucosal improvement is defined as Geboes score ≤ 2B.1 and endoscopy subscore of MMS ≤ 1 with no friability. The Geboes histologic index includes 7 histological features (architectural change, chronic inflammatory infiltrate, lamina propria neutrophils and eosinophils, neutrophils in epithelium, crypt destruction and erosion or ulcers). The Geboes score has 6 grades from 0 to 5, with each grade of the score divided into 4 or 5 subcategories; the score ranges from 0.0 to 5.4. The endoscopic subscore of the MMS ranges from 0-3. For both scales a higher score indicates more severe disease. Per protocol participants who were CDx+ (Cohorts 1 + 2) were analyzed for this outcome measure.

  14. Percentage of Participants in Cohort 1 With an Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Response

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

    IBDQ is a self-administered, disease-specific Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) instrument for subjects with IBD. The IBDQ covers 4 dimensions and 32 questions: bowel symptoms, systemic symptoms, emotional function, and social function. Items are scored on a 7-point Likert scale (1 = all of the time and 7 = none of the time), for a total global score in the range 32 to 224 (with higher scores indicating better HRQOL). IBDQ response, as defined by ≥ 16-point increase from Baseline at Week 12. Per protocol participants in Cohort 1 were analyzed for this outcome measure.

  15. Percentage of Participants Who Are CDx+ (Cohorts 1 + 2) Who Had an IBDQ Response

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

    IBDQ is a self-administered, disease-specific Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) instrument for subjects with IBD. The IBDQ covers 4 dimensions and 32 questions: bowel symptoms, systemic symptoms, emotional function, and social function. Items are scored on a 7-point Likert scale (1 = all of the time and 7 = none of the time), for a total global score in the range 32 to 224 (with higher scores indicating better HRQOL). IBDQ response, as defined by ≥ 16-point increase from Baseline at Week 12. Per protocol participants who were CDx+ (Cohorts 1 + 2) were analyzed for this outcome measure.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Prometheus Biosciences, Inc., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc. (Rahway, New Jersey USA)

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

A Phase 2, Multi-Center, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Safety, Efficacy, and Pharmacokinetics of Induction Therapy With PRA023 in Subjects With Moderately to Severely Active Ulcerative Colitis

Acronym: ARTEMIS-UC

Important dates

Study start
2021
Primary completion
2023
Study completion
2025
First posted
Aug 9, 2021
Registry last updated
Aug 6, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.