Apraglutide
DrugSingle dose of apraglutide
NCT Number: NCT05706623
The primary objective is to assess the pharmacokinetics (PK) of apraglutide in subjects with hepatic impairment compared with matched control subjects with normal hepatic function following single subcutaneous (SC) dose administration.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–75 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 1
APEX, Münich, Germany
A two stage design, open label, multi-center, non-randomized trial to evaluate the the safety and tolerability of a single subcutaneous dose of apraglutide in subjects with varying degrees of hepatic function. The hepatic function will estimated with the Child-Pugh classification.
Part 1: 8 subjects with moderate hepatic impairment (Cohort 1) and 8 subjects with normal hepatic function (Cohort 2).
Part 2: 8 subjects with mild hepatic impairment (Cohort 3) and 8 subjects with normal hepatic function (from Cohort 2 where possible and additional subject). Part 2 will be conducted only if the geometric mean ratio (GMR) of area under the curve extrapolated to infinity (AUCinf) or area under the curve from zero to the last measurable point (AUClast) for the moderate hepatic impairment group compared to the control group is ≥2.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
All Participants:
Participants with impaired hepatic function:
Exclusion criteria
Single dose of apraglutide
Time frame: Pre-dose Day 1; 6, 12, 24, 28, 36, 40, 48, 60, 72, 96, 120, 144, 168, 240, and 312 hours post-dose
Apraglutide was quantified in human plasma samples using a fully validated liquid chromatography mass spectrometry-based method, with a lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) of 1 ng/mL and an upper limit of 200 ng/mL. Plasma pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters for apraglutide were estimated using non-compartmental methods from the concentration-time profiles. Actual sampling times, rather than scheduled sampling times, were used. AUCinf was calculated as: AUCinf = AUC from time zero to the last quantifiable concentration (AUClast) + (Clast/kel) where Clast was the observed concentration at the last time point with concentrations above the lower limit of quantification and kel was the terminal elimination rate constant.
Time frame: Pre-dose Day 1; 6, 12, 24, 28, 36, 40, 48, 60, 72, 96, 120, 144, and 168 hours post-dose
Apraglutide was quantified in human plasma samples using a fully validated liquid chromatography mass spectrometry-based method, with a LLOQ of 1 ng/mL and an upper limit of 200 ng/mL. Plasma PK parameters for apraglutide were estimated using non-compartmental methods from the concentration-time profiles. Actual sampling times, rather than scheduled sampling times, were used.
Time frame: Pre-dose Day 1; 6, 12, 24, 28, 36, 40, 48, 60, 72, 96, 120, 144, 168, 240, and 312 hours post-dose
Apraglutide was quantified in human plasma samples using a fully validated liquid chromatography mass spectrometry-based method, with a LLOQ of 1 ng/mL and an upper limit of 200 ng/mL. Plasma PK parameters for apraglutide were estimated using non-compartmental methods from the concentration-time profiles. Actual sampling times, rather than scheduled sampling times, were used. Cmax was the observed peak analyte concentration obtained directly from the experimental data without interpolation, expressed in concentration units.
Time frame: Pre-dose Day 1; 6, 12, 24, 28, 36, 40, 48, 60, 72, 96, 120, 144, 168, 240, and 312 hours post-dose
Apraglutide was quantified in human plasma samples using a fully validated liquid chromatography mass spectrometry-based method, with a LLOQ of 1 ng/mL and an upper limit of 200 ng/mL. Plasma PK parameters for apraglutide were estimated using non-compartmental methods from the concentration-time profiles. Actual sampling times, rather than scheduled sampling times, were used. Tmax was the first observed time to reach peak analyte concentration obtained directly from the experimental data without interpolation, expressed in time units.
Time frame: Pre-dose Day 1; 6, 12, 24, 28, 36, 40, 48, 60, 72, 96, 120, 144, 168, 240, and 312 hours post-dose
Apraglutide was quantified in human plasma samples using a fully validated liquid chromatography mass spectrometry-based method, with a LLOQ of 1 ng/mL and an upper limit of 200 ng/mL. Plasma PK parameters for apraglutide were estimated using non-compartmental methods from the concentration-time profiles. Actual sampling times, rather than scheduled sampling times, were used.
Time frame: Pre-dose Day 1; 6, 12, 24, 28, 36, 40, 48, 60, 72, 96, 120, 144, 168, 240, and 312 hours post-dose
Apraglutide was quantified in human plasma samples using a fully validated liquid chromatography mass spectrometry-based method, with a LLOQ of 1 ng/mL and an upper limit of 200 ng/mL. Plasma PK parameters for apraglutide were estimated using non-compartmental methods from the concentration-time profiles. Actual sampling times, rather than scheduled sampling times, were used. Terminal elimination rate constant calculated by linear regression of the terminal log-linear portion of the concentration vs. time curve. Linear regression of at least three points and an adjusted r^2 greater than or equal to 0.80 were required to obtain a reliable kel.
Time frame: Pre-dose Day 1; 6, 12, 24, 28, 36, 40, 48, 60, 72, 96, 120, 144, 168, 240, and 312 hours post-dose
Apraglutide was quantified in human plasma samples using a fully validated liquid chromatography mass spectrometry-based method, with a LLOQ of 1 ng/mL and an upper limit of 200 ng/mL. Plasma PK parameters for apraglutide were estimated using non-compartmental methods from the concentration-time profiles. Actual sampling times, rather than scheduled sampling times, were used.
Time frame: Pre-dose Day 1; 6, 12, 24, 28, 36, 40, 48, 60, 72, 96, 120, 144, 168, 240, and 312 hours post-dose
Apraglutide was quantified in human plasma samples using a fully validated liquid chromatography mass spectrometry-based method, with a LLOQ of 1 ng/mL and an upper limit of 200 ng/mL. Plasma PK parameters for apraglutide were estimated using non-compartmental methods from the concentration-time profiles. Actual sampling times, rather than scheduled sampling times, were used.
Time frame: Day 1 to Day 14
A TEAE was any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with apraglutide, whether or not related, that occurred or worsened after the dose of apraglutide. A serious TEAE was defined as any TEAE that resulted in death, was life-threatening, required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, was a congenital anomaly/birth defect or was an important medical event. TEAEs were graded for severity based on the National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) version 5.0 as follows from Grade 1 (mild) to Grade 5 (AE resulted in death). Clinically significant changes in physical examination findings, laboratory results, vital signs, and 12-lead electrocardiograms (ECGs) were also recorded as TEAEs.
VectivBio AG
Industry
A Phase 1, Open-Label Evaluation of the Pharmacokinetics and Safety of a Single Dose of Apraglutide in Subjects With Normal and Impaired Hepatic Function
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03289234
Healthy, Hepatic Impairment
Fukuoka, Japan
View Trial DetailsNCT04332432
Hepatic Impairment
Rialto, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06736223
Hepatic Impairment
Sofia, Bulgaria
View Trial DetailsNCT06575959
Digestive System Diseases, Hepatic Impairment
Orlando, Florida, United States
View Trial Details