Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01526057

A Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Study Comparing PF-05280586 To Rituximab In Subjects With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis With An Inadequate Response To TNF Inhibitors (REFLECTIONS B328-01)

In this study, patients with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis who are being treated with methotrexate will receive 2 intravenous treatments with either PF-05280586 or Rituxan (Rituximab) or MabThera (Rituximab). During the course of the study, the effects of the drugs will be assessed by sampling the levels of drug in the blood, blood cell counts, and by comparing these levels among the different treatments. Safety, tolerability and immunologic response also will be evaluated throughout.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 2

Primary location

Rheumatology Research Unit, Maroochydore, Queensland, Australia

Loading trial locations.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Confirmed diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis
  • Meets Class I, II or III of the ACR 1991 Revised Criteria
  • RA seropositivity
  • Stable dose of methotrexate
  • Inadequate response to TNF inhibitors

Exclusion criteria

  • Any prior treatment with lymphocyte depleting therapies
  • History of active TB infection
  • Known or screen test positive for specific viruses or indicators of viral infection

Treatment and study plan

PF-05280586

Biological

1000 mg, IV on days 1 and 15

MabThera

Biological

1000 mg, IV on days 1 and 15

Rituxan

Biological

1000 mg, IV on days 1 and 15

Primary outcomes

  1. Maximum Serum Concentration (Cmax) of Rituximab

    Time frame: Predose (Day 1) and 3, 4.25 (immediately before 1st infusion end), 72, 168, 335 (Day 15 within 1.5 hours before 2nd infusion), 337.5, 339.25 (Day 15 immediately before 2nd infusion end), 408, 504, 672, 1344, and 2016 hours after start of 1st infusion

    Cmax is the peak serum concentration of study drug (rituximab) after a dose has been administered.

  2. AUC 0-inf of Rituximab

    Time frame: Predose (Day 1) and 3, 4.25 (immediately before 1st infusion end), 72, 168, 335 (Day 15 within 1.5 hours before 2nd infusion), 337.5, 339.25 (Day 15 immediately before 2nd infusion end), 408, 504, 672, 1344, and 2016 hours after start of 1st infusion

    The AUC 0-inf refers to the concentration in serum of the drug over time. It represents the total drug exposure over time, from time 0 (the point of drug administration) extrapolated to infinity.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Rituximab AUC From Time 0 to 2 Weeks (AUC 0-2wk)

    Time frame: Predose (Day 1) and 3, 4.25 (immediately before 1st infusion end), 72, 168, 335 (Day 15 within 1.5 hours before 2nd infusion), 337.5, 339.25 (Day 15 immediately before 2nd infusion end), 408, 504, 672, 1344, and 2016 hours after start of 1st infusion

    The AUC 0-2wk refers to the concentration in serum of the drug over time. It represents the total drug exposure over time, from time 0 (the point of drug administration) to 2 weeks after drug administration.

  2. Rituximab AUC From Time 0 to the Time of the Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUC 0-T)

    Time frame: Predose (Day 1) and 3, 4.25 (immediately before 1st infusion end), 72, 168, 335 (Day 15 within 1.5 hours before 2nd infusion), 337.5, 339.25 (Day 15 immediately before 2nd infusion end), 408, 504, 672, 1344, and 2016 hours after start of 1st infusion

    The AUC 0-T refers to the concentration in serum of the drug over time. It represents the total drug exposure over time, from time 0 (the point of drug administration) to the last measured concentration at time T.

  3. CD19+ B-cell Count AUC From Time 0 to the Last Measurement at Time T (AUC 0-T,B-cell)

    Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 2, 3, 5, 9, 13, 17, 21 and 25 (EOT)

    The AUC 0-T,B-cell refers to the concentration in serum of B-cells. It represents the total B-cells over time from time 0 (the point of drug administration) to the last measurement taken at time T.

  4. Minimum Post-Baseline CD19+ B-cell Count (/uL)

    Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 2, 3, 5, 9, 13, 17, 21 and 25 (EOT)

    The lowest CD19+ B-cell count measured in a participant's blood post-baseline.

  5. Time to Minimum Post-Baseline CD19+ B-cell Count (Weeks)

    Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 2, 3, 5, 9, 13, 17, 21 and 25 (EOT)

    The amount of time in weeks from baseline to the lowest observed CD19+ B-cell count.

  6. Duration of B-cell Depletion (τB-cell) (Days)

    Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 2, 3, 5, 9, 13, 17, 21 and 25 (EOT)

    The τB-cell is defined as the time interval over which the B-cell count was <0.3 cells/uL or the detection limit.

  7. Percentage of Participants With CD19+ B-cell Count Recovery

    Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 2, 3, 5, 9, 13, 17, 21 and 25

    The percentage of participants with CD19+ B-cell counts which fell to <50% of Baseline value during treatment and which recovered to ≥50% of Baseline value at End of Treatment.

  8. Area Under the CD19+ B-cell Count Concentration-time Profile (AUC 0-T, B-cell)

    Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 2, 3, 5, 9, 13, 17, 21 and 25 (EOT)

    The AUC 0-T, B-cell refers to the CD19+ B-cell count over time. It represents the total B-cells over time, from time 0 (the point of drug administration) to the last measured count at time T.

  9. Baseline and Change From Baseline in Circulating Immunoglobulin-M (IgM) by Visit (Grams Per Liter (g/L])

    Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 9, 13, 17, 21 and 25 (EOT)

    The level of IgM in serum at Baseline and the change from Baseline at each subsequent visit.

  10. Percent (%) Change From Baseline in Circulating IgM by Visit (g/L)

    Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 9, 13, 17, 21 and 25

    The percentage change from Baseline in circulating IgM by visit.

  11. Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20% Improvement (ACR20) Response by Visit

    Time frame: Weeks 3, 5, 9, 13, 17, 21 and 25

    ACR20 response: greater than or equal to (≥)20% improvement in tender joint count; ≥20% improvement in swollen joint count; and ≥20% improvement in at least 3 of 5 remaining ACR core measures: participant assessment of pain; participant global assessment of disease activity; physician global assessment of disease activity; self-assessed disability (disability index of the Health Assessment Questionnaire [HAQ]); and C-Reactive Protein (CRP).

    Non-responder imputation categorized participants as having a non-response if they did not have data available at a visit due to missing data or study discontinuation. Participants who rolled over to the extension study were not included in the non-responder imputation from that point on.

  12. Percentage of Participants With ACR 70% Improvement (ACR70) Response by Visit

    Time frame: Weeks 3, 5, 9, 13, 17, 21 and 25 (EOT)

    ACR70 response: ≥70% improvement in tender joint count; ≥70% improvement in swollen joint count; and ≥70% improvement in at least 3 of 5 remaining ACR core measures: participant assessment of pain; participant global assessment of disease activity; physician global assessment of disease activity; self-assessed disability (disability index of the HAQ); and CRP.

    Non-responder imputation categorized participants as having a non-response if they did not have data available at a visit due to missing data or study discontinuation. Participantss who rolled over to the extension study were not included in the non-responder imputation from that point on.

  13. Percentage of Participants With ACR 50% Improvement (ACR50) Response by Visit

    Time frame: Weeks 3, 5, 9, 13, 17, 21 and 25

    ACR50 response: ≥50% improvement in tender joint count; ≥50% improvement in swollen joint count; and ≥50% improvement in at least 3 of 5 remaining ACR core measures: participant assessment of pain; participant global assessment of disease activity; physician global assessment of disease activity; self-assessed disability (disability index of the HAQ); and CRP.

    Non-responder imputation categorized participants as having a non-response if they did not have data available at a visit due to missing data or study discontinuation. Participants who rolled over to the extension study were not included in the non-responder imputation from that point on.

  14. Percentage of Participants by Anti-drug Antibody (ADA) Status

    Time frame: Days 1 up to Day 169.

    Presence of anti-rituximab antibodies in blood. Participants with a positive antibody status at any time during the study were defined as having overall positive antibody status; participants with a negative antibody status throughout the study were defined as having overall negative antibody status.

  15. Percentage of Participants With Neutralizing Antibody (NAb) in Participants With a Positive ADA by Visit

    Time frame: Day 1 up to Day 169

  16. Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score Based on 28-Joint Count and C-Reactive Protein (DAS28-CRP)

    Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 3, 5, 9, 13, 17, 21 and 25

    DAS28-CRP was calculated from the swollen joint count and tender joint count using the 28 joints count and CRP (mg/L). Total score range: 0 to 9.4, higher score indicated more disease activity. DAS28-CRP less than or equal to (≤)3.2 implied low disease activity, DAS28-CRP greater than (>)3.2 to ≤5.1 implied moderate to high disease activity, and DAS28-CRP less than (<)2.6 implied remission.

  17. Percent Change From Baseline in DAS28-CRP by Visit

    Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 3, 5, 9, 13, 17, 21 and 25

    DAS28-CRP was calculated from the swollen joint count and tender joint count using the 28 joints count and CRP (mg/L). Total score range: 0 to 9.4, higher score indicated more disease activity. DAS28-CRP less than or equal to (≤)3.2 implied low disease activity, DAS28-CRP greater than (>)3.2 to ≤5.1 implied moderate to high disease activity, and DAS28-CRP less than (<)2.6 implied remission.

  18. Percentage of Participants With Good European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response Based on Disease Activity Score Based on 28-Joint Count (DAS28) by Visit

    Time frame: Weeks 3, 5, 9, 13, 17, 21 and 25

    The DAS28-based EULAR response criteria were used to measure individual response as none, good, and moderate, depending on the extent of change from baseline and the level of disease activity reached. Good responders: change from baseline >1.2 with DAS28 ≤3.2; moderate responders: change from baseline >1.2 with DAS28 >3.2 to ≤5.1 or change from baseline >0.6 to ≤1.2 with DAS28 ≤5.1; non-responders: change from baseline ≤0.6, or change from baseline >0.6 and ≤1.2 with DAS28 >5.1.

  19. Percentage of Participants With Moderate EULAR Response Based on Disease Activity Score Based on DAS28 by Visit

    Time frame: Weeks 3, 5, 9, 13, 17, 21 and 25

    The DAS28-based EULAR response criteria were used to measure individual response as none, good, and moderate, depending on the extent of change from baseline and the level of disease activity reached. Good responders: change from baseline >1.2 with DAS28 ≤3.2; moderate responders: change from baseline >1.2 with DAS28 >3.2 to ≤5.1 or change from baseline >0.6 to ≤1.2 with DAS28 ≤5.1; non-responders: change from baseline ≤0.6, or change from baseline >0.6 and ≤1.2 with DAS28 >5.1.

  20. Percentage of Participants With No EULAR Response Based on DAS28 by Visit

    Time frame: Weeks 3, 5, 9, 13, 17, 21 and 25

    The DAS28-based EULAR response criteria were used to measure individual response as none, good, and moderate, depending on the extent of change from baseline and the level of disease activity reached. Good responders: change from baseline >1.2 with DAS28 ≤3.2; moderate responders: change from baseline >1.2 with DAS28 >3.2 to ≤5.1 or change from baseline >0.6 to ≤1.2 with DAS28 ≤5.1; non-responders: change from baseline ≤0.6, or change from baseline >0.6 and ≤1.2 with DAS28 >5.1.

  21. Percentage of Participants With Low Disease Activity Score (DAS <=3.2) by Visit

    Time frame: Weeks 3, 5, 9, 13, 17, 21 and 25

    DAS28-CRP was calculated from the swollen joint count and tender joint count using the 28 joints count and CRP (mg/L). Total score range: 0 to 9.4, higher score indicated more disease activity. DAS28-CRP ≤3.2 implied low disease activity. p-value of 9999 indicates p-value is not applicable.

  22. Percentage of Participants With DAS Remission (DAS <2.6) by Visit

    Time frame: Weeks 3, 5, 9, 13, 17, 21 and 25

    DAS28-CRP was calculated from the swollen joint count and tender joint count using the 28 joints count and CRP (mg/L). Total score range: 0 to 9.4, higher score indicated more disease activity. DAS28-CRP <2.6 implied remission. p-value of 9999 indicates p-value is not applicable.

  23. Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) by Visit

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 3, 5, 9, 13, 17, 21 and 25

    HAQ-DI: participant-reported assessment of ability to perform tasks in 8 categories of daily living activities: dress/groom; arise; eat; walk; reach; grip; hygiene; and common activities over past week. Each item scored on 4-point scale from 0 to 3: 0=no difficulty; 1=some difficulty; 2=much difficulty; 3=unable to do. Overall score was computed as the sum of domain scores and divided by the number of domains answered. Total possible score range 0-3 where 0 = least difficulty and 3 = extreme difficulty.

  24. Percent Change From Baseline in HAQ-DI Score by Visit

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 3, 5, 9, 13, 17, 21 and 25

    HAQ-DI: participant-reported assessment of ability to perform tasks in 8 categories of daily living activities: dress/groom; arise; eat; walk; reach; grip; hygiene; and common activities over past week. Each item scored on 4-point scale from 0 to 3: 0=no difficulty; 1=some difficulty; 2=much difficulty; 3=unable to do. Overall score was computed as the sum of domain scores and divided by the number of domains answered. Total possible score range 0-3 where 0 = least difficulty and 3 = extreme difficulty.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Pfizer

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

A RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND, STUDY COMPARING THE PHARMACOKINETICS AND PHARMACODYNAMICS, AND ASSESSING THE SAFETY OF PF-05280586 AND RITUXIMAB IN SUBJECTS WITH ACTIVE RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS ON A BACKGROUND OF METHOTREXATE WHO HAVE HAD AN INADEQUATE RESPONSE TO ONE OR MORE TNF ANTAGONIST THERAPIES

Acronym: REFLECTIONS

Important dates

Study start
2012
Primary completion
2013
Study completion
2014
First posted
Feb 3, 2012
Registry last updated
Nov 19, 2019

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.