Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Not Yet Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT06928961

A Patient Portal and PROMs to Improve Health Problem Detection and Retention in HIV Care: The DRHIVe Study

Too often, people living with HIV (PLHIV) face challenges, including additional health and psychosocial problems, that complicate self-care, like medication-taking and medical appointment attendance. Healthcare providers are not always aware when patients face these difficulties. A 'patient portal' is an online application that can give patients access to their medical records, appointment reminders, and questionnaires to inform providers about their health and wellbeing. Patient portals in HIV care can help providers detect patient problems and improve care. At the McGill University Health Centre's (MUHC) HIV care service, a survey showed great interest in a patient portal among both PLHIV and healthcare providers. Yet, little is known on how best to integrate a portal in HIV care settings and ensure it is accessible to patients. This project will be conducted at the MUHC's HIV care service in Montreal, Quebec which has over 2,000 patients. Participating patients will log on to a patient portal through a smartphone application and have a calendar of their HIV care appointments, health questionnaires to complete (previously chosen by people with HIV and healthcare providers), reminders for both and access to educational material. HIV physicians will be able to see their patients' questionnaire results to discuss them during clinic appointments. The project's objectives are to better understand what is needed to successfully integrate a portal in similar HIV practices with diverse patients and learn how acceptable and usable it is for HIV patients and doctors. The project will also examine how patient portal use impacts satisfaction, attendance, and physician detection of specific health problems. Furthemore, it will consider how patient sex, age, and ethnicity influence the results. People with HIV, providers, and staff at the study site will be involved in decision-making about this project. Over its 5-year duration, knowledge will be gained and shared on how to expand portal use efficiently and equitably in similar HIV care centers.

Not Yet Recruiting

Trial opening soon.

Get Notified

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Chronic Viral Illness Service, Division of Infectious Disease, Department of Medicine, McGill University Health Centre - Glen Site

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Location contact

Bertrand P Lebouché, MD, PhD

CONTACT

[email protected]

514-843-2090

About this study

Background HIV care involves challenges; people living with HIV (PLHIV) face greater risks of several comorbidities and psychosocial difficulties, which often impede medication adherence, appointment attendance, and other aspects of HIV self-management. For providers, detection of many of these issues (e.g., symptoms, depression, substance use) largely relies on patients reporting them and they may go untreated. Evidence shows that patient portals and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) can help improve HIV management. How best to implement and ensure equitable access to these tools is less clear.

Aims This project will deploy a patient portal with a standard set of PROMs previously chosen through HIV stakeholder consultations led by the research team (PLHIV, healthcare professionals…). The study site, the Chronic Viral Illness Service (CVIS) of the McGill University Health Centre, serves over 2,000 PLHIV and is the largest university hospital-based HIV center in Montreal, Quebec. The study trial will assess an implementation strategy and patient and physician perceptions of the intervention (Aim 1) and evaluate the effectiveness of available portal functions (patient lab results, appointment calendar, PROMs, reminders, educational material) in improving health service and patient outcomes (Aim 2). HIV stakeholders will be engaged throughout this 5-year project, with representation of underserved HIV communities.

Methods A single-site, multi-method, 24-month unblinded trial will be led, with a hybrid type 2 effectiveness-implementation design and progressive intervention roll-out to all participants. Nine HIV physicians will participate with 360 of their patients, setting targets for sex, age, and race/ethnicity (factors tied to differential portal use). Patients will be trained to use the portal. Appointment and PROMs-completion reminders will be automated. Patients receiving the intervention will fill out PROMs prior to meeting their HIV physician at 6-month intervals. Physicians will be trained to consult the data via an online dashboard.

For Aim 1, study questionnaires (every 6 months), will assess patient and physician satisfaction with the intervention and perceived acceptability and usability. Portal metadata, trial data (e.g., recruitment rate) and qualitative data (e.g., semi-structured interviews, coordinator fieldnotes, meeting minutes) will be analyzed, in part, to determine fidelity and feasibility. For Aim 2, outcomes will be measured every six months. Patient outcomes include satisfaction with care and medical appointment attendance which will be based on questionnaire data and study site data, respectively. Service outcomes include physician detection of health-related problems screened for with the PROMs and patient-centered care which will be obtained from physician consultation notes and questionnaire data, respectively. Data will be analyzed, in part, with an implementation framework (NASSS) and attend to equity. The engagement approach used includes an executive committee with patient-partners and physician-champions, and a patient advisory committee. The multidisciplinary research team includes experts in all relevant areas, including implementation science.

Expected outcomes This project will build knowledge on how to implement portals and PROMs efficiently and inclusively in similar HIV centers while potentially benefiting thousands of PLHIV at the CVIS.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Confirmed living with HIV
  • Adult (at least 18 years old)
  • Literate in English or French
  • Patient at the study site

Exclusion criteria

  • Cognitive impairment or medical instability that prevents participation
  • Insufficient mastery of French or English to participate (e.g., complete PROMs, study questionnaires)

Treatment and study plan

Patient portal with patient-reported outcome measure administration, appointment calendar and reminders, access to lab test results, and educational material

Other

Patients in the intervention will be trained to register on and use the patient portal. The following portal features will be used and studied in this project: the appointment calendar, PROMs administration, reminders (e.g., for appointments), educational materials, and access to personal lab results. Educational materials in the portal will include information on what to expect during HIV clinic visits, how to interpret HIV lab reports, and instructional videos on using the portal. Prior to visiting their HIV physician, patients will have continuous access to several portal features (calendar, education, and lab results, if applicable), and receive reminders (within 48 hours) of their clinic appointment and to complete the PROMs. Physicians will acquire their patients' PROM scores via the patient portal and receive training on how to do so. Patients and physicians are expected to review the PROM results and consider them during each clinic visit.

Primary outcomes

  1. Acceptability of the intervention

    Time frame: During the intervention at months 6, 12, 18, and 24

    Acceptability of the intervention is the primary implementation outcome. It will be measured with the Acceptability E-Scale. The minimum and maximum scores on this measure are 6 and 30, respectively, where higher scores mean greater acceptability.

  2. Satisfaction with care

    Time frame: At baseline, then at months 6, 12, 18 and 24

    Satisfaction with care will be the primary effectiveness outcome measure. It will be assessed with the Short Assessment of Patient Satisfaction (SAPS) measure. The minimum and maximum scores on this measure are 0 and 28, respectively, where higher scores mean greater levels of patient satisfaction.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Technology usability -Ease of use

    Time frame: During the intervention at months 6, 12, 18, and 24

    Technology usability is a secondary outcome for assessing the implementation. It will be measured in terms of Perceived ease of use (1 item, Single Ease Question). The minimum and maximum scores on this measure are 1 and 7, respectively, where higher scores mean greater ease of use.

  2. Technology usability -Perceived usefulness

    Time frame: During the intervention at months 6, 12, 18, and 24

    Technology usability is a secondary outcome for assessing the implementation. It will be measured in terms of Perceived usefulness. The minimum and maximum scores on this measure are 1 and 7, respectively, where higher scores mean greater perceived usefulness.

  3. Technology usability -Attitude

    Time frame: During the intervention at months 6, 12, 18, and 24

    Technology usability is a secondary outcome for assessing the implementation. It will be measured in terms of Attitude (likelihood to recommend the intervention). The minimum and maximum scores on this measure are 1 and 5, respectively, where higher scores mean a greater likelihood to recommend. Scores will be used to calulate the percentage of participants who are likely to recommend the intervention.

  4. Feasibility of the intervention -Consent rate

    Time frame: At baseline

    Feasibility will be assessed to evaluate the implementation. It will be measured in terms of the Consent rate (the percentage of participants who consented amongst those who were eligible and approached).

  5. Feasibility of the intervention -Retention rate

    Time frame: From baseline to 24 months

    Feasibility will be assessed to evaluate the implementation. It will be measured in terms of the participant Retention rate (the percentage of participants who enrolled in the study and completed the trial).

  6. Fidelity of the intervention -PROM completion by patients

    Time frame: During the intervention at months 6, 12, 18, and 24

    Fidelity will be assessed to evaluate the implementation. It will be measured in terms of the percentage of visits patients completed the PROMs on time.

  7. Fidelity of the intervention -PROM data reviewed by providers

    Time frame: During the intervention at months 6, 12, 18, and 24

    Fidelity will be assessed to evaluate the implementation. It will be measured in terms of the percentage of visits providers reviewed their patients' PROM results on time.

  8. Patient management -Provider detection of PROM-related problems

    Time frame: At baseline, then at months 6, 12, 18 and 24

    Patient management is a secondary effectiveness outcome. It will be measured based on the detection (or not) of each health or psychosocial problem targeted by the administered PROMs, as recorded in the physician clinical notes of participating patients.

  9. Patient-centered care

    Time frame: At baseline, then at months 6, 12, 18 and 24

    Patient-centered care is a secondary effectiveness outcome. It will be measured with the Health care process subscale (8 items) of the Revised Patient Perception of Patient-Centeredness Questionnaire (PCCC-R).The minimum and maximum scores on this measure are 1 and 4, respectively, where higher scores mean a less patient-centered health care process.

  10. Self-management -Appointment attendance

    Time frame: At baseline, then at months 6, 12, 18 and 24

    Self-management is a secondary effectiveness outcome. It will be measured in terms of the number of patients attending appointments per the study schedule, based on study site administrative data.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

David Lessard, PhD

CONTACT

[email protected]

Kim Engler, PhD

CONTACT

[email protected]

514 934-1934 ext. 32126

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre

Other

Collaborators

  • Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
  • Portail VIH/sida du Québec
  • Programme National de Mentorat sur le VIH et les Hépatites (PNMVH)
  • Unité de Soutien SSA Québec

Registry information

Official study title

Implementation of a Patient Portal and Tailored Patient-Reported Outcome Measures to Improve Health Problem Detection and Retention in HIV Care: The DRHIVe Study

Important dates

Study start
2025
Primary completion
2029
Study completion
2029
First posted
Apr 15, 2025
Registry last updated
Apr 15, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.