foley catheter
Devicefoley 14 catheter intracervical plus vaginal IMN 40 mg evry 6 hours
NCT Number: NCT01506388
The use of foley catheter was tested many times and proved to be effective for induction of labour.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–40 year
Female
Interventional
Phase 3
Cairo University, Cairo, Cairo Governorate, Egypt
The investigators compare between vaginal misoprostol versus foley catheter plus vaginal isosorbide mononitrate (IMN) for induction of labour
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
foley 14 catheter intracervical plus vaginal IMN 40 mg evry 6 hours
misoprostol 50 Ug , vaginally every 4-6 hours
Other names: misoprostol vaginally
IMN vaginal 40 mg every 4-6 hours
Time frame: 1 year
caesarean section
Time frame: 1 year
from the insertion of the foley catheter to delivery
Cairo University
Other
Foley Catheter Plus Vaginal Isosorbide Mononitrate Versus Vaginal Misoprostol for Induction of Labour:a Randomised Controlled Trial
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT02618096
Failed Induction of Labor
Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea
View Trial DetailsNCT02416583
Failed Induction of Labor
Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea
View Trial DetailsNCT01596296
Failed Induction of Labor
Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea
View Trial DetailsNCT02524002
Abnormal Labor, Acid-Base Imbalance
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
View Trial Details