Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03881982

A Novel Electronic Method of Collecting Pain Scores in the Emergency Department

Can a novel electronic display of pain be successfully used in the emergency department and does it (1) change analgesic prescription and (2) change amount of pain experienced? Pain is a common symptom in emergency care. As patients are seldom reassessed, staff may not be aware of pain. Currently, members of nursing or medical staff need to ask patients about their pain and record it manually using a visual analogue scale from 0-10.

The new electronic display uses buttons to represent a pain scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain). Patients will select the number that best corresponds to their pain every 15 minutes. In the experimental group, the score will be displayed on a screen. In the control group, the score will not be displayed. The investigators will compare the overall amount of pain in both groups, and will look at their pain management (painkillers prescribed). The investigators will also ask patients and staff for their opinions on the display.

The study will include adult patients in the emergency department at Leicester Royal Infirmary with an initial pain score of 5 or more who are able to make a decision about whether to participate. Participants will also need to be likely to stay in the hospital for more than 2 hours to allow the investigators to gather enough useful data. The study will recruit 200 participants. If the study can demonstrate that the monitor is acceptable to patients and staff and results in improved pain management, it is a low cost intervention which could be widely implemented within the NHS. It also has the potential for being used in other areas such as surgical wards. The investigators have previously found that 300-400 patients per week in the department have moderate to severe pain and might therefore benefit from this monitor.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

Pain, Acute Acute Pain Neurologic Manifestations Pain Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms Signs and Symptoms

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Leicester Royal Infirmary

Leicester, Leicestershire, LE1 5WW, United Kingdom

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • adult (18 years and over)
  • underlying condition giving rise to significant pain (initial VAS pain score of 5 or more)
  • likely to be staying in the hospital for at least 2 hours
  • willing and able to give informed consent
  • able to understand and speak a good level of English

Exclusion criteria

  • children (under 18 years)
  • patients not willing to undergo routine care (analgesic treatment)
  • patients who do not have capacity to consent
  • patients who are unwilling or unable to give informed consent
  • prisoners
  • patients who cannot understand the study information in English
  • currently participating in another clinical trial as far as can be determined from information available at the time of assessment
  • patients who have a physical or visual disability which will prevent them from holding or using the pain display

Treatment and study plan

PIMPERNEL Novel Electronic Log: Pain display can be seen

Other

Pain scores are displayed on the screen when the participant presses the corresponding button

PIMPERNEL Novel Electronic Log: Pain display is hidden

Other

Participants press the buttons to record their pain score but the score is not on display (the screen is turned backwards).

Primary outcomes

  1. Pain reported by the patient:11 point numerical pain scale

    Time frame: Up to 6 hours

    Data collected from the display using the 11 point numerical pain scale. The area under the curve will be compared between the intervention and control groups. The Numerical Rating Scale is a scale from 0-10 (whole numbers only, where 0 represents 'no pain' and 10 represents 'worst pain ever').

Secondary outcomes

  1. Proportion of possible scores recorded by patients

    Time frame: Up to 6 hours

  2. Comparison of pain recorded on the display (closest minute) with verbal pain assessment at 2 and 4 hours

    Time frame: Up to 6 hours

    The scores recorded by the participants at 2 and 4 hours into their hospital stay will be compared with the scores recorded by nursing staff in the electronic record. The 11 point numerical rating scale is used for both measurements. The Numerical Rating Scale is a scale from 0-10 (whole numbers only, where 0 represents 'no pain' and 10 represents 'worst pain ever').

  3. Understanding the pattern of pain (shape of the curve of pain scores) over the time of the ED stay

    Time frame: Up to 6 hours

  4. Recording time to second dose of analgesia and whether there is a pattern to this

    Time frame: Up to 6 hours

  5. Use of analgesia in intervention and control groups (dose, time prescribed, time administered and name)

    Time frame: Up to 6 hours

    The dose, time prescribed, time administered and name of analgesia given pre-hospital and whilst in hospital will be recorded and a comparison made between the groups. This is a feasibility study only so exact outcome depends upon what data can be collected.

  6. Opinion of patients

    Time frame: Up to 6 hours

    Uses a short (4 question) questionnaire designed for this study. Questions on ease of use, whether the monitor is a good idea, whether participants would use it again in the future and whether it improved their experience as a patient, plus a comments box.

    Questions: 1) How easy was it to use the pain monitor? (very easy, easy, no opinion, difficult, very difficult) 2) I think that the pain monitor is a good idea (strongly agree, agree, no opinion, disagree, strongly disagree) 3) I would use the monitor again in the future (strongly agree, agree, no opinion, disagree, strongly disagree) 4) The pain monitor improved my experience as a patient (strongly agree, agree, no opinion, disagree, strongly disagree)

  7. Opinion of staff (including their opinion of whether patients press the button for reasons other than pain)

    Time frame: Up to 6 hours

    Short (4 question) questionnaire designed for the study. Questions on whether the display is practical to use in the Emergency Department, whether they think it is a good idea, whether it is likely to improve the patient experience and whether a patient used the display to get their attention for a reason other than pain. Also has a comments box.

    Questions: 1) The pain display is practical to use in the Emergency Department (strongly agree, agree, no opinion, disagree, strongly disagree) 2) I think that the pain display is a good idea (strongly agree, agree, no opinion, disagree, strongly disagree) 3) The pain display is likely to improve the patient experience (strongly agree, agree, no opinion, disagree, strongly disagree) 4) A patient used the pain display to get my attention for a reason other than pain (yes, not sure, no)

  8. Opinion of researchers regarding any likely stratification needs

    Time frame: Up to 6 hours

    Subjective opinion of researchers having completed the study on whether stratification would be required in future studies. No specific measurement used.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of Leicester

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Patient Input Monitoring of Pain in the Emergency Room: Novel Electronic Log (PIMPERNEL). A Randomised Controlled Trial of an Electronic Pain Score Display in Adults in the Emergency Department

Acronym: PIMPERNEL

Important dates

Study start
2017
Primary completion
2019
Study completion
2019
First posted
Mar 20, 2019
Registry last updated
Jan 30, 2020

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Related clinical trials

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.