Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT06946160

A Non-inferiority Clinical Trial to Compare Efficacy and Safety of Abobotulinumtoxin A (Espad Pharmed) Versus AbobotulinumtoxinA (Dysport®, Ipsen Co.) for Correction of Moderate to Severe Glabellar Lines

The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of AbobotulinumtoxinA (produced by Espad Pharmed Darou Co.) for correction of moderate to severe glabellar lines.

Hypothesis: AbobotulinumtoxinA (produced by Espad Pharmed Darou Co.) has acceptable efficacy and safety profile for correction of moderate to severe glabellar lines.

Primary Outcome: To verify the non-inferiority of the efficacy of AbobotulinumtoxinA (produced by Espad Pharmed Darou Co.) compared with AbobotulinumtoxinA (Dysport®, produced by Ipsen Co.) by percentage of responders at maximum frown at day 30 after treatment.

Researchers will compare the efficacy and safety profile of AbobotulinumtoxinA (produced by Espad Pharmed Darou Co.) with AbobotulinumtoxinA (Dysport®, produced by Ipsen Co.).

The study is designed as phase III, randomized, two armed, double-blind, parallel, active controlled, non-inferiority clinical trial.

Participants received a total dose of 40-60 units into 3 to 5 sites. After two weeks, a touch-up intervention could be done based on physician's assessment.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–65 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 3

Primary location

Center for Research and Training in Skin Diseases And Leprosy

Tehran, Tehran Province, Iran

About this study

The study schedule includes Visit 0 (Screening), Visit 1 (Intervention, Day 0), and Follow-up Visits 2 (Day 14), 3 (Day 30), 4 (Day 90), and 5 (Day 120). At Visit 0, informed consent is obtained, and eligibility is assessed through initial evaluations and review of inclusion and exclusion criteria. At Visit 1, subjects are randomized (1:1) and receive the investigational treatment. Full-face photographs are obtained at Visit 1 (Before receiving the investigational treatment), and at Follow-up Visits 2, 3, 4, and 5, in both resting state and maximum frown. Efficacy is evaluated at Visits 3, 4, and 5. All adverse events are Recorded at all visits.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Male or female ≥18 to ≤65 years of age
  • Willingness for signing and having signed the informed consent form
  • Moderate to severe glabellar wrinkle at maximum frown based on glabellar lines severity scale (GLSS)
  • be able to participate in the visit schedules and the study procedures.

Exclusion criteria

  • Hypersensitivity to botulinum toxin or any other component of the formulation, as well as to injectable fillers in the facial region.
  • Previous treatment with botulinum toxin in facial areas within the past 6 months.
  • Previous treatment with dermal fillers, dermabrasion, or photo rejuvenation in the glabellar region within the past 12 months.
  • History of dermal filler injection in the forehead region within the past year.
  • History of eyebrow tattooing or any other procedure involving the eyebrow area within the past month.
  • Use of aminoglycosides, penicillamine, quinine, chloroquine, hydroxychloroquine, or calcium channel blockers within the past week.
  • Use of anticoagulants or aspirin within the past 10 days (participants are not required to discontinue their anticoagulant therapy to be enrolled in the study).
  • History of any cosmetic surgery (e.g., filler injections, chemical peels, or laser treatments) or use of products that induce skin remodeling or significantly affect the forehead area or its surroundings, including any aesthetic procedure involving the glabellar lines within the past 6 months.
  • History of any surgical procedure involving facial muscles or scarring in the forehead or surrounding areas (including the eyebrows).
  • Any planned aesthetic procedure involving the upper face during the course of the study.
  • Presence of disorders that may affect neuromuscular function (e.g., myasthenia gravis, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis [ALS], or Eaton-Lambert syndrome).
  • History of facial nerve paralysis.
  • Presence of clearly visible and defined facial asymmetry.
  • Ptosis of the eyelids or eyebrows due to facial muscle paralysis or a history thereof.
  • Presence of any active infection or acute dermatological condition in the injection areas.
  • Pregnancy (confirmed by urine test) or lactation.
  • Participation in other clinical studies within 30 days prior to randomization or intention to participate in other clinical trials.
  • Any other condition or circumstance that may pose a risk to the participant or interfere with the satisfactory completion of the clinical outcome.
  • History of participation in other clinical trials involving botulinum neurotoxin products or fillers within the past 6 months.

Treatment and study plan

Abobotulinumtoxin A (Espad Pharmed Darou Co.)

Drug

Vial of Abobotulinumtoxin A (produced by Espad Pharmed Darou Co.), administered via deep intramuscular injection

Abobotulinumtoxin A (Ipsen Co.)

Drug

Vial of AbobotulinumtoxinA (Dysport®, produced by Ipsen Co.), administered via deep intramuscular injection

Primary outcomes

  1. Responders at maximum frown by investigator's assessment

    Time frame: Day 30

    Percentage of responders measured by the investigator's live assessment based on Glabellar Line Severity Scale (GLSS) at maximum frown at day 30 after treatment The Glabellar Line Severity Scale (GLSS) is a 4-grade scale defined as follows: 0 = no glabellar lines, 1 = mild lines, 2 = moderate lines, 3 = severe lines. Higher scores indicate more severe glabellar lines. Participants were considered responders if they showed a reduction of at least 2 points from baseline on the scale.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Responders at rest by investigator's assessment

    Time frame: Days 30, 90 and 120

    Percentage of responders measured by the investigator's live assessment based on Glabellar Line Severity Scale (GLSS) at rest at days 30, 90 and 120 after treatment The Glabellar Line Severity Scale (GLSS) is a 4-grade scale defined as follows: 0 = no glabellar lines, 1 = mild lines, 2 = moderate lines, 3 = severe lines. Higher scores indicate more severe glabellar lines. Participants were considered responders if they showed a reduction of at least 2 points from baseline on the scale.

  2. Responders at maximum frown by subject's self-assessment

    Time frame: days 30, 90 and 120

    Percentage of responders measured by the subject's self-assessment (SSA) at maximum frown at days 30, 90 and 120 after treatment The 4-grade subject's self-assessment scale defined as follows: 0 = no glabellar lines, 1 = mild lines, 2 = moderate lines, 3 = severe lines. Higher scores indicate more severe glabellar lines. Responders are defined as those reporting a reduction of at least 2 points from baseline.

  3. Responders at rest by subject's self-assessment

    Time frame: days 30, 90 and 120

    Percentage of responders measured by the subject's self-assessment (SSA) at rest at days 30, 90 and 120 after treatment The 4-grade subject's self-assessment scale defined as follows: 0 = no glabellar lines, 1 = mild lines, 2 = moderate lines, 3 = severe lines. Higher scores indicate more severe glabellar lines. Responders are defined as those reporting a reduction of at least 2 points from baseline.

  4. Responders at maximum frown by investigator's assessment

    Time frame: days 90 and 120

    Percentage of responders measured by the investigator's live assessment based on Glabellar Line Severity Scale (GLSS) at maximum frown at days 90 and 120 after treatment The Glabellar Line Severity Scale (GLSS) is a 4-grade scale defined as follows: 0 = no glabellar lines, 1 = mild lines, 2 = moderate lines, 3 = severe lines. Higher scores indicate more severe glabellar lines. Participants were considered responders if they showed a reduction of at least 2 points from baseline on the scale.

  5. Total injected dose (visit 1 and touch-up visit)

    Time frame: Day 14

  6. Onset of action measured by the subject's self-assessment (SSA) at rest

    Time frame: Day 14

    The participants were asked to record the date on which they first noticed the onset of the product's efficacy and to inform the investigator of this date during the visit on day 14.

  7. Onset of action measured by the subject's self-assessment (SSA) at maximum frown

    Time frame: Day 14

    The participants were asked to record the date on which they first noticed the onset of the product's efficacy and to inform the investigator of this date during the visit on day 14.

  8. Safety assessment by evaluation of adverse events (AEs)

    Time frame: Visit 0 (screening), visit 1 (Day 0), visit 2 (Day 14), visit 3 (Day 30), visit 4 (Day 90), visit 5 (Day 120)

    Adverse events (AEs) were assessed at all visits. All reported events were classified as mild, moderate, or severe. Moreover, seriousness of Adverse events was assessed according to International Council for Harmonization (ICH-E2B) guidelines. The causality relation was assessed based on the World Health Organization (WHO) criteria.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Espad Pharmed

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

A Phase I/III, Randomized, Two-armed, Double-blinded, Parallel, Active-controlled, Non-inferiority Clinical Trial to Compare Efficacy and Safety of AbobotulinumtoxinA (Espad Pharmed) Versus AbobotulinumtoxinA (Dysport®, Ipsen Co.) for Correction of Moderate to Severe Glabellar Lines

Important dates

Study start
2024
Primary completion
2025
Study completion
2025
First posted
Apr 27, 2025
Registry last updated
May 7, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.