Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT00502996

A Non-Comparative Study to Assess the Safety of MabThera (Rituximab) in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis.

This single arm study will assess the safety of MabThera plus methotrexate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis who have had a lack of response to 1-5 DMARDs or biological agents. Patients will receive MabThera (1g i.v.) on days 1 and 15, concomitantly with methotrexate >=15mg p.o./week. The anticipated time on study treatment is 3-12 months, and the target sample size is 100-500 individuals.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 3

Primary location

Buenos Aires, Argentina

Loading trial locations.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • adult patients, >=18 years of age;
  • rheumatoid arthritis >=6 months;
  • lack of response to 1-5 DMARDs or biological agents;
  • rheumatoid factor positive.

Exclusion criteria

  • other chronic inflammatory articular disease or systemic rheumatic disease;
  • joint or bone surgery during 8 weeks prior to randomization;
  • previous treatment with any cell-depleting therapy.

Treatment and study plan

methotrexate

Drug

>=15 mg po/week

rituximab [MabThera/Rituxan]

Drug

1g iv on days 1 and 15

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With Any Adverse Event, Any Serious Adverse Event, and Death

    Time frame: Up to Week 48

    An Adverse event (AE) was considered any unfavorable medical event in a participant of clinical research who received the study drug and that not necessarily had a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE could, therefore, being any unfavorable sign and non-intentional, symptom or disease temporarily related with the use of a medicinal product, considered or not related to the medicinal product. Pre-existing conditions that worsened during the study were reported as AEs. A serious adverse event (SAE) is any experience that suggested a significant risk, contraindication, caution, and at any dose fulfills at least one of the following criteria: adverse event considered as fatal (resulting in death), life threatening, defect of birth/congenital abnormality, required hospitalization or extension of hospital length of stay, significant medical intervention, resulted in significant disability/impairment.

  2. Number of Participants With AEs According to Degree of Intensity

    Time frame: Up to Week 48

    An AE is any unfavorable sign and non-intentional, symptom or disease temporarily related with the use of a medicinal product, considered or not related to the medicinal product. Pre-existing conditions that worsened during the study were reported as AEs. The Intensity of AEs was classified as Grade 1, Grade 2, Grade 3 and Grade 4. Grade 1: Discomfort was noticed, but the normal daily activity was not interrupted. Grade 2: Discomfort was enough to reduce the normal daily activity. Grade 3: There was disability for work or develop normal daily activities. Grade 4: It represented an immediate threat to life (these events were reported as SAEs).

  3. Number of Participants With AEs Leading to Discontinuation and Any Drug Related AEs and SAEs

    Time frame: Up to Week 48

    An AE is any unfavorable sign and non-intentional, symptom or disease temporarily related with the use of a medicinal product, considered or not related to the medicinal product. Pre-existing conditions that worsened during the study were reported as AEs. A SAE is any experience that suggested a significant risk, contraindication, caution, and at any dose, fulfills, at least, one of the following criteria: adverse event considered as fatal (resulting in death), life threatening, defect of birth/congenital abnormality, required hospitalization or extension of hospital length of stay, significant medical intervention, resulted in significant disability/impairment. Relationship between AEs and medication under investigation was evaluated through the classification "Yes" and "No". A relationship classified as "Yes" implied a significant causal relationship with the medication under investigation which was evaluated based on enough evidences, facts or arguments.

  4. Number of Participants With AEs of Special Interest During the Study

    Time frame: Screening (Days -28 to 0), EOT (Week 24), and EOFU (Week 48)

    Adverse event of special interest during the study treatment and follow up period included infections. The participants with AEs of special interest were reported at Screening, End of treatment (EOT), and End of Follow-up (EOFU) visit.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Mean Values of Hematology Parameters at Screening and EOT Visit (Hemoglobin and Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin Concentration)

    Time frame: Screening (Days -28 to 0) and EOT (Week 24)

    The values of hemoglobin (Hb) and mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration (MCHC) for each participant were estimated at Screening and at EOT visit.

  2. Mean Values of Hematology Parameters at Screening and EOT Visit (Hematocrit, Neutrophils, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Eosinophils, and Basophils)

    Time frame: Screening (Days -28 to 0) and EOT (Week 24)

    The hematology parameters (hematocrit, neutrophils, lymphocytes, monocytes, eosinophils, and basophils) for each participant were estimated at Screening and at EOT.

  3. Mean Values of Hematology Parameter at Screening and EOT Visit (Mean Corpuscular Volume)

    Time frame: Screening (Days -28 to 0) and EOT (Week 24)

    Mean corpuscular volume (MCV) is the average volume of red cells. The mean MCV concentration for each participant was estimated at Screening and EOT.

  4. Mean Values of Hematology Parameter at Screening and EOT Visit (Erythrocytes)

    Time frame: Screening (Days -28 to 0) and EOT (Week 24)

    The mean erythrocyte concentration for each participant was estimated at Screening and at EOT.

  5. Mean Values of Hematology Parameters at Screening and EOT Visit (Leucocytes and Platelets)

    Time frame: Screening (Days -28 to 0) and EOT (Week 24)

    The mean leucocytes and platelets concentration for each participant was estimated at Screening, at EOT visit.

  6. Mean Values of Biochemistry Parameters at Screening and Visit 8 (Albumin and Glucose)

    Time frame: Screening (Days -28 to 0) and EOT (Week 24)

    The mean albumin and glucose concentration for each participant was estimated at Screening and at EOT visit.

  7. Mean Values of Cholesterol, Uric Acid, Urea, Creatinine, Calcium, Total Bilirubin and Serum Total Proteins at Screening and EOT Visit.

    Time frame: Screening (Days -28 to 0) and EOT (Week 24)

    The mean concentration of cholesterol, uric acid, urea, creatinine, calcium, total bilirubin and serum total proteins (STP) for each participant was estimated at Screening and at EOT visit.

  8. Mean Values of Potassium, Chlorine, Sodium, and Phosphorus at Screening and EOT Visit

    Time frame: Screening (Days -28 to 0) and EOT (Week 24)

    The mean concentration of potassium, chlorine, sodium and phosphorus for each participant was estimated at Screening and at EOT.

  9. Mean Values of Aspartate Transaminase, Alanine Transaminase, Alkaline Phosphatase, and Lactic Dehydrogenase at Screening and EOT Visit

    Time frame: Screening (Days -28 to 0) and EOT (Week 24)

    The mean aspartate transaminase (AST) and alanine transaminase (ALT), Alkaline phosphatase (AP), and Lactic dehydrogenase (LDH) concentration for each participant was estimated at Screening and at EOT visit.

  10. Mean Duration of Morning Joint Stiffness

    Time frame: Screening ((Days -28 to 0), EOT (Week 24), and EOFU (Week 48)

    The efficacy of rituximab was assessed by evaluating mean duration of morning joint stiffness.

  11. Mean Value of Painful Joints

    Time frame: Screening (Days -28 to 0), EOT (Week 24), and EOFU (Week 48)

    The efficacy of rituximab was assessed by evaluating painful joints.

  12. Number of Participants With American College of Rheumatology (20, 50, and 70) Criteria

    Time frame: Week 1, Week 12, and Week 24

    American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria improvement consisting of 20%, 50%, and 70% (ACR20, ACR50, and ACR70, respectively) reduction in tender joints and swollen joints, as well as for three of the additional five ACR core set variables: patient's assessment of pain using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) with left end of the line 0=no pain to right end of the line 100=unbearable pain); patient's global assessment of disease activity and physician's global assessment of disease activity using a VAS (0=no disease activity to 100=maximum disease activity); health assessment questionnaire (20 questions, 8 components: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and activities, 0=without difficulty to 3=unable to do; and acute-phase reactant; C-reactive protein and globular sedimentation velocity.

  13. Mean Value of Quality of Life (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index)

    Time frame: Screening (Days -28 to 0), Week 1, Week 12, and Week 24

    Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) indicates how the disease affected participant's activities of daily life. It consisted of 20 questions in 8 domains (dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip; common daily activities) rated on a 4-point scale, 0=without any difficulty to 3=unable to do. Sum of scores was divided by number of domains with a score for a total possible score of 0 (best/no difficulties to perform activities) to 3 (worst/ unable to perform activities at all).

  14. Mean Values of C Reactive Protein

    Time frame: Screening ((Days -28 to 0), EOT (Week 24), and EOFU (Week 48)

    C Reactive Protein (CRP) is a component of ACR. CRP is a marker of inflammation.

  15. Mean Values of Globular Sedimentation Velocity

    Time frame: Screening ((Days -28 to 0), Week 1, Week 12, and Week 24

    Globular sedimentation velocity is a component of ACR.

  16. Mean Values of Pain and Activity Based on Visual Analogue Scale

    Time frame: Screening ((Days -28 to 0), Week 1, Week 12, and Week 24

    Pain assessment was assessed by using a VAS (0=no pain to 100=unbearable pain). Disease activity was also evaluated by participants and investigators by using a VAS (0=no disease activity to 100=maximum disease activity).

  17. Mean Value of Inflamed Joints

    Time frame: Screening (Days -28 to 0), EOT (Week 24), and EOFU (Week 48)

    The efficacy of rituximab was assessed by evaluating inflamed joints.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Hoffmann-La Roche

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

Multicenter Non-Comparative Expanded Access Program of to Assess Safety of Rituximab (Mab Anti Cd-20) in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis (Ser)

Important dates

Study start
2006
Primary completion
2008
Study completion
2008
First posted
Jul 18, 2007
Registry last updated
Oct 14, 2016

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.