Persona total knee system
Device314 participants with knee osteoarthritis set to receive primary total knee arthroplasty will receive either Persona knee or the Nexgen
Other names: Zimmer Biomet Persona total knee system
NCT Number: NCT03073941
A multicenter, prospective randomized controlled trial comparing the Persona knee system to the Nexgen knee system in total knee arthroplasty.
This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Dept. of Orthopaedic Surgery, Farsø Sygehus, Ålborg Universitetshospital, Aalborg, Denmark
Knee replacement is an established treatment for late stage osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee. There is an increasing demand for joint replacement in a younger population. Due to the changing demographics of joint replacement, the population of younger patients are seeking options that not only correct their disease or deformity, but do not limit them in activity. Studies have shown that modern implant designs can potentially improve outcome. Therefore new implants are introduced to the marked with the theoretical benefit of improved implant survival and superior patient reported outcomes. Within Total knee arthroplasty, design changes are introduced in an attempt to improve knee kinematics, functionality and outcome, but those potential improvements need to be evaluated.
The NexGen Total Knee System is a knee replacement system with well a documented performance and has been the device of choice in many institutions. Recently, Zimmer-Biomet have introduced Persona Total Knee system with design changes that include asymmetric tibia plate, increased medial pivoting and more extensive choices in respect to poly thickness, all with the purpose to improve balancing, stability and longevity. Such design changes and proposed benefits need to be evaluated in a prospective clinical trial, with focus on patient safety, satisfaction and implant durability.
The aim is to evaluate intra-operative and postop complications, long-term survivorship and patient reported outcome measures following primary total knee replacement using Persona Cruciate Retaining (CR) total Knee system compared to NexGen Cruciate Retaining (CR) total Knee System.
This project is carried out as a 2-arm randomized controlled single-blinded trial. A total of 314 participants are to be included at 6 centers in Denmark. Participants are seen on an outpatient basis at 3 months and 1 and 2 years postoperatively. After 2-year follow-up the patients will be followed for survivorship through the Danish Knee Arthroplasty Registry.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
314 participants with knee osteoarthritis set to receive primary total knee arthroplasty will receive either Persona knee or the Nexgen
Other names: Zimmer Biomet Persona total knee system
314 participants with knee osteoarthritis set to receive primary total knee arthroplasty will receive either Persona knee or the Nexgen
Other names: Zimmer Biomet Nexgen total knee system
Time frame: 3 months, 1 year and 2 years postoperatively
The OKS is a patient-reported outcome questionnaire that was developed to specifically assess the patient's perspective of outcome following TKA. The OKS consists of twelve questions covering function and pain associated with the knee. To calculate the total score, each question is scored from 0 (worst outcome) to 4 (best outcome) and the sum of all 12 items is reported with a maximum of 48, representing the best score possible. The outcome score can be categorized as Excellent: > 41; Good: 34 - 41; Fair: 27 - 33; Poor: < 27
Time frame: 3 months, 1 year and 2 years postoperatively
The OKS-APQ is an 8 item questionnaire with each question scored from 0 (worst outcome) to 4 (best outcome). The resulting score is then summed and converted to a score ranging from 0 (worst possible score) to a maximum of 100 (best possible score).
Time frame: 3 months, 1 year and 2 years postoperatively
The FJS-12 is a patient-reported outcome questionnaire that was developed to specifically assess the patient's level of awareness of the joint during daily activities. The FJS consists of twelve questions covering function and pain associated with the knee. For each question, there is a choice of five answers between never (0), almost never (1), seldom (2), sometimes (3) and mostly (4). All scores are summed up and divided by the number of completed items. This value is then multiplied by 25 and thereafter subtracted from 100. An outcome score of 100 (highest possible score) indicates the lowest level of joint awareness, while a total score of 0 indicates the highest level of joint awareness.
Time frame: 3 months, 1 year and 2 years postoperatively
Patients were asked to answer the following satisfaction/anchoring question: "How are your knee problems now, compared to prior to your operation?"
Time frame: 3 months, 1 year and 2 years postoperatively
Patients were asked to answer the following satisfaction/anchoring question: "Taking into account all the activities you have during your daily life, your level of pain and functional impairment, do you consider that your current state is satisfactory?"
Time frame: 3 months, 1 year and 2 years postoperatively
Patients were asked to answer the following satisfaction/anchoring question: "If you answered No, i.e. not satisfied to the result would you consider your current state as being so unsatisfactory that you think the treatment has failed?"
Time frame: 3 months, 1 year and 2 years postoperatively
Patients were asked to answer the following satisfaction/anchoring question: "Would you have your knee operated again?"
Time frame: 3 months, 1 year and 2 years postoperatively
The EQ-5D is a standardized instrument widely used to measure health status. It is a self-reported assessment about the patient's quality of life composed of two parts: a questionnaire and a visual analogue scale (VAS). The questionnaire includes 5 questions referring to mobility, self-care, daily/usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression.
For EQ-5D-3L, each question can be answered in three ways, indicating no, moderate, or extreme pain. In the derived EQ-5D-3L score, the highest score is 1 and the lowest score is -0.59; negative numbers correspond to a self-assessed health state worse than being dead.
Time frame: Immediate postoperative and 3 months, 1 year and 2 years postoperatively
All X-rays were sent to an independent radiographer. Postoperative lucency was determined as presence of radiolucent intervals at the cement-bone interface. Femoral lucency and tibial lucency are reported separately.
Time frame: 5, 7 and 10 years postoperatively.
Registry data at 5, 7 and 10 years postoperatively.
Zimmer Biomet
Industry
A Multicenter Prospective Randomized Control Study on Persona Total Knee System vs NexGen Total Knee System in Total Knee Arthroplasty
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05349682
Arthritis, Joint Diseases
Charleston, South Carolina, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05787821
Arthritis, Arthritis, Rheumatoid
Parker, Colorado, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03466476
Arthritis, Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee
Miami, Florida, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT02440672
Arthritis, Joint Diseases
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
View Trial Details