Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis (OLVG)
Amsterdam, Netherlands
NCT Number: NCT05964959
The goal of this cluster based intervention trial is to evaluate the effect of a nurse-led patient education program on dry mouth in patients with a life-limiting condition or frailty.
The Mouth Educational Program (MEP) is a nurse-led patient education program, in which trained nurses use current clinical, palliative dry mouth guidelines in a structured manner to discuss causes, consequences and interventions with the patients and to create an appropriate treatment plan. This intervention will be compared to a control group receiving care as usual.
Therefore, the main question it aims to answer is:
Does a nurse-led patient education program reduce dry mouth complaints in patients with a life-limiting condition or frailty?
Participants will be asked to answer questionnaires and, when part of the intervention group, partake in the Mouth Educational Program (MEP).
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Amsterdam, Netherlands
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
The Mouth Educational Program is a nurse-led patient education program for dry mouth in patients with a life-limiting condition or frailty.
Care as usual is defined as the standard dry mouth care as provided by participants' own treating physicians.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 4
A responder is defined as a participant with a clinically relevant response, i.e. at least a 2-point reduction on the 11-point Numeric Rating Score (NRS) for dry mouth severity. The NRS ranges from 0=no dry mouth to 10=worst possible dry mouth.
Time frame: Baseline to week 2, 4, 8 and 12
Change in mean NRS dry mouth scores in the MEP group at all time-points when compared to the control group. The NRS ranges from 0=no dry mouth to 10=worst possible dry mouth.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 8 and 12
A responder is defined as a participant with a clinically relevant response, i.e. at least a 2-point reduction on the 11-point Numeric Rating Score (NRS) for dry mouth severity. The NRS ranges from 0=no dry mouth to 10=worst possible dry mouth.
Time frame: Baseline to week 2, 4, 8 and 12
Dry mouth symptoms are measured by the summated Xerostomia Inventory-Dutch Version (sXI-D). The sXI-D contains 5 items adressing dry mouth in general, dry mouth during eating, difficulty eating, difficulty swallowing and dry lips. Here, three items have been added: oral pain, difficulty speaking and change in taste. The sXI-D scale ranges from 0=never, 1=occassionally to 2=often.
Time frame: Week 4 to Week 8 and 12
The OHRQoL is measured using the validated Dutch version of the Geriatric Oral Health Assessment Index (GOHAI-NL). The GOHAI-NL contains 12 items in three categories: phsyical function, psychosocial function and pain/discomfort, and uses a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0=never to 5=often/always.
Time frame: Baseline to week 2, 4, 8 and 12
Clinical functioning is examined by a patient-reported functional status (PRFS) scale. The PRFS was originally part of the validated Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA) but has also been validated as a stand-alone measure. Activities and function are measured on a five-point scale, with the following definitions: 0= normal with no limitations, 1=not my normal self, but able to be up and about with fairly normal activities, 2=not feeling up to most things, but in bed or chair less than half of the day, 3=able to do little activity and spend most of the day in bed or chair, 4=bed ridden, rarely out of bed.
Time frame: Baseline to week 2, 4, 8 and 12
GPE by participants is determined using a 7-point GPE scale. The GPE addresses perceived improvement of their condition, ranging from 1=very good, 2=good, 3=fairly good, 4=same as before, 5=fairly bad, 6=bad, 7=very bad.
Time frame: Baseline to week 2, 4, 8 and 12
The HRQoL is assessed using the EuroQoL five-demensional five-level questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L). The EQ-4D-4L contains five dimensions of health: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 answer categories (levels): 0=no problems, 1=some problems, 2=moderate problems, 3=severe problems, and 4=extreme problems/unable to.
Time frame: At baseline and upon full study completion per study site (expected after an average of 1 year)
Current clinical practices for dry mouth care as reported by health care professionals are examined by a self-developed questionnaire, including questions (open-ended and multiple choice) on work experience and education and on all aspects of clinical practice for dry mouth care (such as initial identification of dry mouth symptoms, medical anamnesis, physical examination, interventions/treatment and monitoring, and use of guidelines). The questionnaire will be administered to all participating nurses in the intervention and control group, and supplemented by at least one medical doctor per study site.
Time frame: Week 12
Participants' experiences in the control group (receiving care as usual) with dry mouth care are examined by individual semi-structured interviews.
Time frame: Upon study completion, after an average of 1 year
Barriers and facilitators as perceived by nurses leading the MEP consultations are identified through a questionnaire, adapted from the validated Dutch Implementation of an Innovation questionnaire. This questionnaire includes personal, logistic, financial, educational and work environment barriers and facilitators.
Time frame: Upon study completion, after an average of 1 year
The barriers, facilitators and overall applicability of the MEP as perceived by the nurses leading the MEP consultations is further explored in focus groups.
Time frame: Upon study completion, after an average of 1 year
Experiences with the MEP and received care, including barriers and facilitators, by participants in the intervention group are examined by individual semi-structured interviews.
Time frame: Upon study completion, after an average of 1 year
Barriers and facilitators of the current guidelines are examined in focus groups with nurses from either arm.
Time frame: Week 0, 4, 8 and 12.
The CEA is based upon patient-reported medical costs as measured by the Institute for Medical Technology Assessment (iMTA) Medical Consumption Questionnaire (iMCQ). It encompasses use of medical and paramedical treatments or services, in- and outpatient care and use of medication. Here, the questionnaire consists of three main questions asking for the frequency of contact with dental services, the frequency of contact with health care professionals across different disciplines and the purchase of dry mouth treatment products (e.g. medication and other aids) in the last four weeks.
Leiden University Medical Center
Other
Dry Mouth in Patients With a Life-limiting Condition or Frailty: the Effect of a Nurse-led Patient Education Program
Acronym: MEP
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04986501
Dry Mouth, Mouth Diseases
Colorado Springs, Colorado, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06708195
Dry Mouth, Mouth Diseases
Murcia, Spain
View Trial DetailsNCT05640362
Dry Mouth, Mouth Diseases
Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
View Trial DetailsNCT03281486
Dry Mouth, Mouth Diseases
St Louis, Missouri, United States
View Trial Details