University of Florida
Gainesville, Florida, 32610, United States
Location status: Recruiting
Location contact
Aprinda I Queen, PhD
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Aprinda Indahlastari, PhD
CONTACT
CONTACT
NCT Number: NCT05998031
The current study is a mechanistic study to evaluate working memory gains from application of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in older adults with mild cognitive impairments (MCI) compared to cognitively healthy control
Interested in participating?
Request Info60 year–95 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Gainesville, Florida, 32610, United States
Location status: Recruiting
Aprinda I Queen, PhD
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Aprinda Indahlastari, PhD
CONTACT
CONTACT
The current study is a mechanistic study to evaluate working memory gains with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in older adults with mild cognitive impairments (MCI) compared to cognitively healthy control. This study is funded by a mentored career award (The University of Florida, Clinical and Translational Science Institute [CTSI] Pilot Award) and thus the mentors (Drs. Cohen, DeKosky, Woods, Fang) are listed as additional Principal Investigators in this study. The proposed study investigates the effects of acute (one-time) tDCS application on working memory gains (i.e., behavior and functional) by evaluating brain structure and cognitive function relationships. tDCS is a method of non-invasive brain stimulation that directly stimulates brain regions involved in active cognitive function and enhances neural plasticity when paired with a training task. A mechanistic, in-scanner, crossover design tDCS study (active and sham stimulation) with 2milliamps (mA) fixed dosing application will enroll 110 participants comprising 55 cognitively normal/healthy older adults and 55 older adults with MCI. The study will employ multi-modal neuroimaging (structural and functional data), person-specific computational models, and machine learning to elucidate acute tDCS effects on working memory. Change in cognitive function (i.e., working memory performance) will be quantified using working memory tasks and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The investigators will compare changes in working memory performance resulting from active tDCS versus sham tDCS during 2-back task compared to 0-back task.
The investigators will test the following hypotheses:
To date, no studies have examined acute tDCS application in MCI cohort and directly comparing results to cognitively healthy cohort. The present study will provide insight into mechanisms underlying tDCS application in MCI population for combating cognitive decline in a rapidly aging population in the United States. Information gathered from this study may guide future intervention strategies to combat cognitive decline and improve the quality of life of aging population.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
A neuroConn MR-safe 1x1 tDCS stimulator will be used to apply 12 minutes of 2.0 mA electrical current, with 30 seconds ramps up and 30 seconds ramps down. The electrical current will be applied by using two carbon rubber electrodes (one anode, one cathode) with added ten20 conductive paste. The electrode+paste will be affixed on the participant's scalp over the frontal cortices at F3 and F4 location (EEG 10-20 system). Inflow of current (anode) will occur at F4 location, and outflow of current will occur at F3 (cathode).
Sham stimulation will be performed with the same 1x1 device. Participants will receive 2 mA of direct current stimulation for 30 seconds with 30 seconds ramps up and down. This provides the tingling and prickling sensation on the scalp associated with tDCS while prevent delivering sufficient current (12 minutes) to penetrate the skull and stimulate the brain. Prep in sham conditions will be identical to active stimulation conditions. For each stimulation condition (active, sham), each participant will perform three runs of N-back working memory task (baseline/pre-stimulation, during stimulation, and after/post-stimulation) as detailed below. Sham efficacy will be evaluated as a direct comparison in N-back performance and connectivity results in active group versus sham group.
Time frame: 12 minutes versus 24 minutes, 12 minutes versus 36 minutes. Then at each time point comparing active versus sham stimulation, separated by at least two weeks.
N-back accuracy as working memory performance will be analyzed as a percent accuracy score on the 2-back and 0-back task.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
University of Florida
Other
Acronym: AIM
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07547319
Cognition Disorders, Cognitive Decline
San Francisco, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04635657
Central Nervous System Neoplasms, Cognition Disorders
Columbus, Ohio, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06727773
Behavior, Breast Cancer
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05877196
Alzheimer Disease, Brain Diseases
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
View Trial Details