Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT05795023

A Longitudinal Evaluation of Oculometric Measures and Clinical Assessment Over Time in PD Patients

This is a prospective study in a cohort of about 30 patients with Idiopathic Parkinson's disease, who will be evaluated with a clinical assessment and an oculometric examination during a time period with specific intervals.

This study aims to evaluate the correlation between oculometric measures and clinical assessment over time.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–85 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Movement Disorders Unit, Sourasky Tel Aviv Medical Center

Tel Aviv, 6423906, Israel

About this study

This is an observational prospective cohort study, in a cohort of up to 30 patients with idiopathic PD. The aim of this study is to demonstrate that oculometric measures are able to detect patient deterioration faster than can be detected using the currently available clinical assessment tools. In addition, to evaluate the correlation between oculometric measures and Movement Disorder Society-Sponsored Revision of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) score over time ,in subjects who meet the inclusion and exclusion criteria, and who provide a signed Informed Consent. All patients will be assessed using MDS-UPDRS over a period of 9 months (4 assessments, at 0, 3, 6, 9 months). During this time period, every subject who consents will undergo a NeuraLight session including oculometric measurements and eye-tracking recordings using a novel software-based platform and an eye- tracking system (Tobii, CE-marked class B approved device) (approx. 30 minutes). The oculometric evaluation will occur during the first 3 months for every patient every 2 weeks (+3 days), and then after 6 months and 9 months from enrollment (+3 days), (9 tests in total). All assessments will be performed during a clinic visit unless authorized to be conducted remotely. During the study, the sponsor will be blinded to the private details of the subjects.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Men and women with idiopathic PD (Hoehn & Yahr scale 1-3)
  • Age between 18 and 85 years old
  • Normal or corrected vision
  • Ability to follow instructions
  • Willing and able to sign an informed consent form

Exclusion criteria

  • Inability to sit for 30 minutes on a chair in a calm manner
  • Personal or 1st degree relative history of epilepsy
  • Additional neurological diseases
  • Drug or alcohol abuse (except for using medical cannabis during 24 hours prior NL examination date)
  • Pregnancy or a potential pregnancy (self-declaration)

Treatment and study plan

NeuraLight

Other

NeuraLight software-based platform

Primary outcomes

  1. Change of saccadic latency over time as evaluated during visits

    Time frame: 12 months

    Difference between saccadic latency (ms) as quantified during each visit by the NeuraLight test measured using a statistical comparison of values (e.g. t-test, ANOVA), p>0.05) over time during study period

  2. Change of anti-saccadic error rates over time as evaluated during visits

    Time frame: 12 months

    Difference between anti-saccadic error rates (%) as quantified during each visit by the NeuraLight test measured using a statistical comparison of values (e.g. t-test, ANOVA), p>0.05) over time during study period

  3. Change of smooth pursuit speed over time as evaluated during visits

    Time frame: 12 months

    Difference between smooth pursuit speed (ms)as quantified during each visit by the NeuraLight test measured using a statistical comparison of values (e.g. t-test, ANOVA), p>0.05) over time during study period

  4. Correlation between MDS-UPDRS score and its parts with saccadic latency

    Time frame: 12 months

    The correlation between MDS-UPDRS score and its parts with saccadic latency (ms) measured using R-Square (high correlation>0.5, moderate correlation 0.2-0.5, low correlation<0.2), p<0.05) according to the Movement Disorder Society-Sponsored Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) at visits

  5. Correlation between MDS-UPDRS score and its parts with anti-saccadic error rates

    Time frame: 12 months

    The correlation between MDS-UPDRS score and its parts with anti-saccadic error rates (%), measured using R-Square (high correlation>0.5, moderate correlation 0.2-0.5, low correlation<0.2), p<0.05) according to the Movement Disorder Society-Sponsored Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) at visits

  6. Correlation between MDS-UPDRS score and its parts with smooth pursuit

    Time frame: 12 months

    The correlation between MDS-UPDRS score and its parts with smooth pursuit speed (ms) measured using R-Square (high correlation>0.5, moderate correlation 0.2-0.5, low correlation<0.2), p<0.05) according to the Movement Disorder Society-Sponsored Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) at visits

Secondary outcomes

  1. Using the retrieved data of collected NeuraLight oculometric measures for calibration of prediction models of MDS-UPDRS clinical endpoint

    Time frame: 12 months

    Optimization of a feature selection model (Fisher's Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA)) on NeuraLight oculometric measures used for a logistic regression model of MDS-UPDRS with a relative root mean square error (RMSE) of <0.1

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

NeuraLight

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

A Longitudinal Study to Evaluate the Correlation Between Oculometric Measures and MDS-UPDRS Over Time in a Cohort of Patients With Idiopathic Parkinson's Disease (PD)

Important dates

Study start
2023
Primary completion
2024
Study completion
2024
First posted
Apr 3, 2023
Registry last updated
Oct 29, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.