Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network
Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2C4, Canada
NCT Number: NCT07548788
Background: In Canada, lung cancer accounts for approximately 25% of cancer deaths each year. There are also known sociodemographic and racial inequities in the diagnosis and treatment of lung cancer. Studies have consistently found that patients with cancer have a high number of unmet needs, including psychological, physical, and informational. Navigation programs represent a potentially promising, equitable, and cost-effective approach to address the unmet needs of patients with lung cancer, but there is limited evidence about their effectiveness in patients with lung cancer. The investigators developed and have implemented a volunteer lay navigator program, Care and Connect (C&C), which aims to proactively reduce distress in patients, provide information and support, and increase access to treatment and supportive care resources. The proposed pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) project plans to 1) assess the feasibility and acceptability of referral to C&C and, 2) examine the preliminary effectiveness of C&C.
Methods: The current study is a 2-arm, parallel group, mixed methods, pilot RCT with a 1:1 allocation ratio and 3 timepoints: baseline (T0), 3 months (T1), 6 months (T2). It is designed to test the trial feasibility and acceptability of the C&C intervention in patients with lung cancer. In total, 50 participants will be randomized to receive the C&C intervention or usual care only (25 per arm). At each timepoint, data will be collected on participants' access to psychosocial (PSO) services, psychological wellbeing, and satisfaction with care through participant medical record and a survey. To gain additional insights regarding the acceptability, feasibility, and impact of C&C, a subset of 15 participants from the intervention group will be contacted for qualitative exit interviews.
Expected outcomes: There is limited evidence about the effects of lay navigation programs on access to PSO services among patients with lung cancer. This work addresses this knowledge gap by evaluating the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary impact of C&C on patients with lung cancer. The findings of the proposed work will expand the body of evidence supporting lay navigation to the lung cancer population, contributing to the evidence base for patient-centred care.
Trial opening soon.
Get Notified18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2C4, Canada
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
6-month lay navigation program. Lay navigators provide basic psychosocial and informational support and health system navigation through phone call or video conference. Sessions held with patients are variable based on patients' needs.
Time frame: From study start date to the end of treatment at 6 months
≥50% recruitment rate (#patients consented/ #patients eligible and approached)
Time frame: From study start date to the end of treatment at 6 months
≥80% baseline questionnaire completion rate (#patients who complete baseline questionnaire/ #patients consented)
Time frame: From study start date to the end of treatment at 6 months
≥65% questionnaire completion rate at follow-up (i.e., 3- and 6-months) (#patients who complete each follow-up questionnaire/ #patients matched with a navigator or #patients who complete each follow-up questionnaire/ #patients randomized to the control group)
Time frame: From study start date to the end of treatment at 6 months
≥65% of patients completing at least 1 session with a lay navigator
Time frame: This measure will be administered at 3 months and 6 months
Intervention acceptability will be assessed using the Patient Satisfaction with Navigator-Interpersonal Relationship scale (PSN-I), a 9-item self-report measure of patients' satisfaction with the relationship with their navigator. Higher PSN-I scores indicate greater patient satisfaction. Acceptability is defined as ≥70% of participants scoring ≥30 on the PSN-I.
Time frame: From study start date to the end of treatment at 6 months
This outcome is operationalized as the proportion of patients and patient's number of sessions of specialized Psychosocial Oncology (PSO) services within the hospital setting during the study period. Data regarding PSO services use will be collected from participants' medical record.
Time frame: From study start date to the end of treatment at 6 months
This outcome is operationalized as the proportion of patients and patient's number of sessions of specialized palliative care within the hospital setting during the study period. Data regarding palliative care use will be collected from participants' medical record.
Time frame: This measure will be administered at baseline, 3 months and 6 months
Depressive symptoms will be assessed using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9). The PHQ-9 is a 9-item measure of depression. A four-point Likert scale scores from 0 (not at all) to 3 (nearly every day), with a total score ranging from 0 to 27. Higher scores are related to higher depression severity.
Time frame: This measure will be administered at baseline, 3 months and 6 months
Generalized anxiety will be assessed using the Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale (GAD-7). The GAD-7 is a 7-item self-report measure designed to screen the severity of GAD symptoms. Items are scored on a four-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 3 (nearly every day) with a total score ranging from 0 to 21. Scores from 0-4 indicate minimal anxiety, 5-9 indicate mild anxiety, 10-14 indicate moderate anxiety, and 15-21 indicate severe anxiety.
Time frame: This measure will be administered at baseline, 3 months and 6 months
Distress about death and dying will be assessed using the Death and Dying Distress Scale (DADDS). The DADDS is a 15-item self-report measure assessing specific concerns of advanced cancer patients about end of life, feeling a burden to others and wasted opportunities. It is scored on a six-point Likert scale from 0 (no distress) to 5 (very much distress), with a total score ranging from 0 to 75, a greater score indicating higher death anxiety and distress.
Time frame: This measure will be administered at baseline, 3 months and 6 months
Patient satisfaction with cancer care will be measured with the Patient Satisfaction with Cancer-Related Care Measure (PSCC). The PSCC is an 18-item questionnaire that addresses multiple domains, including: access/logistics, interpersonal skills of the provider, information gathering and reporting, and coordination of care. PSCC items are rated on 5-point Likert scales: "1 = Strongly Agree", "2 = Agree", "3 = Neutral", "4 = Disagree", and "5 = Strongly Disagree". A lower PSCC total score indicates higher satisfaction level. The PSCC questionnaire has a score range between a minimum of 18 (best score) and a maximum of 90 (worst score).
Time frame: This measure will be administered at baseline, 3 months and 6 months
Patient satisfaction with cancer care will be measured with the Clinical Evaluation Questionnaire-Information Navigation and Support (CEQ-INS). CEQ-INS is a 19-item self-reported instrument with questions used 4-point Likert scale (1 'Not at All' to 4 'Very Much'). Higher scores correlate with higher patient satisfaction with the information and support provided from their care team.
Time frame: This measure will be administered at baseline, 3 months and 6 months
HRQoL will be assessed with the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General (FACT-G). The FACT-G is a 27-item questionnaire that covers four HR-QOL sub-domains: physical, social, emotional, and functional well-being. Each of the questions will be scored on a scale from 0 (Not at all) to 4 (Very much) using a manual scoring template in which some items are reverse scored. The minimally important difference (MID) is 5 points for the FACT-G questionnaire. In other words, five points is the most minimal difference between the control group and treatment group scores that would indicate a clinically meaningful change. A positive change in points indicates better QOL.
Time frame: This measure will be administered at baseline, 3 months and 6 months
Perceived social support will be measured using the ENRICHD Social Support Instrument (ESSI). ESSI is a 7-item scale used to measure perceived social support. The first six items have a rating scale of 1 (none of the time) to 5 (all of the time) and the seventh is scored 4 for 'yes' and 2 for 'no'. Total scores range from 8 to 34. A lower total score reflects less support.
Time frame: This measure will be administered at baseline, 3 months and 6 months
Patient activation will be measured using the Patient Activation Measure-13 items (PAM-13). The PAM-13 measures patient activation through self-reports of knowledge, skills, and confidence related to self-management of one's own health care. This 13-item self-report assesses confidence in self-management and understanding of health condition. Each of the 13 items scored on a 5-point Likert scale. The primary outcome is an activation score derived from the 13 items (possible range of 0-100, higher scores indicating higher patient activation in self-management).
Time frame: From study start date to the end of treatment at 6 months
This includes the number, duration, and date of psychosocial appointments that are received outside of the hospital setting during the study period. This will be self-reported by participants.
Time frame: This measure will be administered at baseline, 3 months and 6 months
Healthcare utilization will be measured using the Health Care Utilization Questionnaire. The Health Care Utilization Questionnaire is a 12 item self-report instrument designed to capture participants' use of healthcare services during the study period. Responses are recorded as counts of service use and will be used to estimate overall healthcare utilization during the study period, with higher values indicating greater use of healthcare services.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Gilla K Shapiro, PhD
CONTACT
416-946-4501 ext.4211
Research Coordinator
CONTACT
University Health Network, Toronto
Other
Feasibility and Acceptability of the Care and Connect Program for Patients With Lung Cancer
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07405190
Bronchial Neoplasms, Carcinoma, Bronchogenic
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07637448
Bronchial Neoplasms, Carcinoma, Bronchogenic
Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
View Trial DetailsNCT06810609
Bronchial Neoplasms, Carcinoma, Bronchogenic
Freiburg im Breisgau, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany
View Trial DetailsNCT06747026
Bronchial Neoplasms, Carcinoma, Bronchogenic
Hong Kong, HongKong
View Trial Details