Romidepsin
DrugIntravenous dosing for 4 hours on Days 1, 8, and 15 of each 28-day cycle
NCT Number: NCT01456039
The purpose of the study was to assess efficacy, tolerability, safety and pharmacokinetics of Romidepsin in subjects with progressive or relapsed peripheral T-cell lymphoma
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me20 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 1 / Phase 2
Nagoya City University Hospital, Nagoya, Aichi-ken, Japan
This is a Phase 1/2, non-randomized, open-label, single-arm trial with two phases. The first phase is a 3 + 3 dose escalation phase to determine a recommended dose for treating patients with Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma (PTCL) or Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma (CTCL) based on the assessment of Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs).The second phase will assess efficacy at the recommended dose by measuring objective response [Complete Response (CR), Unconfirmed Complete Response (CR(u)) or Partial Response (PR)] and determining best overall response of each patient. Phase 1 will enroll a maximum of 12 patients and Phase 2 will enroll up to approximately 40 patients
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Patients must fulfill all of the following criteria to be eligible for study participation and have:
Exclusion criteria
Confirmation should be made before enrollment, and the subjects corresponding to the criteria should not be enrolled.
Intravenous dosing for 4 hours on Days 1, 8, and 15 of each 28-day cycle
Time frame: Up to Day 28; Cycle 1
DLT was defined as an adverse event (AE) occurring in Cycle 1 in Phase 1 and judged that the causal relationship to the investigational product could not be denied. The severity of all AEs was graded based upon the NCI CTCAE version 3.0. DLTs were defined as: • Grade 4 Hemoglobin <6.5 g/dL • Grade 4 Neutrophil <500/μL continuing for at least 5 days • Febrile neutropenia (Grade 4 neutropenia caused by fever and ≥ 38.5° C for more than 1 hour) • Grade 4 thrombocyte (< 25,000/μL), or thrombocytopenia with hemorrhage requiring platelet transfusion • Nausea, vomiting, or diarrhea at > grade 3 in spite of treatment • Grade 3 ALT (alanine aminotransferase) or AST (aspartate aminotransferase) values continued for 7 days. • Grade 4 ALT or AST • Grade 2 arrhythmia • Grade 4 non-hematological AEs • Other grade 3 non-hematological AEs except transient fatigue, anorexia, hyponatremia, and tumor lysis syndrome • Other AEs leading to discontinuation of administration
Time frame: Tumor assessments performed every 2 months; median follow-up time was 100 days; up to the data cut-off of 28 July 2015
Objective disease response in PTCL was defined as patients with a complete response (CR), unconfirmed complete response (CRu) or a partial response (PR) according to modified IWC 1999 criteria and assessed by an independent efficacy reviewer. A CR is >75% decrease in size of maximum 6 largest target within nodal and extranodal lesions, complete disappearance of other nodal and extranodal; total disappearance of clinical disease; disease-related signs and symptoms, normalization of biochemical abnormalities, disappearance of spleen, liver, or kidney enlargement; no bone marrow (BM) involvement, no new sites of disease. CRu: all above criteria fulfilled except for BM involvement is indeterminate. PR: a ≥50% decrease in size of 6 largest target lesions and no increase other nodal and extranodal; no progression of clinical disease; disease-related signs and symptoms, normalization or biochemical abnormalities, no progression in size of liver, spleen, or kidney; and no new sites of disease
Time frame: Day 1 of study drug through 30 days after the last dose of study drug or discontinuation date; Up to data cut-off of 28 July 2015; maximum follow up time was 184.3 weeks
An adverse event (AE) is any noxious, unintended, or untoward medical occurrence that may appear or worsen during the course of a study. An AE that resulted in any of the outcomes was defined as a serious (SAE): • Death • Life-threatening event • An inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization • Persistent or significant disability or incapacity; • Congenital anomaly or birth defect • Other important medical event The investigator judged the relationship of an AE to study drug based on the timing of the AE relative to drug administration and whether or not other drugs, therapeutic interventions, or underlying conditions could provide an explanation for the event. The severity of an AE was evaluated by the investigator according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE Version 3.0), Japanese Clinical Oncology Group (JCOG) where Grade 1 = Mild, Grade 2 = Moderate, Grade 3 = Severe, Grade 4 = Life-threatening and Grade 5 = Death.
Time frame: Day 1 at Cycle 1; collected at 0 (pre-dose), 1, 2, 3, and 4 (at the end of administration) hours after the start of administration, 0.25 (15 minutes), 0.5 (30 minutes), 1, 2, 4, 6, 20, and 44 hours after the end of administration
Area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to the last quantifiable time point, calculated by the linear trapezoidal rule when concentrations are increasing and the logarithmic trapezoidal method when concentrations are decreasing.
Time frame: Day 1 at Cycle 1; collected at 0 (pre-dose), 1, 2, 3, and 4 (at the end of administration) hours after the start of administration, 0.25 (15 minutes), 0.5 (30 minutes), 1, 2, 4, 6, 20, and 44 hours after the end of administration
Area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero extrapolated to infinity (AUC∞) of romidepsin on Day 1; if possible the area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity, calculated by the linear trapezoidal rule and extrapolated to infinity was calculated according to the following equation: AUC∞ = AUCt + (Ct/ λz ), where Ct is the last quantifiable concentration.
Time frame: Day 1 at Cycle 1; collected at 0 (pre-dose), 1, 2, 3, and 4 (at the end of administration) hours after the start of administration, 0.25 (15 minutes), 0.5 (30 minutes), 1, 2, 4, 6, 20, and 44 hours after the end of administration
The maximum observed plasma concentration of romidepsin (Cmax) obtained directly from the observed concentration versus time data
Time frame: Day 1 at Cycle 1; collected at 0 (pre-dose), 1, 2, 3, and 4 (at the end of administration) hours after the start of administration, 0.25 (15 minutes), 0.5 (30 minutes), 1, 2, 4, 6, 20, and 44 hours after the end of administration
The time to first maximum observed plasma concentration of romidepsin after a single dose on Day 1.
Time frame: Day 1 at Cycle 1; collected at 0 (pre-dose), 1, 2, 3, and 4 (at the end of administration) hours after the start of administration, 0.25 (15 minutes), 0.5 (30 minutes), 1, 2, 4, 6, 20, and 44 hours after the end of administration.
The terminal phase half-life of romidepsin after a single dose on Day 1, calculated according to the following equation: t½ = 0.693/λz, where λz is the terminal phase rate constant.
Time frame: Day 1 at Cycle 1; collected at 0 (pre-dose), 1, 2, 3, and 4 (at the end of administration) hours after the start of administration, 0.25 (15 minutes), 0.5 (30 minutes), 1, 2, 4, 6, 20, and 44 hours after the end of administration.
The apparent total clearance of romidepsin after a single dose on Day 1, calculated as dose/AUC0-infinity.
Time frame: Day 1 at Cycle 1; collected at 0 (pre-dose), 1, 2, 3, and 4 (at the end of administration) hours after the start of administration, 0.25 (15 minutes), 0.5 (30 minutes), 1, 2, 4, 6, 20, and 44 hours after the end of administration
Apparent volume of distribution, was calculated according to the equation: Vd/F = (CL/F)/λz
Time frame: Day 15 at Cycle 1; collected at 0 (pre-dose), 1, 2, 3, and 4 (at the end of administration) hours after the start of administration, 0.25 (15 minutes), 0.5 (30 minutes), 1, 2, 4, 6, 20, and 44 hours after the end of administration
Area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to the last quantifiable time point at steady state, calculated by the linear trapezoidal rule when concentrations are increasing and the logarithmic trapezoidal method when concentrations are decreasing
Time frame: Day 15 at Cycle 1; collected at 0 (pre-dose), 1, 2, 3, and 4 (at the end of administration) hours after the start of administration, 0.25 (15 minutes), 0.5 (30 minutes), 1, 2, 4, 6, 20, and 44 hours after the end of administration
Maximum observed concentration in plasma at steady state
Time frame: Day 15 at Cycle 1; collected at 0 (pre-dose), 1, 2, 3, and 4 (at the end of administration) hours after the start of administration, 0.25 (15 minutes), 0.5 (30 minutes), 1, 2, 4, 6, 20, and 44 hours after the end of administration
Observed time to first maximum plasma concentration at steady state
Time frame: Day 15 at Cycle 1; collected at 0 (pre-dose), 1, 2, 3, and 4 (at the end of administration) hours after the start of administration, 0.25 (15 minutes), 0.5 (30 minutes), 1, 2, 4, 6, 20, and 44 hours after the end of administration.
The terminal phase half-life of romidepsin after a single dose on Day 15, calculated according to the following equation: t½ = 0.693/λz, where λz is the terminal phase rate constant.
Time frame: Day 1 and Day 15 in Cycle 1; collected at 0 (pre-dose), 1, 2, 3, and 4 (at the end of administration) hours after the start of administration, 0.25 (15 minutes), 0.5 (30 minutes), 1, 2, 4, 6, 20, and 44 hours after the end of administration
Area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to the last quantifiable time point; accumulation ratio calculated as AUC (0-t),ss/AUC (0-t)
Time frame: Day 1 and Day 15 in Cycle 1; collected at 0 (pre-dose), 1, 2, 3, and 4 (at end of administration) hours after the start of administration, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 20, and 44 hours after the end of administration. Day 8, Cycle 1, samples collected at 0 hour
Cmax of Romidepsin: accumulation ratio based on Cmax calculated as Cmax,ss/Cmax
Time frame: Median follow-up: 100 days; up to data cut-off of 28 July 2015
The time from the start of the Q-wave to the end of the T-wave QTc intervals greater than 450 msec post-baseline performed by centralized reviewer. The Bazett's (QTcB) and Fridericia (QTcF) correction were used as the standard clinical correction for calculating the heart rate-corrected QTc interval
Time frame: Tumor assessments performed every 2 months; median follow-up time was 100 days; up to the data cut-off of 28 July 2015
Objective disease response in PTCL was defined as achieving a CR or PR based on the Modified 2007 IWC. A CR = a complete disappearance of all disease; lymph node mass regression to normal size on computerized tomography (CT) scan or negative on positron emission tomography (PET); non-palpable splenic and disappearance of liver nodules; infiltrate cleared on repeat bone marrow (BM), immunohistochemistry negative. PR = a reduction of measurable lesions; ≥ 50% decrease in sum of the products of the greatest diameters (SPD) of up to 6 largest dominant masses, no enlargement in size of other nodes; ≥ 50% decrease in SPD and no increase in liver or spleen.
Time frame: Median follow-up time was 100 days; up to the data cut-off of 28 July 2015
TTR for PTCL was defined as the time in days from first dose date to the first date of objective disease response.
Time frame: Median follow-up time was 100 days; up to the data cut-off of 28 July 2015
TTR for PTCL was defined as the time in days from first dose date to the first date of objective disease response.
Time frame: Median follow-up time was 100 days; up to the data cut-off of 28 July 2015
DOR was defined as the number of days from the date of the first disease response (Complete, Unconfirmed Complete or Partial Response) until the date of progression, analyzed using Kaplan-Meier methods.
Time frame: Median follow-up time was 100 days; up to the data cut-off of 28 July 2015
DOR was defined as the number of days from the date of the first disease response (Complete, Unconfirmed Complete or Partial Response) until the date of progression, analyzed using Kaplan-Meier methods.
Time frame: Median follow-up time was 100 days; up to the data cut-off of 28 July 2015
Time to progression (≥50% increase from the nadir in the individual sum of the products of the diameters of any index lesion; the reappearance of pathology, enlargement of liver/spleen, or unequivocal progression of non-measurable disease or appearance of any new lesions) was defined as the duration from the date of the first study drug dose to the date of relapse or progression
Time frame: Median follow-up time was 100 days; up to the data cut-off of 28 July 2015
Time to progression (≥50% increase from the nadir in the individual sum of the products of the diameters of any index lesion; the reappearance of pathology, enlargement of liver/spleen, or unequivocal progression of non-measurable disease or appearance of any new lesions) was defined as the duration from the date of the first study drug dose to the date of relapse or progression
Celgene
Industry
A Japanese Phase 1/2, Multicenter, Open-label Study to Assess the Efficacy, Tolerability, Safety and Pharmacokinetics of Romidepsin in Subjects With the Progressive or Relapsed Peripheral T-cell Lymphoma
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05137847
Chemically-Induced Disorders, Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions
Nagoya, Japan
View Trial DetailsNCT03742921
Disease Attributes, Hemic and Lymphatic Diseases
Osaka, Japan
View Trial DetailsNCT03049449
Enteropathy-Associated T-Cell Lymphoma, Hemic and Lymphatic Diseases
Bethesda, Maryland, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03302728
Disease Attributes, Hemic and Lymphatic Diseases
Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
View Trial Details