Evofosfamide
DrugEvofosfamide infusion intravenously at an escalated dose of 240, 340 or 480 milligram per square meter (mg/m^2) on Day 1, 8 and 15 of each 28-day treatment cycle until progressive disease, unacceptable toxicity or withdrawal.
NCT Number: NCT01833546
This is a Japanese Phase 1, open-label, and dose-escalating trial of TH-302 as monotherapy in subjects with solid tumors and in combination with gemcitabine in subjects with pancreatic cancer.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me20 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 1
Research Site, Kashiwa, Japan
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Evofosfamide infusion intravenously at an escalated dose of 240, 340 or 480 milligram per square meter (mg/m^2) on Day 1, 8 and 15 of each 28-day treatment cycle until progressive disease, unacceptable toxicity or withdrawal.
Gemcitabine 1000 mg/m^2 on Day 1, 8 and 15 of each 28-day treatment cycle until progressive disease, unacceptable toxicity or withdrawal.
Time frame: Day 1 up to Day 28 of Cycle 1
A DLT was defined as any of the following toxicities at any dose level that occurred during the first cycle, and were considered to be related to the study drug by the Investigator or the Sponsor: - Grade 3 or Grade 4 non-hematological toxicity, except for Grade 3 or Grade 4 nausea, vomiting and diarrhea, - Grade 3 or higher skin reactions or mucosal toxicities, - Febrile neutropenia, - Grade 3 alanine aminotransferase (ALT)/aspartate aminotransferase (AST) elevation lasting more than 7 days, - Grade 4 neutropenia lasting more than 5 days, - Grade 4 thrombocytopenia, - Grade 4 anemia, - Any non-preexisting Grade 2 or higher non-hematologic toxicity which, in the judgment of the Investigator and the Sponsor, was considered a DLT, - Any Grade 2 or higher non-hematologic toxicity that did not resolve to Grade 0 or Grade 1 toxicity by the start of the next cycle which, in the judgment of the Investigator and the Sponsor, was considered a DLT.
Time frame: Baseline up to 33 months
AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this the study drug. An AE was defined as any unfavourable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of study drug, whether or not considered related to the study drug. A serious AE was an AE that resulted in any of the following outcomes: death; life threatening; persistent/significant disability/incapacity; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; congenital anomaly/birth defect or was otherwise considered medically important. TEAEs are events with start date on or after the date of first dose of study treatment and up to and including 30 days after the last dose of study treatment, or events with start date prior to the date of first dose of study treatment, and worsened in severity or become serious during treatment. TEAEs include both Serious TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs.
Time frame: Monotherapy: pre-dose, 0.25, 0.5, 0.58, 0.75, 1, 1.08, 1.25, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3.5, 4.5, 6.5, 8.5, 12.5 hours post-dose on Day 1 and 15; Combination therapy: pre-dose, 0.5, 0.66, 1, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 4.5, 6.5, 8, 10.5, 26.5 hours post-dose on Day 1 and 15
Time frame: Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, and 24 hours post-dose on Day 1 and 15
Tmax was the time to peak concentration in plasma, obtained directly from the concentration versus time curve. This outcome was applicable for only combination arm in which evofosfamide was administered along with gemcitabine.
Time frame: Monotherapy: pre-dose, 0.25, 0.5, 0.58, 0.75, 1, 1.08, 1.25, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3.5, 4.5, 6.5, 8.5, 12.5 hours post-dose on Day 1 and 15; Combination therapy: pre-dose, 0.5, 0.66, 1, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 4.5, 6.5, 8, 10.5, 26.5 hours post-dose on Day 1 and 15
Maximum observed plasma concentration was assessed.
Time frame: Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, and 24 hours post-dose on Day 1 and 15
Maximum observed Plasma concentration was assessed. This outcome was applicable for only combination arm in which evofosfamide was administered along with gemcitabine.
Time frame: Monotherapy: pre-dose, 0.25, 0.5, 0.58, 0.75, 1, 1.08, 1.25, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3.5, 4.5, 6.5, 8.5, 12.5 hours post-dose on Day 1 and 15; Combination therapy: pre-dose, 0.5, 0.66, 1, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 4.5, 6.5, 8, 10.5, 26.5 hours post-dose on Day 1 and 15
Terminal rate constant was determined from the terminal slope of the log-transformed plasma concentration curve using linear regression on terminal data points of the curve.
Time frame: Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, and 24 hours post-dose on Day 1 and 15
Terminal rate constant was determined from the terminal slope of the log-transformed plasma concentration curve using linear regression on terminal data points of the curve. This outcome was applicable for only combination arm in which evofosfamide was administered along with gemcitabine.
Time frame: Monotherapy: pre-dose, 0.25, 0.5, 0.58, 0.75, 1, 1.08, 1.25, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3.5, 4.5, 6.5, 8.5, 12.5 hours post-dose on Day 1 and 15; Combination therapy: pre-dose, 0.5, 0.66, 1, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 4.5, 6.5, 8, 10.5, 26.5 hours post-dose on Day 1 and 15
Terminal half-life was calculated as ln(2)/λz. Where λz is a Terminal rate constant, which was determined from the terminal slope of the log-transformed plasma concentration curve using linear regression on terminal data points of the curve.
Time frame: Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, and 24 hours post-dose on Day 1 and 15
Terminal half-life was calculated as ln(2)/λz. Where λz is a Terminal rate constant, which was determined from the terminal slope of the log-transformed plasma concentration curve using linear regression on terminal data points of the curve. This outcome was applicable for only combination arm in which evofosfamide was administered along with gemcitabine.
Time frame: Monotherapy: pre-dose, 0.25, 0.5, 0.58, 0.75, 1, 1.08, 1.25, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3.5, 4.5, 6.5, 8.5, 12.5 hours post-dose on Day 1 and 15; Combination therapy: pre-dose, 0.5, 0.66, 1, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 4.5, 6.5, 8, 10.5, 26.5 hours post-dose on Day 1 and 15
Area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 to the last quantifiable concentration was assessed.
Time frame: Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, and 24 hours post-dose on Day 1 and 15
Area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 to the last quantifiable concentration was assessed. This outcome was applicable for only combination arm in which evofosfamide was administered along with gemcitabine.
Time frame: Monotherapy: pre-dose, 0.25, 0.5, 0.58, 0.75, 1, 1.08, 1.25, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3.5, 4.5, 6.5, 8.5, 12.5 hours post-dose on Day 1 and 15; Combination therapy: pre-dose, 0.5, 0.66, 1, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 4.5, 6.5, 8, 10.5, 26.5 hours post-dose on Day 1 and 15
Area under the concentration-time curve from time zero extrapolated to infinity, calculated as AUC(0-last) + last observed concentration (Clast)/terminal rate constant (λz), using the linear trapezoidal rule for increasing concentrations and the logarithmic rule for decreasing concentrations. Where AUC(0-last) is area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 to the last quantifiable concentration was assessed. λz was determined from the terminal slope of the log-transformed plasma concentration curve using linear regression on terminal data points of the curve.
Time frame: Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, and 24 hours post-dose on Day 1 and 15
Area under the concentration-time curve from time zero extrapolated to infinity, calculated as AUC(0-last) + last observed concentration (Clast)/terminal rate constant (λz), using the linear trapezoidal rule for increasing concentrations and the logarithmic rule for decreasing concentrations. Where AUC(0-last) is area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 to the last quantifiable concentration was assessed. λz was determined from the terminal slope of the log-transformed plasma concentration curve using linear regression on terminal data points of the curve. This outcome was applicable for only combination arm in which evofosfamide was administered along with gemcitabine.
Time frame: Monotherapy: pre-dose, 0.25, 0.5, 0.58, 0.75, 1, 1.08, 1.25, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3.5, 4.5, 6.5, 8.5, 12.5 hours post-dose on Day 1 and 15; Combination therapy: pre-dose, 0.5, 0.66, 1, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 4.5, 6.5, 8, 10.5, 26.5 hours post-dose on Day 1 and 15
Apparent total clearance (CL/F) was calculated as dose divided by area under the plasma concentration-time profile from time zero extrapolated to infinity (AUC[inf]).
Time frame: Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, and 24 hours post-dose on Day 1 and 15
Apparent total clearance (CL/F) was calculated as dose divided by area under the plasma concentration-time profile from time zero extrapolated to infinity (AUC[inf]). This outcome was applicable for only combination arm in which evofosfamide was administered along with gemcitabine.
Time frame: Monotherapy: pre-dose, 0.25, 0.5, 0.58, 0.75, 1, 1.08, 1.25, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3.5, 4.5, 6.5, 8.5, 12.5 hours post-dose on Day 1 and 15; Combination therapy: pre-dose, 0.5, 0.66, 1, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 4.5, 6.5, 8, 10.5, 26.5 hours post-dose on Day 1 and 15
Volume of distribution was defined as the theoretical volume in which the total amount of drug would need to be uniformly distributed to produce the desired blood concentration of a drug. Steady state volume of distribution (Vss) was the apparent volume of distribution at steady-state.
Time frame: Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, and 24 hours post-dose on Day 1 and 15
Volume of distribution was defined as the theoretical volume in which the total amount of drug would need to be uniformly distributed to produce the desired blood concentration of a drug. Steady state volume of distribution (Vss) was the apparent volume of distribution at steady-state. This outcome was applicable for only combination arm in which evofosfamide was administered along with gemcitabine.
Time frame: Monotherapy: pre-dose, 0.25, 0.5, 0.58, 0.75, 1, 1.08, 1.25, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3.5, 4.5, 6.5, 8.5, 12.5 hours post-dose on Day 1 and 15; Combination therapy: pre-dose, 0.5, 0.66, 1, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 4.5, 6.5, 8, 10.5, 26.5 hours post-dose on Day 1 and 15
Apparent volume of distribution during the terminal phase, calculated as Vz = Dose/AUC0-inf multiplied by elimination rate constant [λz]) following single dose. Area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity, calculated (AUC0-inf) as AUC0-t + AUCextra. AUCextra represents an extrapolated value obtained by Clast / λz, where Clast is the calculated serum concentration at the last sampling time point at which the measured plasma concentration is at or above lower limit of quantification (LLQ) and λz is the elimination rate constant. And the elimination rate constant obtained from linear regression of the terminal phase of the log transformed concentration-time data.
Time frame: Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, and 24 hours post-dose on Day 1 and 15
Apparent volume of distribution during the terminal phase, calculated as Vz = Dose/AUC0-inf multiplied by elimination rate constant [λz]) following single dose. Area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity, calculated (AUC0-inf) as AUC0-t + AUCextra. AUCextra represents an extrapolated value obtained by Clast / λz, where Clast is the calculated serum concentration at the last sampling time point at which the measured plasma concentration is at or above lower limit of quantification (LLQ) and λz is the elimination rate constant. And the elimination rate constant obtained from linear regression of the terminal phase of the log transformed concentration-time data. This outcome was applicable for only combination arm in which evofosfamide was administered along with gemcitabine.
Time frame: Monotherapy: pre-dose, 0.25, 0.5, 0.58, 0.75, 1, 1.08, 1.25, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3.5, 4.5, 6.5, 8.5, 12.5 hours post-dose on Day 1 and 15; Combination therapy: pre-dose, 0.5, 0.66, 1, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 4.5, 6.5, 8, 10.5, 26.5 hours post-dose on Day 1 and 15
Cumulative amount excreted in urine from time zero to the end of the last measurable concentration was reported.
Time frame: Monotherapy: pre-dose, 0.25, 0.5, 0.58, 0.75, 1, 1.08, 1.25, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3.5, 4.5, 6.5, 8.5, 12.5 hours post-dose on Day 1 and 15; Combination therapy: pre-dose, 0.5, 0.66, 1, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 4.5, 6.5, 8, 10.5, 26.5 hours post-dose on Day 1 and 15
Renal clearance is the volume of plasma from which the drug is completely removed by the kidney in a given amount of time.
Time frame: Time from first treatment to final assessment at 33 months
BOR was determined according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1). BOR was defined as the best response of any of the confirmed complete response (CR), confirmed partial response (PR), stable disease (SD) and progressive disease (PD). CR: Disappearance of all evidence of target and non-target lesions. PR: At least 30% reduction from baseline in the sum of the longest diameter (SLD) of all lesions. Stable disease (SD)=Neither sufficient increase to qualify for PD nor sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR. PD was defined as at least a 20 percent (%) increase in the SLD, taking as reference the smallest SLD recorded from baseline or the appearance of 1 or more new lesions. Number of participants with CR, PR, SD and PD were reported.
Time frame: Time from first treatment to final assessment at 33 months
OR was determined according to RECIST v1.1. Objective response is defined as a best overall response of confirmed complete response (CR) or partial response (PR). CR: Disappearance of all evidence of target and non-target lesions. PR: At least 30% reduction from baseline in the sum of the longest diameter (SLD) of all lesions. Number of participants with OR were reported.
Time frame: Time from first treatment to final assessment at 33 months
Disease Control was defined as having achieved at least disease stabilization; that is participants with confirmed CR, PR, or SD lasting for at least 16 weeks. CR: Disappearance of all target lesions. PR: A decrease of at least 30% in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions. PD: PD is defined as at least a 20 percent (%) increase in the SLD, taking as reference the smallest SLD recorded from baseline or the appearance of 1 or more new lesions. SD: Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for partial response nor sufficient increase to qualify for progressive disease.
Time frame: Baseline up to 33 months
Clinical laboratory parameters that were assessed included: hematological parameters, blood chemistry parameters, coagulation and urinalysis and the vital signs that were assessed included: blood pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate, and body temperature.
Time frame: Baseline up to 33 months
Twelve-lead ECGs were performed and assessed after at least 5 minutes rest in supine position locally.
Time frame: Baseline up to 33 months
ECOG performance status measured to assess subject's performance status on a scale of 0 to 5, where 0=Fully active, able to carry on all pre-disease activities without restriction; 1=Restricted in physically strenuous activity, ambulatory and able to carry out light or sedentary work; 2=Ambulatory (more than 50% of waking hours), capable of all self-care, unable to carry out any work activities; 3=Capable of only limited self-care, confined to bed or chair more than 50% of waking hours; 4=Completely disabled, cannot carry on any self-care, totally confined to bed/chair; 5=Death. Number of participants with ECOG performance status score of 2 or higher than 2 were reported.
Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany
Industry
A Japanese Single Center, Open-label, Phase I Trial of TH-302 Given Intravenously to Subjects With Solid Tumors as Monotherapy or to Subjects With Advanced Pancreatic Cancer in Combination With Gemcitabine
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05708950
Adnexal Diseases, Breast Cancer
Santa Monica, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04666688
Bile Duct Diseases, Bile Duct Neoplasms
Los Angeles, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04731467
Adenocarcinoma, Adenocarcinoma, Papillary
Scottsdale, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT02791334
Breast Cancer (HR+HER2-), Breast Diseases
Nashville, Tennessee, United States
View Trial Details