Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Active, Not Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT04665297

A Hybrid Effectiveness/Implementation Trial of the International Guide for Monitoring Child Development

The aim of this study is to conduct a hybrid effectiveness/implementation assessment of the International Guide for Monitoring Child Development (GMCD) in two LMIC settings, India and Guatemala, within established rural CHW programs. The primary objectives are (a) to evaluate the real-world effectiveness of the GMCD; (b) to use an implementation science framework to understand barriers and facilitators to effective population coverage, provider implementation, and maintenance; (c) to conduct an economic evaluation of the GMCD.

Active, Not Recruiting

This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

Age range

0 month–24 month

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Wuqu' Kawoq, Tecpán Guatemala, Guatemala

Loading trial locations.

About this study

Specific Aim 1: Assess the effectiveness of the GMCD intervention to improve developmental outcomes and nurturing care in India and Guatemala. The investigators will conduct a parallel-arm cluster randomized trial within rural CHW programs. In the primary effectiveness phase, children under 2 years old will receive the GMCD intervention or control for 12 months. Subsequently, control clusters will cross into the intervention, and continue an additional 12 months (total 24 study months). The primary developmental effectiveness outcome will be change in age-adjusted scores at 12 months on the Bayley Scales of Infant Development, 4th Edition BSID4) (3). The secondary nurturing care effectiveness outcome will be change in mean Home Observation for Measurement of the Environment (HOME) score at 12 months (4).

Specific Aim 2: Assess barriers and facilitators to GMCD implementation using the RE-AIM evaluation framework (5). RE-AIM domains will be assessed as: (a) Reach: participation rates, comparison of participant/non-participant characteristics, attendance/drop-out; (b) Effectiveness: impact on development (BSID4) and nurturing environment (HOME) [in Aim 1]; (c) Adoption: proportion of workers/facilities participating, CHW characteristics; (d) Implementation: contact hours/visit completion, fidelity to delivery protocols; (e) Maintenance: patient outcomes and cost effectiveness analysis at 12-24 months [in Aim 3]; intent by decision makers and implementers to continue intervention. In addition, the investigators will conduct a sequential quantitative-->qualitative explanatory analysis, using interviews and focus groups with implementers from clusters with highest/lowest impact outcomes (BSID4/HOME) to explore institutional inner and outer setting and implementation processes associated with intervention success, using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR).

Specific Aim 3: Conduct an economic evaluation of the GMCD intervention. Evaluation will assess (a) costs of the interventions at 12 and 24 months; and (b) cost-effectiveness of the intervention (dollar per unit increase in BSID or HOME scores) at 12 months. This analysis will provide cost information to policymakers to help guide resource allocation decisions for ECD interventions.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • age 0-24 months at the time of enrollment visit
  • receiving health services from frontline health workers of Maya Health Alliance (Guatemala), Mahatma Gandhi Institute (India) or their local partners

Exclusion criteria

  • children who are critically ill and are judged by the frontline health worker to require hospitalization or center-based care
  • children whose caregivers do not provide informed consent for the study

Treatment and study plan

International Guide for Monitoring Child Development

Behavioral

Monthly GMCD visits includes assessment of risk factors, open-ended exploration of caregiver concerns about development, assessment of functioning in seven developmental domains, and using mutual problem solving strategies to develop a nurturing care plan with the caregiver.

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Composite Language Score at 12 months

    Time frame: Change from 0 to 12 months

    Using the Bayley Scales of Infant Development, 4th Edition (BSID4), higher scores better, scale range 47-153

  2. Change in Composite Motor Score at 12 months

    Time frame: Change from 0 to 12 months

    Using the Bayley Scales of Infant Development, 4th Edition (BSID4), higher scores better, scale range 46-154

  3. Change in Composite Cognitive Score at 12 months

    Time frame: Change from 0 to 12 months

    Using the Bayley Scales of Infant Development, 4th Edition (BSID4), higher scores better, scale range 55-145

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in the Home Observation for Measurement of the Environment Scale (HOME) Raw Score

    Time frame: Change from 0 to 12 months

    Raw score range 0-45, higher scores better

Other outcomes

  1. Change in Composite Language Score at 24 months

    Time frame: Change from 0 to 24 months

    Using the Bayley Scales of Infant Development, 4th Edition (BSID4), higher scores better, scale range 47-153

  2. Change in Composite Motor Score at 24 months

    Time frame: Change from 0 to 24 months

    Using the Bayley Scales of Infant Development, 4th Edition (BSID4), higher scores better, scale range 46-154

  3. Change in Composite Cognitive Score at 24 months

    Time frame: Change from 0 to 24 months

    Using the Bayley Scales of Infant Development, 4th Edition (BSID4), higher scores better, scale range 55-145

  4. Change in the Home Observation for Measurement of the Environment Scale (HOME) Raw Score

    Time frame: Change from 0 to 24 months

    Raw score range 0-45, higher scores better

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Brigham and Women's Hospital

Other

Collaborators

  • Ankara University
  • Harvard Medical School (HMS and HSDM)
  • Mahatma Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences
  • Ummeed Child Development Center
  • University of Washington
  • Wuqu' Kawoq, Maya Health Alliance

Registry information

Official study title

An Individualized Approach to Promote Nurturing Care in Low and Middle Income Countries: A Hybrid Effectiveness/Implementation Trial of the International Guide for Monitoring Child Development

Important dates

Study start
2023
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2026
First posted
Dec 11, 2020
Registry last updated
Mar 3, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.