Height Measurement in Critically Ill Children
NCT03572504
Critically Ill Child, Height
Strasbourg, France
View Trial DetailsNCT Number: NCT06920550
This is a data collection and machine learning accuracy testing project that aims to a) collect training data to enhance, by machine learning, an artificial intelligence (AI) algorithm for measuring length in infants and young children and b) test the accuracy of the AI algorithm by comparing the AI predicted length with the gold standard measured length. Images and videos will be collected by care givers and healthcare professionals, together with physical length measurements. These data will be used to train the AI algorithm and to explore potential improvements. Other data to be collected is user experience feedback.
This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.
0 month–24 month
All sexes
Observational
Franciscus Gasthuis, Rotterdam, Netherlands
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Time frame: Date of enrolment, at baseline
Accuracy of the Length AI vs length gold standard (WHO methodology with length board in cm) assessed using several different parameters: the bias (cm), agreement and reliability measures, mean absolute error (cm), mean absolute percentage error (%), percentiles of the absolute error (cm), and root mean square error (cm).
Time frame: Date of enrolment, at baseline
Accuracy of the caregiver measured length (own preferred methodology in cm) vs gold standard measured length (WHO methodology with length board in cm), assessed by same parameters as mentioned in the first primary outcome measure.
Time frame: Date of enrolment, at baseline
Accuracy of the caregiver measurements (self preferred methodology in cm) vs Length AI by same parameters as mentioned in the first primary outcome measure.
Time frame: Date of enrolment, at baseline
Accuracy of the Weight AI vs weight gold standard (WHO methodology with digital scale and tared weighing in kg) assessed using several different parameters: the bias (kg), agreement and reliability measures, mean absolute error (kg), mean absolute percentage error (%), percentiles of the absolute error (kg), and root mean square error (kg).
Time frame: Date of enrolment, at baseline
Accuracy of the caregiver measured weight (self preferred methodology in kg) vs weight gold standard (WHO methodology with digital scale and tared weighing in kg), assessed using several different parameters as mentioned in the first secondary outcome measure.
Time frame: Date of enrolment, at baseline
The ease of taking images and videos with the tool "GAINS app" on personal mobile device of the caregiver, assessed via a custom made user experience questionnaire.
Time frame: Date of enrolment, at baseline
The expectation and acceptability of the tool "GAINS app" on a personal mobile device of the caregiver, assessed via a custom made user experience questionnaire.
Nutricia Research
Industry
Acronym: GAINS
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03572504
Critically Ill Child, Height
Strasbourg, France
View Trial DetailsNCT06864208
Behavior, Behavior, Animal
Providence, Rhode Island, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT02456090
Body Weight, Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07713394
Behavior, Body Weight
Erzurum, Turkey, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial Details