faslodex 500mg
Drug2 x intramuscular injections at day 1, 14, 28 and every 28 days thereafter
NCT Number: NCT01602380
The purpose of the study is to compare how treatment with Fulvestrant (FASLODEX) or Anastrozole (ARIMIDEX) effects disease progression for women with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer who have not had prior hormonal treatment.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–130 year
Female
Interventional
Phase 3
Research Site, La Rioja, Argentina
A Randomised, Double-blind, Parallel-group, Multicentre, Phase III Study to Compare the Efficacy and Tolerability of Fulvestrant (FASLODEX) 500 mg with Anastrozole (ARIMIDEX) 1 mg as Hormonal Treatment for Postmenopausal Women with Hormone Receptor-Positive Locally Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer Who Have Not Previously Been Treated With Any Hormonal Therapy.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
2 x intramuscular injections at day 1, 14, 28 and every 28 days thereafter
oral tablet 1 daily
2 x intramuscular injections at day 1, 14, 28 and every 28 days thereafter
oral tablet 1 daily
Time frame: Baseline RECIST 1.1 assessments (Day 0) and then every 12 weeks until the earliest of disease progression evident, patient dies or has surgery/radiotherapy for their disease (up to approximately 38 months)
PFS was defined as the time from randomisation until objective disease progression according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1), surgery or radiotherapy to manage worsening of disease or death by any cause (in the absence of progression). Outcome measure is reported as median time from randomisation to PFS, calculated using the Kaplan-Meier technique.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 0) up to data cut-off for final analysis (up to approximately 116 months). Following disease progression, patients were to be contacted at 12 weekly intervals to determine survival status
OS was defined as the time from randomisation until death by any cause. The current OS data correspond to that of the final analysis and the outcome measure is reported as percentage of patients with events.
Time frame: Baseline RECIST 1.1 assessments (Day 0) and then every 12 weeks until disease progression or treatment discontinuation (up to approximately 38 months)
ORR was defined as the percentage patients with an objective response (i.e. those recording a partial response [PR] or complete response [CR]) at some point during the study, prior to disease progression. ORR was assessed in patients with measurable disease at baseline only. The determination of measurable disease at baseline was done using baseline RECIST data. CR was disappearance of all target lesions since baseline; was any pathological lymph nodes selected as target lesions (TL) to have a reduction in short axis to <10 millimeter. PR was at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the diameters of TL, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters.
Time frame: Baseline RECIST 1.1 assessments (Day 0) and then every 12 weeks until disease progression or treatment discontinuation (up to approximately 38 months)
DoR was defined only for patients who had an objective response, as the time in days from date of first documentation of response (CR/PR) until date of disease progression. CR was disappearance of all target lesions since baseline; any pathological lymph nodes selected as TL to have a reduction in short axis to <10 mm. At least a 30% decrease in the sum of the diameters of TL, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters.
Time frame: Baseline RECIST 1.1 assessments and then every 12 weeks until disease progression or treatment discontinuation (up to approximately 38 months)
EDoR was estimated using the formula EDoR = p Efp(x), where x = DoR, p = proportion of responders, and Efp(x) = mean duration of response for responders. The estimation was completed by using the maximum likelihood estimates of p and Efp(x), as described by Ellis (Ellis S et al. Analysis of duration of response in oncology trials, Contemp Clin Trials 2008; 29:456-65).
Time frame: Baseline RECIST 1.1 assessments (Day 0) and then every 12 weeks until disease progression or treatment discontinuation (up to approximately 38 months)
CBR was defined as the percentage of patients who had a clinical benefit (i.e. best objective response of CR, PR or stable disease), that was maintained for at least 24 weeks, prior to any evidence of progression. Note that a minimum duration of 22 weeks for CBR was applicable in the analysis (rather than 24 weeks) to allow for the protocolled window of +/-2 weeks.
Time frame: Baseline RECIST 1.1 assessments (Day 0) and then every 12 weeks until disease progression or treatment discontinuation (up to approximately 38 months)
DoCB was defined only for patients who had clinical benefit, as the time in days from date of randomisation until the date of disease progression.
Time frame: Baseline RECIST 1.1 assessments (Day 0) and then every 12 weeks until disease progression or treatment discontinuation (up to approximately 38 months)
EDoCB was estimated using the formula EDoCB = p Efp(x), where x = EDoCB, p = proportion of responders, and Efp(x) = mean duration of response for responders. The estimation was completed by using the maximum likelihood estimates of p and Efp(x), as described by Ellis (Ellis S et al. Analysis of duration of response in oncology trials, Contemp Clin Trials 2008; 29:456-65).
Time frame: Quality of life questionnaires administered at 3 months post objective disease progression, then at 6-monthly intervals (approximately 75 months)
The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Breast (FACT-B) questionnaire was the instrument selected to assess HRQoL and comprised of following subscales: physical well-being (PWB), functional well-being (FWB), social well-being, emotional well-being, and breast cancer subscale (BCS). The main outcome measure from the FACT-B questionnaire was the Trial Outcome Index (TOI), which was a summary of the following subscales: PWB, FWB, and BCS. Outcome measure is reported as median time to deterioration, defined as the interval from the date of baseline of final analysis to the first assessment of worsened without an improvement in the next 12 weeks in FACT-B TOI, or the date of death (by any cause in the absence of symptom deterioration). Time to deterioration as measured by FACT-B total score was derived similarly and is also reported.
AstraZeneca
Industry
A Randomised, Double-blind, Parallel-group, Multicentre, Phase III Study to Compare the Efficacy and Tolerability of Fulvestrant (FASLODEX) 500 mg With Anastrozole (ARIMIDEX) 1 mg as Hormonal Treatment for Postmenopausal Women With Hormone Receptor-Positive Locally Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer Who Have Not Previously Been Treated With Any Hormonal Therapy.
Acronym: FALCON
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03854903
Breast Diseases, Breast Neoplasms
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06805812
Abemaciclib, Breast Adenocarcinoma
Aviano, Italy
View Trial DetailsNCT02675231
HER-2 Positive Breast Cancer, Hormone Receptor Positive Breast Cancer
Bakersfield, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03227328
Breast Diseases, Breast Neoplasms
Bologna, BO, Italy
View Trial Details