Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC) Department of Anesthesiology
Leiden, 2333 ZA, Netherlands
NCT Number: NCT05731999
This is a pre-market, explorative, early feasibility, pilot, controlled clinical investigation designed to collect initial clinical data on the medical device Previct Drugs.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–70 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Leiden, 2333 ZA, Netherlands
This first study will give valuable information on the feasibility of Previct Drugs function to measure pupils and eye movements and to evaluate if there are any changes in the pupillometric parameters before and after intake of a medicinal product. It will also provide information on the usability of the device. Drug intake will in this first investigation be simulated by a controlled single application of commonly therapeutically used medicinal products from the following classes of drugs: phenethylamines (D1), benzodiazepines (D2), cannabinoids (D3), and opioids (D4).
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Previct Drugs is a new non CE-marked eHealth system intended to be used for future monitoring and treatment of patients with substance use disorder (SUD). Previct Drugs consists of an application (app) to be installed on a smartphone, a web-based careportal to be accessed from a computer by the healthcare professional for administration and access of registered data, and a database for storage, handling, and analysis of reported data. Previct Drugs is intended to be used by healthcare professionals and patients within treatment of SUD.
Time frame: Day 7 +/- 2 days (Visit 2)
For each medicinal product (D1-D4), the fraction of collected pupillometry data from the mobile phone application at baseline and under the influence of D1-D4, which can be transformed into pre-defined key features using native pupillogram. A key feature represents an eye characteristic (such as pupil size, iris position, and the similar). A successful transformation is characterised by underlying quality control algorithms approving the extracted magnitude, where poor quality pupillograms are rejected from analysis. Each attempt to transform a pupillogram into key features is denoted an "Attempt", and the successful transformation is denoted a "Successful attempt".
Time frame: Day 7 +/- 2 days (Visit 2)
For each medicinal product (D1-D4), the fraction of collected pupillometry data from the mobile phone application at baseline and under the influence of D1-D4, which can be transformed into pre-defined key features using refined pupillogram. A key feature represents an eye characteristic (such as pupil size, iris position, and the similar). A successful transformation is characterised by underlying quality control algorithms approving the extracted magnitude, where poor quality pupillograms are rejected from analysis. Each attempt to transform a pupillogram into key features is denoted an "Attempt", and the successful transformation is denoted a "Successful attempt.
Time frame: Day 7 +/- 2 days (Visit 2)
For each medicinal product (D1-D4), number of changed key features from baseline to the LC-MS/MS (Liquid Chromatography Tandem Mass-Spectroscopy) verified peak concentration in plasma after administration of medicinal product at visit 2 using refined pupillograms. Each of the 24 key features represents an eye characteristic (such as pupil size, iris position, and the similar). A key feature is considered "changed" if the difference between averages at baseline and peak concentration is significant (p<0.05). Key features were available from two conditions, one condition where pupillograms and corresponding key features were collected in dim ambient light (50 Lux) and one condition where pupillograms and corresponding key features were collected in bright ambient light (500 Lux). The Outcome Measure is reported for both ambient light conditions.
Time frame: Day 7 +/- 2 days (Visit 2)
For each medicinal product (D1-D4), number of significant correlations between key features and plasma concentration over time using refined pupillograms. A key feature represents an eye characteristic (such as pupil size, iris position, and the similar). A key feature is considered "correlated" if the slope in a linear regression is significantly different from zero (p<0.05). The term correlated over time refers to data collected during 5 hours at Visit 2 after administration of D1-D4. Key features were available from two conditions, one condition where pupillograms and corresponding key features were collected in dim ambient light (50 Lux) and one condition where pupillograms and corresponding key features were collected in bright ambient light (500 Lux). The Outcome Measure is reported for both ambient light conditions.
Time frame: Day 7 +/- 2 days (Visit 2)
For each medicinal product (D1-D4), number of changed key features from baseline to 5 hours after administration of medicinal product at visit 2 using refined pupillograms. A key feature represents an eye characteristic (such as pupil size, iris position, and the similar). A key feature is considered "changed" if the difference between averages at baseline and at 5 hours is significant (p<0.05). Key features were available from two conditions, one condition where pupillograms and corresponding key features were collected in dim ambient light (50 Lux) and one condition where pupillograms and corresponding key features were collected in bright ambient light (500 Lux). The Outcome Measure is reported for both ambient light conditions.
Time frame: Day 7 +/- 2 days (Visit 2)
For each medicinal product (D1-D4), evaluate known combinations of key features that changes from baseline to the LC-MS/MS verified peak concentration in plasma after administration of medicinal product at visit 2 using refined pupillograms. A key feature represents an eye characteristic (such as pupil size, iris position, and the similar). A combination of key features collected at peak plasma concentration was used to build a logistic regression classifier, and the resulting counts of true positives, true negatives, false positives, and false negatives are presented. Key features were available from two conditions, one condition where pupillograms and corresponding key features were collected in dim ambient light (50 Lux) and one condition where pupillograms and corresponding key features were collected in bright ambient light (500 Lux). The Outcome Measure is reported for both ambient light conditions. Key feature values were missing in a few instances, as shown in the table.
Time frame: Day 7 +/- 2 days (Visit 2)
User-friendliness of Previct Drugs evaluated by the subject at visit 2. Question 1. How would you grade the instructions for use?
Response options:
Time frame: Day 7 +/- 2 days (Visit 2)
User-friendliness of Previct Drugs evaluated by the subject at visit 2. Question 2. Was Previct Drugs easy to use correctly based on the information in the Instructions For Use (IFU)?
Response options:
Time frame: Day 7 +/- 2 days (Visit 2)
User-friendliness of Previct Drugs evaluated by the subject at visit 2. Question 4. How did you experience the verbal instructions during a test with Previct Drugs?
Response options:
Time frame: Day 7 +/- 2 days (Visit 2)
User-friendliness of Previct Drugs evaluated by the subject at visit 2. Question 5. Before starting a test, the App prompted you with a few written instructions. Did you read the instructions?
Response options:
Time frame: Day 7 +/- 2 days (Visit 2)
User-friendliness of Previct Drugs evaluated by the subject at visit 2. Question 7. How did you experience performing a test with Previct Drugs (from opening of the App until the test was completed)?
Response options:
Time frame: Day 7 +/- 2 days (Visit 2)
User-friendliness of Previct Drugs evaluated by the subject at visit 2. Question 8. During a test with Previct Drugs, did you at any time have to tilt the mobile against something to be able to perform a measurement?
Response options:
Time frame: Day 7 +/- 2 days (Visit 2)
User-friendliness of Previct Drugs evaluated by the subject at visit 2.
Question 9. If Yes (to question 8), how often did you have to tilt the mobile against something:
Response options:
Time frame: Day 7 +/- 2 days (Visit 2)
User-friendliness of Previct Drugs evaluated by the subject at visit 2. Question 10. According to you, how many minutes did a test with Previct Drugs take in general? From start to end.
Response options:
Time frame: Day 7 +/- 2 days (Visit 2)
User-friendliness of Previct Drugs evaluated by the subject at visit 2. Question 11. Did you receive a notification when it was time for a test with Previct Drugs?
Response options:
Time frame: Day 7 +/- 2 days (Visit 2)
User-friendliness of Previct Drugs evaluated by the subject at visit 2. Question 12. Did you notice any issues during usage of Previct Drugs?
Response options:
Time frame: Day 7 +/- 2 days (Visit 2)
User-friendliness of Previct Drugs evaluated by the subject at visit 2. Question 13. Did you require any assistance from the study personnel (e.g., through phone) during the usage of Previct Drugs?
Response options:
Time frame: Day 7 +/- 2 days (Visit 2)
User-friendliness of Previct Drugs evaluated by the subject at visit 2. Question 15. If Yes (to question 13), how often did you require assistance?
Response options:
Time frame: Day 7 +/- 2 days (Visit 2)
User-friendliness of Previct Drugs evaluated by the subject at visit 2. Question 16. When starting a measurement, how was your experience finding the right conditions to start the measurement?
Response options:
Time frame: Day 7 +/- 2 days (Visit 2)
User-friendliness of Previct Drugs evaluated by the subject at visit 2. Question 18. How did you experience performing a Nystagmus (look to your extreme right and left) test?
Response options:
Time frame: Day 7 +/- 2 days (Visit 2)
User-friendliness of Previct Drugs evaluated by the subject at visit 2. Question 20. According to you, how many minutes did a Nystagmus test take (from starting test until analyzed)?
Response options:
Time frame: Day 7 +/- 2 days (Visit 2)
User-friendliness of Previct Drugs evaluated by the subject at visit 2. Question 21. How often did you have to redo a Nystagmus test?
Response options:
Time frame: Day 7 +/- 2 days (Visit 2)
User-friendliness of Previct Drugs evaluated by the subject at visit 2. Question 23. In general, how easy is it for you to cross your eyes?
Response options:
Time frame: Day 7 +/- 2 days (Visit 2)
User-friendliness of Previct Drugs evaluated by the subject at visit 2. Question 24. How did you experience performing a Cross Eyes test?
Response options:
Time frame: Day 7 +/- 2 days (Visit 2)
User-friendliness of Previct Drugs evaluated by the subject at visit 2. Question 26. According to you, how many minutes did a Cross Eyes test take (from starting until analyzed)?
Response options:
Time frame: Day 7 +/- 2 days (Visit 2)
User-friendliness of Previct Drugs evaluated by the subject at visit 2. Question 27. How often did you have to redo a Cross Eyes test?
Response options:
Time frame: Day 7 +/- 2 days (Visit 2)
User-friendliness of Previct Drugs evaluated by the subject at visit 2. Question 29. How did you experience performing a Contraction test?
Response options:
Time frame: Day 7 +/- 2 days (Visit 2)
User-friendliness of Previct Drugs evaluated by the subject at visit 2. Question 31. How was your experience turning your mobile when asked to?
Response options:
Time frame: Day 7 +/- 2 days (Visit 2)
User-friendliness of Previct Drugs evaluated by the subject at visit 2. Question 33. According to you, how many minutes did a Contraction test take (from starting test until analyzed)?
Response options:
Time frame: Day 7 +/- 2 days (Visit 2)
User-friendliness of Previct Drugs evaluated by the subject at visit 2. Question 34. How often did you have to redo a Contraction test?
Response options:
Kontigo Care AB
Industry
A First-in-human Explorative Pilot Study in Healthy Volunteers Measuring Eye Parameters With a New Mobile Phone Application for Future Monitoring of Patients in Treatment of Substance Use Disorder
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT00787423
Chemically-Induced Disorders, Drug Abuse
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT01036685
Chemically-Induced Disorders, Drug Abuse
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03918850
Chemically-Induced Disorders, Congenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and Abnormalities
Jacksonville, Florida, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07552623
Chemically-Induced Disorders, Disease Attributes
Lahore, Punjab Province, Pakistan
View Trial Details