South Valley Committee
Qina, Egypt
NCT Number: NCT06825351
his feasibility study aims to compare the effectiveness of Psychological First Aid (PFA) and Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT) interventions in reducing suicide risk among undergraduate students. The study employs a crossover randomized controlled trial design, allowing participants to experience both interventions at different times.
This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.
Notify Me18 year–27 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Qina, Egypt
Suicide risk among undergraduate students is a pressing mental health concern, exacerbated by academic pressures and social isolation. Psychological First Aid (PFA) is a supportive intervention designed to reduce distress and foster coping in the immediate aftermath of a crisis. Conversely, Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT) is a structured, evidence-based therapy that focuses on emotional regulation, interpersonal effectiveness, and distress tolerance. This study explores the feasibility and effectiveness of these two interventions in a university setting.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Participants in this feasibility study must be undergraduate students aged 18-25 years who are identified as at risk for suicide based on a validated screening tool. They must be currently enrolled in a degree program, able to provide informed consent, and proficient in English.
Exclusion criteria
Individuals with severe mental illnesses (e.g., schizophrenia, bipolar disorder), those in acute crisis requiring immediate intervention, current substance abuse issues, significant cognitive impairments, prior experience with DBT or similar therapies within the last year, and physical health conditions that could complicate participation.
PFA is an immediate, supportive intervention aimed at helping individuals in distress. It focuses on providing emotional support and practical assistance in the aftermath of a crisis.
Key Components:
Safety and Comfort: Ensuring that participants feel safe and secure in their environment.
Active Listening: Engaging in empathetic listening to validate participants' feelings and experiences.
Assessment of Needs: Identifying immediate needs and concerns, including emotional and practical aspects.
Information and Resources: Providing clear information about available resources, such as mental health services and coping strategies.
Encouragement of Social Support: Guiding participants to connect with friends, family, or support groups.
Time frame: 3 months
It is a brief and reliable tool for assessing the severity of suicidal ideation over the past month, was developed by Van Spijker et al, (2014). It comprises five items that evaluate the frequency of suicidal thoughts, the level of control over these thoughts, proximity to a suicide attempt, the distress caused by the thoughts, and their impact on daily functioning.
Time frame: 3 months
It is a 10-item scale to evaluate attitudes toward seeking psychological help. Responses are rated on a 4-point Likert scale ranging from 0 to 3, with higher scores indicating more favourable attitudes and lower stigma associated with mental illness
Time frame: 3 months
It was developed by Bedewy, D., & Gabriel, A. (2015), to measure sources of academic stress among university students. PAS IS an 18-item, 5-point Likert-type questionnaire designed, with a higher score indicating higher academic stress.
Time frame: 3 months
It is a six-item self-report measure designed to assess resilience by Smith et al. (2008), specifically focusing on an individual's ability to bounce back or recover from stress. Unlike other resilience scales emphasizing resources or traits promoting resilience, the BRS directly evaluates recovery and adaptability following stressful events.
Time frame: 3 months
It was developed by Dr. Kristin Neff, is a widely recognized tool designed to measure self-compassion, which encompasses being kind and understanding toward oneself in times of difficulty.
Alexandria University
Other
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05988489
Behavior, Behavioral Symptoms
Syracuse, New York, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07717866
Behavior, Behavioral Symptoms
Northridge, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05795764
Behavior, Behavioral Symptoms
San Diego, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06233747
Behavior, Behavioral Symptoms
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
View Trial Details