Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03771014

A Feasibility Study of Early Mobilisation Programmes in Critical Care

The objective of this study is to determine the feasibility of delivering a very early mobility rehabilitation program in Intensive Care Units (ICU), within the context of a randomised controlled trial (RCT). This will inform the design of a future RCT investigating very early ICU rehabilitation in the UK National Health Service.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

Critical Illness Disease Attributes Pathologic Processes Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Age range

42 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Medway NHS Foundation Trust

Gillingham, Kent, United Kingdom

About this study

Early ICU-based physical rehabilitation may benefit patients with acute severe respiratory failure by attenuating the development of severe and persistent weakness and impaired physical function seen in these patients.

Muscle wasting occurs early (within 12 hours) and progresses rapidly after ICU admission. Patients may suffer from consequent physical impairment for months or years following their discharge.

ICU based rehabilitation has the potential to improve physical function outcomes, through mitigating muscle wasting.

The investigators have successfully introduced a very early ICU mobility program in their institution, which results in increased ventilator free days and reduced length of ICU stay.

The primary aim is to investigate whether this method will work in other ICUs. EMPRESS will test the feasibility of running this intervention as an RCT. The results and a concurrent process evaluation will inform the design of a future, multi-centre randomised controlled trial.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Acute/unplanned medical admissions to the ICU.
  • > 42 years old.
  • Functionally independent prior to ICU admission (Barthel >80).
  • In hospital for <5 days prior to intubation and ventilation.
  • Intubated and ventilated for <72 hrs.
  • Expected to remain ventilated for a further 48 hours.

Exclusion criteria

  • In hospital for 5 days or more prior to ITU admission.
  • Patients with acute brain or spinal cord injury.
  • Known or suspected neurological / muscular impairment.
  • Condition limiting use of cycle ergometer e.g. lower limb fracture / amputation.
  • Not expected to survive >48hrs.
  • Persistent therapy exemptions in first 3 days of mechanical ventilation.
  • Body habitus such as unable to use cycle ergometer.
  • Consultant clinician view that patient not suitable or not expected to survive admission.

Treatment and study plan

Early mobility

Other

This progressive mobility pathway commenced with passive cycling within 48 hours of intubation and ventilation and progressing through assisted cycling, active cycling, bed exercises, sitting, mobilising out of bed to walking

Primary outcomes

  1. Physical Function ICU Test-scored

    Time frame: Up to 28 days

    This is a reliable and valid 4 item scale ( arm strength, leg strength, ability to stand and step cadence),with a score range of 0-10 and is responsive to change and predictive of key outcomes.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Medical Research Council Manual Muscle Test Sum Score ( MRC-ss)

    Time frame: Up to 28 days

    Test of muscle strength and function, where full strength is defined as a score of 60/60 and ICU-AW as a score of <48/60

  2. Hand held dynamometry (HHD)

    Time frame: Up to 12 weeks

    Assessment of hand grip strength

  3. Chelsea Critical Care Physical Assessment tool (CPAX)

    Time frame: Up to 28 days

    This validated tool reliably grades physical morbidity from complete

    dependence on admission though progressive independence. Scores on ICU discharge may predict recovery trajectory.

  4. ICU Mobility Scale

    Time frame: Up to 28 days

    Best level of function achieved in ICU using an 11-point ordinal scale

  5. Timed up and go

    Time frame: Up to 6 months

    The Timed Up and Go test is a simple test used to assess a person's mobility and requires both static and dynamic balance. It uses the time that a person takes to rise from a chair, walk three meters, turn around, walk back to the chair, and sit down.

  6. Clinical Frailty Score

    Time frame: Up to 6 months

    An 8 point score to classify patients as fit, vulnerable or frail and correlates with outcome in both elderly and younger patients. Pre illness frailty will be assessed by proxy on admission from information gathered from family member /NOK and from patient at the 3 follow-up assessment

  7. Barthel Index for Activities of Daily Living

    Time frame: Up to 6 months

    Barthel ADL index is an ordinal scale used to measure performance in activities of daily living (ADL).

    Each performance item is rated on this scale with a given number of points assigned to each level or ranking. It uses ten variables describing ADL and mobility. A higher number is associated with a greater likelihood of being able to live at home with a degree of independence following discharge from hospital.

  8. Six minute walk test

    Time frame: Up to 6 months

    Widely used to assess functional exercise capacity in patients following an ICU admission

  9. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale - HADS

    Time frame: 6 months

    Measure of anxiety and depression in general medical population of patients. Each item on the questionnaire is scored from 0-3 and this means that a person can score between 0 and 21 for either anxiety or depression.

  10. WHO Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0)

    Time frame: 6 months

    A generic assessment instrument for health and disability

  11. EQ-5D-5L

    Time frame: 6 months

    The descriptive system comprises self-assessment of five dimensions of health: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression.

    The patient is asked to indicate his/her health state by ticking the box next to the most appropriate statement in each of the five dimensions. This decision results in a 1-digit number that expresses the level selected for that dimension. The digits for the five dimensions can be combined into a 5-digit number that describes the patient's health state.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust

Other

Collaborators

  • National Institute for Health Research, United Kingdom

Registry information

Official study title

EMPRESS: A Feasibility Study of Early Mobilisation Programmes in Critical Care

Acronym: EMPRESS

Important dates

Study start
2019
Primary completion
2022
Study completion
2022
First posted
Dec 10, 2018
Registry last updated
Oct 27, 2022

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Related clinical trials

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.