Focused Multipolar Stimulation (FMS) strategy
DeviceAdult cochlear implant recipients receiving different combinations of alternative modes and, sound coding parameters.
NCT Number: NCT05641155
The purpose of this early feasibility study is to explore several facets of hearing performance that may show improvements for alternative modes of stimulation compared to Monopolar (MP stimulation) in cochlear implant recipients. This study will iteratively evaluate different parameter sets that intend to maximize hearing performance benefits within technical requirements. This study is exploratory in nature and will achieve its objectives through ongoing review and adjustment of device parameters and fitting
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Universitair Ziekenhuis Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
Alternative modes of stimulation will be investigated that may improve spectral resolution through reduced cochlear spread of excitation and in turn provide enhanced speech perception and real-world clinical benefits over MP stimulation. The purpose of this study is to balance the clinical improvements of alternative modes of stimulation with technical and usability requirements for power usage. By iteratively evaluating different sets of stimulation and sound coding parameters, this study will determine device settings and fitting techniques. Measures of speech recognition, listening effort, neural responses, electrode placement, battery life, and usability acceptance will be obtained to evaluate clinical benefits
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
a) Bilateral sensorineural hearing loss criteria for clinics in the United States: i) Ear to be implanted:
(1) PTA (500, 1000, 2000, and 4000 Hz) > 30 dB HL (2) Aided word score ≤ 80% b) Bilateral sensorineural hearing loss criteria for clinics in Belgium: i) Both ears:
-
Exclusion criteria
Adult cochlear implant recipients receiving different combinations of alternative modes and, sound coding parameters.
Time frame: 10 weeks
Mean difference across maps using alternative modes and sound coding parameters for the highest and average comfortable loudness level (clinical unit) (C-level).
Time frame: 10 weeks
Mean difference across maps using alternative modes and sound coding parameters for spectral resolution (% correct) (QSMD - Quick spectral modulation detection)
Time frame: 10 weeks
Mean difference across maps using alternative modes and sound coding parameters for phoneme discrimination (% correct) (LIT - Language independent test)
Cochlear
Industry
An Early Feasibility, Prospective, Exploratory Study Evaluating the Performance of Focused Multipolar Stimulation and Sound Coding Enhancements in Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients (SASC).
Acronym: SASC
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05286385
Ear Diseases, Hearing Disorders
Macquarie Park, New South Wales, Australia
View Trial DetailsNCT04230876
Ear Diseases, Hearing Disorders
St Louis, Missouri, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07572357
Ear Diseases, Hearing Disorders
Macquarie Park, New South Wales, Australia
View Trial DetailsNCT07304024
Age Problem, Auditory Diseases, Central
Aurora, Colorado, United States
View Trial Details