Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT06595446

A Feasibility Randomized Trial Evaluating Early vs Late Stent Removal Following Radical Cystectomy and Ileal Conduit Formation for Bladder Cancer

Bladder cancer is the 4th most common cancer in men and 5th most common type of cancer in Canada. Urothelial cancer accounts for approximately 90% of malignancies. At diagnosis, over 75% of cases are classified as non-muscle invasive (NMIBC), and with appropriate treatment, the majority of these patients achieve positive outcomes. The progression rate of NMIBC to Muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) varies between 5-50% at 5 years dependent on histopathological features such as grade, stage, presence of CIS and age (Carcinoma in Situ). The optimal treatment of MIBC (T2-T4N0M0) consists of neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy followed by Radical cystectomy and urinary diversion (RCUD). In the last couple of decades, RCUD has also gained attention for treating patients with high-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. Despite advancements in surgical techniques and the rise of minimally invasive alternatives, complications after surgery remain frequent, with morbidity rates of approximately 50%.

Several uncertainties persist in surgical practice, including the role of perioperative ureteric stenting during RCUD. Perioperative ureteric stenting is intended to minimize urinary leakage from the newly created uretero-enteric anastomosis and to prevent early obstruction caused by anastomotic swelling. However, stenting may increase the risk of urinary tract infections (UTIs) and necessitate additional follow-up for stent removal. Peng et al. conducted the most recent systematic review in 2021, demonstrating that ureteral stents in RCUD were linked to higher rates of anastomotic strictures. Their review did not provide evidence that these stents were more effective than not using stents in preventing post-diversion urinary leakage. The review underscored the scarcity of prospective randomized controlled trials examining the safety and effectiveness of stenting in this context. The sole prospective (non-randomized) study assessing stent dwell / retention time after RCUD demonstrated early stent removal (2 weeks) had decreased 90-day readmissions and UTIs.

Therefore, the investigators aimed to determine the feasibility of conducting a definitive randomized trial to evaluate patients undergoing radical cystectomy and ileal conduit formation to receive either early stent removal (5-7 days) or late stent removal (4-6 weeks).

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Victoria Hospital

London, Ontario, Canada

Location status: Recruiting

Location contact

Kaydee Connors, BsC

CONTACT

519-685-8500 ext. 56366

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adult patients (18 years or older) undergoing radical cystectomy and ileal conduit formation for bladder cancer
  • Able to give informed written consent to participate.

Exclusion criteria

  • Treatment without curative intent (cT4b, salvage or palliative cystectomies);
  • Patients undergoing alternative forms of urinary diversion (e.g. continent cutaneous urinary diversion or orthotopic neobladder formation)
  • Patients previously received abdominal/pelvic radiotherapy
  • Patients with concomitant upper urinary tract cancer

Treatment and study plan

Early Stent removal

Procedure

Ureteral JJ stents removed 5-7 days after radical cystectomy and ileal conduit formation

Late Stent removal

Procedure

Ureteral JJ stents removed 4-6 weeks after radical cystectomy and ileal conduit formation

Primary outcomes

  1. Complication rates

    Time frame: within 30 days:

  2. Feasibility Outcomes

    Time frame: 1 year

    • Recruitment Metrics:
    • Recruitment Rates: Number of participants recruited versus the number of eligible patients.
    • Screen Failures: Number of patients screened but found ineligible.
    • Non-Consenting Rates: Number of eligible patients who decline participation.
    • Protocol Adherence:
    • Randomization Process Success: Rate of successful randomizations without errors.
    • Protocol Violations / Deviations: Incidents where clinical needs required deviation from the protocol.
    • Completion Rate: Proportion of participants who complete the study according to the protocol.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Complication rates

    Time frame: within 90 days

  2. Readmission rates

    Time frame: within 90 days

  3. Complication rates

    Time frame: within 1 year

    The secondary outcomes will also include composite Uretero-enteric anastomosis (UEA) complications after radical cystectomy and ileal conduit formation.

Other outcomes

  1. Length of stay

    Time frame: 90 days

    Length of inpatient hospital stay following surgery

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Kaydee Connors, BSc

CONTACT

[email protected]

519-685-8500 ext. 56366

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Western University, Canada

Other

Registry information

Official study title

A Feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating Early vs Late Stent Removal Following Radical Cystectomy and Ileal Conduit Formation for Bladder Cancer

Acronym: STENT-OPT

Important dates

Study start
2024
Primary completion
2025
Study completion
2026
First posted
Sep 19, 2024
Registry last updated
Apr 4, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.