Prostate biopsy
ProcedureAll patients were required to underwent transperineal prostate biopsy and have corresponding pathological diagnosis results.
NCT Number: NCT06507462
The goal of this observational study is to construct a predictive model for improving the diagnostic accuracy in patients with PI-RADS score of 3. The main aims of this study are:
* Construct a diagnostic model of patients with PI-RADS of score. * Internal and external validation of the model. * Decision curve analysis. The data of participants was collected retrospectively.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
Male
Observational
Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical University, Bengbu, Anhui, China
For patients with a PI-RADS score of 3, the diagnosis of prostate cancer is still use prostate biopsy, but the detection rates of prostate cancer and clinically significant prostate cancer are approximately 30% and 15%. It can be seen that most patients with PI-RADS 3 undergo unnecessary prostate biopsy and bear the risk of complications such as urinary tract infection. This makes most patients with PI-RADS 3 choose to refuse invasive prostate biopsy. Although researchers are committed to exploring biomarkers with high sensitivity and specificity, the application of biomarkers alone often cannot achieve the expected results. At present, the guidelines have recommended the use of diagnostic prediction models to assess patients' prostate cancer risk. Doctors and patients use diagnostic models to assess the risk of prostate cancer before prostate biopsy. For patients with a low probability of cancer, biopsy can be temporarily avoided, which to a certain extent reduces the phenomenon of prostate cancer overdiagnosis. This study plans to work with multiple medical centers to conduct statistical analysis based on existing prostate cancer screening markers combined with patients' clinical data such as prostate volume, prostate-specific antigen density, apparent diffusion coefficient, PI-RADS score and postoperative Gleason score, and then construct a prostate cancer diagnostic model to improve the diagnostic accuracy of prostate cancer for patients with PI-RADS score of 3. This will be of great significance for improving the early diagnosis of patients with PI-RADS 3 and reducing unnecessary prostate puncture biopsies.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
All patients were required to underwent transperineal prostate biopsy and have corresponding pathological diagnosis results.
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 3 months
The clinically significant prostate cancer was defined as Gleason score ≥ 3+4
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 3 months
Evaluate the discrimination and calibration of the model constructed by logistic regression analyses
Anhui Provincial Hospital
Other Gov
Construction and Validation of a Diagnostic Prediction Model for Prostate Cancer in Patients With PI-RADS Score 3: a Multicenter, Retrospective Study
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06575361
Disease, Genital Diseases
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
View Trial DetailsNCT04186845
Disease, Genital Diseases
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05141383
Disease, Genital Diseases
Paris, France
View Trial DetailsNCT04186819
Disease, Genital Diseases
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
View Trial Details