Yale University
New Haven, Connecticut, 06510, United States
NCT Number: NCT05668091
This decentralized trial is a Phase 2, 1:1 randomized, double-blind, superiority, placebo-controlled study in an anticipated 100 non-hospitalized highly symptomatic adult participants with long COVID. It seeks to determine the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of 15 days of Paxlovid (nirmatrelvir/ritonavir), an anti-viral agent, compared with placebo plus ritonavir. The hypothesis is that viral persistence contributes to long COVID in some patients and nirmatrelvir/ritonavir compared with placebo/ritonavir can improve general health status in participants with long COVID. The study will also seek immune signatures associated with treatment response (overseen by Professor Akiko Iwasaki).
The decentralized study does not require site visits, and participants in all 48 states including the District of Columbia, who meet entry criteria can enroll. It is designed to make it convenient to participate. The study drugs will be delivered to the participant's designated address.
Long COVID is also known as post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 (PASC).
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 2
New Haven, Connecticut, 06510, United States
This decentralized Phase 2, 1:1 randomized, double-blind, superiority, placebo-controlled trial in non-hospitalized symptomatic adult participants with long COVID will investigate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of 15 days of treatment with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir compared with placebo/ritonavir. The hypothesis is that 15 days of treatment with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir compared with placebo/ritonavir for the treatment of highly symptomatic, adult participants with long COVID will improve their general health as assessed by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-29 version 2.1 Physical Health Summary Score at Day 28 (2 weeks after the end of the trial drug treatment). This randomized trial is intended to inform future research and will involve an investigation into markers of response.
The primary outcome is the PROMIS-29 Physical Health Summary Score. Secondary outcomes will include the PROMIS subscales and items; the Modified General Symptom Questionnaire (Modified GSQ-30) with PROMIS Cognitive Function v.2.0 - Short Form 6a and supplemental symptoms questionnaire and items; the COVID Core Outcome Measure for Recovery; the EuroQol EQ-5D-5L (USA Version); the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)-Item GP5; the Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGIS), Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC), and symptom assessments and healthcare utilization and death. The trial will also employ immunophenotyping to explore the effects of treatment on immune signatures and immune markers of response. In addition, there will be an evaluation of safety endpoints.
The trial will randomize 100 participants 18 years and older and able to provide legal consent, with long COVID (history of SARS-CoV-2 infection, symptoms consistent with long COVID beginning after the index infection and continuing more than 12 weeks); with a current fair or worse health status and a good or better health status before the index infection and no known other obvious reason for a depressed health status. Exclusion criteria include HIV infection; pregnancy; breastfeeding; renal impairment (eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m2); hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh Class B or C); history of clinically significant hypersensitivity reactions [e.g., toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) or Stevens-Johnson syndrome] to the product; known or suspected debilitating chronic conditions or those associated with an impaired immune system that pre-date the long COVID syndrome.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Demographics
Disease Characteristics
Surveys and Health Records
Usual Source of Care • Have a usual source of medical care with medical record documentation as required above. (The purpose is to have a health care provider who can be notified of their involvement in the trial and can be a source of care for any adverse effects.)
Informed Consent
Exclusion criteria
Medical Conditions
Prior/Concomitant Therapy
Prior/Concurrent Clinical Trial Experience
Diagnostic Assessments
Known history of any of the following abnormalities within the past 6 months or currently present:
Other Exclusions
Two 150 mg tablets taken by mouth every 12 hours.
One 100 mg capsule taken by mouth every 12 hours.
Two tablets containing placebo matching nirmatrelvir taken by mouth every 12 hours.
Other names: sugar pill
Time frame: Day 28
The difference in NIH PROMIS-29 version 2.1 Physical Health Summary Score at Day 28 between nirmatrelvir/ritonavir and placebo/ritonavir treatment estimated with a longitudinal analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) that controls for age, sex, and baseline PROMIS-29 Physical Health Summary Score. PROMIS-29 was selected as a well-validated, non-proprietary general health assessment. PROMIS-29 is a self-report 29-item questionnaire from 7 primary PROMIS domains (depression, physical function, pain interference, fatigue, sleep disturbance, and satisfaction with participation in social roles). PROMIS-29 assessments are transformed into a T-score metric, so that scores have a normal distribution with a population mean T-score of 50 and standard deviation of 10. Higher scores mean better outcomes.
Time frame: Day 28 and at Day 15, and Weeks 6, 10, 14, 18, and 24
Difference in GSQ-30 between nirmatrelvir/ritonavir and placebo/ritonavir groups. The GSQ-30 is a 30-item questionnaire developed to assess symptom burden over a 2-week time period. The GSQ-30 asks: "how much have you been bothered by any of the following?" with 5 options: "not at all," "a little bit," "somewhat," "quite a bit," and "very much" (scored 0-4); total score ranges from 0 to 120. The GSQ-30 reflects physical and neuropsychiatric symptoms. An additional question (not included in the scoring) asks whether any of the 30 GSQ symptoms have impaired work, social, or family functioning, and asks the rank order of severity (up to 7 items) to identify the symptoms of most concern to the individual. Total score ranges from 0 to 120; a higher score means worse outcome. To align with the other trial questionnaires, we will modified the recall period to 1-week.
Time frame: Day 28 and at Day 15, and Weeks 6, 10, 14, 18 and 24
Difference in PROMIS® Cognitive Function v.2.0 - Short Form 6a between nirmatrelvir/ritonavir and placebo/ritonavir groups. The PROMIS® Cognitive Function v.2.0 - Short Form 6a is a 6-item sub-set scale of the PROMIS® Cognitive Function item bank that assesses patient-perceived cognitive deficits.
Time frame: Day 28 and at Day 15, and Weeks 14 and 24
Difference in COVID Core Outcome Measure for Recovery Score between nirmatrelvir/ritonavir and placebo/ritonavir groups. The COVID Core Outcome Measure for Recovery is a single item intended to measure a return to the pre-illness state. Its purpose in this trial is to have a question that directly assesses the participant's perception of their recovery from their SARS-CoV-2 infection. It is scored on a 5-point Likert scale from 0 (completely recovered) to 4 (not recovered at all). Complete recovery means the participant no longer has symptoms related to illness and can do usual daily activities and has returned to their previous state of health and mind (before illness).
Time frame: Day 28 and at Day 15, and Weeks 14 and 24
Difference in EuroQol EQ-5D-5L Utility Score and VAS Score between nirmatrelvir/ritonavir and placebo/ritonavir groups. The EQ-5D-5L is a descriptive system in which respondents are asked to report their current state in 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression), each of which has 5 levels of response (no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, and extreme problems). There is also a visual analogue scale (VAS). In total there are 6 items. The higher the EQ-VAS score, the better the quality of life.
Time frame: Day 28 and Day 15
Difference in FACIT-Item GP5 Score between nirmatrelvir/ritonavir and placebo/ritonavir groups. The single-item FACIT-Item GP5, "I am bothered by side effects of treatment," was included to have a question on the experience with the trial drug and will be prefaced to focus on the trial drug. It is a summary measure of the overall tolerability of treatment, with 5 levels of response: not at all, a little bit, somewhat, quite a bit, and very much. It has a 7-day recall period.
Time frame: Day 28 and at Day 15, and Weeks 6, 10, 14, 18 and 24
Difference in PROMIS-29 Overall and Mental Health Summary Score between nirmatrelvir/ritonavir and placebo/ritonavir groups. The PROMIS-29 v2.0 profile assesses pain intensity using a single 0-10 numeric rating item and 7 health domains (physical function, fatigue, pain interference, depressive symptoms, anxiety, ability to participate in social roles and activities, and sleep disturbance) using 4 items per domain. There is no total score, but each axis forms its own score. Higher scores mean better outcomes.
Time frame: Day 1 through Week 24 (End of Study)
Difference in occurrence of hospitalizations and deaths between nirmatrelvir/ritonavir and placebo/ritonavir groups.
Time frame: up to 6 weeks post starting study drug
Proportion of participants who experience individual SAEs
Time frame: Day 15
The number of SAEs leading to discontinuation in the study
Time frame: Baseline, Day 15, Day 28, Week 6, Week 10, Week 14, Week 24
Based on FDA's recommendations, we will include the Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGIS) and Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) scales. These anchor scales can help interpret a clinically meaningful within-patient score change for the key primary and secondary endpoints. We will include two PGIS and two PGIC scales. The PGIS 1 is a single-item questionnaire that asks respondents: "Overall, how would you rate the severity of your long COVID symptoms over the past week?". Responses are: "none," "mild," "moderate," "severe," and "very severe." The PGIS 2 asks "Overall, how would you rate the impact of your symptoms on your overall health over the past week?". Responses are: "none," "mild," "moderate," "severe," and "very severe." The PGISs will be administered at the same intervals as the primary endpoint (PROMIS-29).
Time frame: Day 15, Day 28, Week 6, Week 10, Week 14, Week 24
The PGIC 1 asks: "Overall, how would you rate the change in your long COVID symptoms since you started the study?". There 7-point scale options: 1) "very much better", 2) "much better", 3) "minimally better", 4) "no change", 5) "minimally worse", 6) "much worse", or 7) "very much worse". Higher scores indicate a change for the worse. The PGIC 2 asks "Overall, how would you rate your overall health since you started the study?". There 7-point scale options: 1) "very much better", 2) "much better", 3) "minimally better", 4) "no change", 5) "minimally worse", 6) "much worse", or 7) "very much worse". Higher scores indicate a change for the worse. The PGICs will be administered at the same intervals as the primary endpoint (PROMIS-29) with the exception of baseline. These instruments have been used extensively in patient-centered research.
Time frame: Baseline, Day 14 and at Day 28
Differences in immune signatures between baseline and nirmatrelvir/ritonavir treatment relative to placebo/ritonavir. Immunophenotyping assays will include flow cytometry, multiplex proteomic analysis, linear peptide profiling, and rapid extracellular antigen profiling, among others.
Harlan M Krumholz
Other
An Interventional Decentralized Phase 2, Randomized, Double-Blind, 2-Arm Study to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of Orally Administered Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir Compared with Placebo/Ritonavir in Participants with Long COVID
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07005921
Behavior, Behavioral Symptoms
Macaíba, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil
View Trial DetailsNCT05758480
COVID-19, Chronic Disease
Angers, France
View Trial DetailsNCT06404112
COVID-19, Chronic Disease
Durham, North Carolina, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06404060
Behavior, COVID-19
Durham, North Carolina, United States
View Trial Details