Shanghai mental health center
Shanghai, China
NCT Number: NCT07715994
This prospective, single-center observational study aims to develop and validate a computer-assisted tool for the objective quantitative assessment of extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS).
The study will enroll 180 participants, including 90 healthy controls and 90 participants with clinically confirmed antipsychotic-induced EPS. The healthy control group will provide reference data on normal movement, while the EPS disease group will provide data on abnormal movements associated with drug-induced parkinsonism, akathisia, or tardive dyskinesia.
Each participant will complete one study visit lasting approximately 60 minutes. During the visit, a trained psychiatrist will assess EPS using the Simpson-Angus Scale (SAS), Barnes Akathisia Rating Scale (BARS), and Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS). Participants will also complete standardized movement tasks while a non-contact computer vision system records and analyzes movement features. The device-based assessment will be repeated after a short rest to evaluate the stability of the measurements.
Data collected earlier in the study will be used to develop and optimize the assessment tool. After the algorithm is finalized and locked, data from subsequently enrolled participants will be used for independent validation. The study will evaluate how closely the tool's results agree with clinician assessments, as well as its ability to identify EPS, produce stable repeated measurements, and operate feasibly and safely in a clinical setting.
This is an observational study. The study does not assign treatment, change participants' medications, or use the investigational tool to make treatment decisions.
Trial opening soon.
Get Notified18 year–80 year
All sexes
Observational
Shanghai, China
This is a prospective, single-center, two-cohort observational study designed to develop and validate an objective quantitative assessment and computer-assisted diagnostic tool for extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS). The study focuses on EPS associated with antipsychotic treatment, including drug-induced parkinsonism, akathisia, and tardive dyskinesia.The observational study model is classified as Other because this is a two-cohort diagnostic accuracy and tool development and validation study with a single study visit, rather than a conventional longitudinal cohort study.
A total of 180 evaluable participants are planned for enrollment. The study includes two cohorts: 90 healthy controls and 90 participants with clinically confirmed antipsychotic-induced EPS. The healthy control cohort will provide reference data for normal physiological movement and will help establish a baseline for distinguishing normal movement variability from abnormal movement features. The EPS disease cohort will provide positive reference data representing clinically confirmed abnormal movement patterns and different levels of symptom severity. The two cohorts are used as reference populations for tool development and validation and are not treatment comparison groups.
Each participant will complete a single study visit lasting approximately 60 minutes. After written informed consent, demographic and relevant clinical information will be collected. For participants in the EPS disease cohort, information on psychiatric history, antipsychotic treatment, time of the most recent medication dose, and use of medications for EPS will also be recorded.
A trained senior psychiatrist will then conduct standardized clinical EPS assessments using the Simpson-Angus Scale (SAS), Barnes Akathisia Rating Scale (BARS), and Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS). The clinical assessment includes observation of posture and spontaneous movement, examination of orofacial movements, standardized upper-limb and hand movements, standing and walking tasks, and assessment of subjective symptoms when applicable. Clinician ratings will be recorded separately from the device assessment, and device operators will not have access to the clinician ratings during data collection.
Participants will subsequently complete a standardized device-based assessment using a non-contact image-based computer vision system. The assessment tasks are designed as a digital representation of movement features examined during routine clinical EPS assessment. Tasks include standardized periods of sitting, upper-limb positioning and movement, orofacial movements such as mouth opening and tongue protrusion, hand and finger movements, standing, walking, and turning. The system extracts facial, hand, and body keypoint information and derives quantitative movement and kinematic features.
After the first device-based assessment, participants will have a short rest of approximately 5 minutes. When physically able and willing to continue, they will complete a second assessment using the same device, instructions, and task sequence. The repeated assessment will be used to evaluate the stability and repeatability of the device-based measurements.
The study uses a two-stage development and validation design. Approximately the first 70% of evaluable participants, including participants from both cohorts, will contribute data to the tool development stage. Device-derived movement features will be aligned with clinician-rated SAS, BARS, and AIMS results to support model training, parameter optimization, and development of objective severity grading. After the predefined development process is completed, the algorithm will be locked and no further model modification will be made for the validation analysis.
Approximately the final 30% of evaluable participants enrolled after algorithm lock will form an independent validation set. The locked system will be evaluated on these previously unseen data. The validation stage will assess agreement between device-based and clinician-rated EPS severity grading, the ability of the tool to distinguish participants with clinically confirmed EPS from healthy controls, the stability of repeated measurements, and the feasibility and safety of the standardized assessment procedure.
This is a non-interventional observational study. Participants are not assigned to treatments or medications by the study protocol. The study does not require discontinuation, dose reduction, dose escalation, or substitution of antipsychotic or anti-EPS medications. Outputs from the investigational system will be used for research purposes and will not be used to make immediate clinical treatment decisions.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
A. Control Group
B. EPS Disease Group
Exclusion criteria
The following exclusion criteria apply to both groups:
Participants will complete a standardized, non-contact, image-based computer-assisted assessment of extrapyramidal symptoms. The assessment consists of predefined sitting, orofacial, hand and finger, upper-limb, standing, walking, and turning tasks. The system processes image data to extract facial, hand, and body keypoints and derive quantitative movement and kinematic features. Each participant will complete the same assessment twice during a single study visit, separated by approximately 5 minutes, to evaluate test-retest reliability. The assessment is conducted for research purposes only. It does not assign or modify treatment, and its outputs will not be used to make immediate clinical treatment decisions.
Time frame: Single study visit, Day 1
The primary outcome is a single aggregated agreement metric defined as the maximum weighted kappa coefficient among three prespecified subtype-specific comparisons. Weighted kappa coefficients with 95% confidence intervals will be calculated separately for: (1) device-side drug-induced parkinsonism severity classification versus Simpson-Angus Scale (SAS)-based classification; (2) device-side akathisia severity classification versus Barnes Akathisia Rating Scale (BARS)-based classification; and (3) device-side tardive dyskinesia severity classification versus Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS)-based classification. The maximum of the three weighted kappa coefficients will be reported as the primary outcome in the independent test set after algorithm locking. The prespecified primary success criterion will be met if at least one of the three subtype-specific weighted kappa coefficients reaches or exceeds the predefined agreement threshold.
Time frame: Two assessments during the single study visit, separated by approximately 5 minutes, Day 1
Participants will complete two identical standardized device-side motion acquisitions during the same study visit. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) will be calculated for continuous motion features generated by the two acquisitions. Weighted kappa will be calculated for predicted classification results to evaluate short-term stability.
Time frame: Single study visit, Day 1
Using the prespecified SAS-, BARS-, and AIMS-based clinical criteria as the reference standard, sensitivity will be calculated as true positives divided by true positives plus false negatives, multiplied by 100, with a 95% confidence interval. Analysis will use the independent test set after algorithm locking.
Time frame: Single study visit, Day 1
Using the prespecified SAS-, BARS-, and AIMS-based clinical criteria as the reference standard, specificity will be calculated as true negatives divided by true negatives plus false positives, multiplied by 100, with a 95% confidence interval. Analysis will use the independent test set after algorithm locking.
Time frame: Single study visit, Day 1
Using the prespecified clinical reference standard, accuracy will be calculated as true positives plus true negatives divided by the total number of evaluated participants, multiplied by 100, with a 95% confidence interval. Analysis will use the independent test set after algorithm locking.
Time frame: Single study visit, Day 1
Positive predictive value will be calculated as true positives divided by true positives plus false positives, multiplied by 100, with a 95% confidence interval. Analysis will use the independent test set after algorithm locking.
Time frame: Single study visit, Day 1
Negative predictive value will be calculated as true negatives divided by true negatives plus false negatives, multiplied by 100, with a 95% confidence interval. Analysis will use the independent test set after algorithm locking.
Time frame: Single study visit, Day 1
A receiver operating characteristic curve will be generated using a continuous output produced by the locked device-side system and the binary clinical reference classification. The area under the curve will be calculated with a 95% confidence interval in the independent test set after algorithm locking. Higher values indicate better discrimination.
Time frame: Throughout the single study visit, approximately 60 minutes, Day 1
The number of participants experiencing at least one adverse event during the study visit will be recorded. Potential events include falls, gait instability, muscle fatigue or soreness, anxiety, fear, agitation, refusal to undergo testing, and transient fluctuation of psychiatric symptoms. Severity, management, outcome, and relationship to study procedures will be summarized descriptively.
Shanghai Mental Health Center
Other
Development of an Objective Quantitative Assessment and Computer-Assisted Diagnostic Tool for Extrapyramidal Symptoms
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT00475306
Aberrant Motor Behavior in Dementia, Behavior
The Bronx, New York, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06731868
Central Nervous System Diseases, Dyskinesia, Drug-Induced
Shanghai, China
View Trial DetailsNCT03891862
Central Nervous System Diseases, Dyskinesia, Drug-Induced
Little Rock, Arkansas, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03698331
Central Nervous System Diseases, Dyskinesia, Drug-Induced
Anaheim, California, United States
View Trial Details