Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01800435

A Comparison Study of Bypassing Agent Therapy With and Without Tranexamic Acid in Haemophilia A Patients With Inhibitor

Activated prothrombin complex concentrate (aPCC) and recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa) are the only two drugs that are available to treat bleeds in haemophilia A patients with high titer inhibitors. However, management of bleeds in these patients can be challenging due to variation in response and lack of standardized methods to monitor the effect. We hypothesized that significant increase in whole blood clot stability could be achieved when tranexamic acid was given concomitantly with bypassing-agents while thrombin generation remains unaffected. In this prospective crossover study the effect of aPCC and rFVIIa with and without TXA on clot stability and thrombin generation capacity (ETP) were studied, using thromboelastography (ROTEM) and thrombin generation assay (TGA), respectively. In addition, the risk of thrombosis and disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) was assessed.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–65 year

Sex eligibility

Male

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 4

Primary location

Oslo University Hospital

Oslo, 0424, Norway

About this study

Patients receive the first day aPCC (75IU/kg) and aPCC in addition to TXA (20mg/kg orally) the second day. After a 14 days washout period they crosse over using rFVIIa (90 µg/kg) otherwise the same experimental setup. Blood sampling is performed at baseline, 15, 30, 60, 120, 180 and 240 minutes post-treatment.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Haemophilia patients with high titer inhibitors or high-responding inhibitors, aged between 18-65 and no history of aspirin or NSAID use within the last 14 days were eligible for the study.

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients with renal failure, liver disease, infected with immune deficiency virus (HIV), platelet count <150x109/L, acquired haemophilia, ongoing bleeding, hypersensitivity to TXA or a history of arterial or venous thrombosis were excluded from the study.

Treatment and study plan

aPCC, aPCC + TXA

Drug

Feiba 75 IU/kg i.v Feiba 75 IU/kg i.v +Cyklokapron 20 mg/kg p.o

Other names: Feiba i.v, Feiba i.v + Cyklokapron

rFVIIa, rFVIIa + TXA

Drug

NovoSeven 90 µg/kg i.v NovoSeven 90 µg/kg i.v + Cyklokapron 20 mg/kg

Other names: NovoSeven 90 µg/kg i.v, NovoSeven 90 µg/kg i.v + Cyklokapron 20 mg/kg

Primary outcomes

  1. Clot stability and thrombin generation capacity following treatment with bypassing agents with and without tranexamic acid.

    Time frame: 2 years

    MCF (maximum clot formation/mm x 100-1), AUC (area under the elasticity curve AUC, mm• 100 s-1) were used as the primary outcome measures for evaluating clot stability and (ETP) the coagulable state.

Secondary outcomes

  1. DIC or thrombosis events associated with different treatment regimens.

    Time frame: 2 years

    DIC parameters such as aPTT, PT/INR, platelet count, fibrinogen and D-dimer with the scoring system proposed by the International Society of Thrombosis and Haemostasis were used to monitor DIC in addition to common clinical signs associated with DIC were records. Symptoms or clinical signs of thrombosis such as dyspnea, chest pain, legg swelling or discomfort/pain were recorded.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Oslo University Hospital

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Whole Blood Clot Stability and Thrombin Generating Capacity Following Treatment With Bypassing Agents (BPA) With and Without and Tranexamic Acid (TXA) in Haemophilia A Patients With inhibitor-an In-vivo Prospective Crossover Study

Acronym: BPATXAS

Important dates

Study start
2011
Primary completion
2012
Study completion
2012
First posted
Feb 27, 2013
Registry last updated
Mar 1, 2013

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.