Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT00158119

A Comparison of Weighted Vest Exercise and Strength Training

The purpose of this study is to evaluate two types of exercise therapy designed to improve muscle power and mobility: weighted vest exercise vs. progressive resistance training.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

65 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 3

Primary location

Spaulding Cambridge Outpatient Center

Cambridge, Massachusetts, 02138, United States

About this study

Muscle power, a separate physical attribute from strength, is an important determinate of physical functioning in the elderly, for example in avoiding impending falls, rising from a chair, and climbing stairs. Muscle power, which declines with aging at a different rate than strength, has been shown in previous studies to improve through power training utilizing specially designed exercise equipment. However, weighted vest exercise could provide an acceptable, low cost, readily accessible alternative.

The hypotheses being tested in this study are: 1) weighted vest exercise will improve lower extremity power when compared to age matched controls in a standardized progressive resistance training program; 2) improvements in lower extremity power enhance functional performance as shown by improved gait velocity, stair climbing, and chair rise time; and 3) weighted vest exercise in impaired older adults will improve self-reported function and disability.

One hundred sixty-four men and women ages 65 and older, with some physical limitation but able to climb stairs independently, will be randomized to one of two 16-week exercise programs. The intervention group will participate in a weighted vest exercise protocol, consisting of chair-based and stair-climbing exercise, while the control group will participate in a standardized progressive resistance training program. Participants in both programs will meet three times per week for 30-60 minutes per session, for a total of 16 weeks, at a research exercise gym, and will be under the direct supervision of research staff.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Community dwelling men and women aged 65 or older
  • Ability to provide informed consent
  • Impairment in physical performance, based on a score between 4 and 10 inclusive on the SPPB (Short Physical Performance Battery), which evaluates standing balance, walking speed, and chair-rise time
  • Score of 24 or greater on the Folstein mini-mental status exam
  • Exhibit independent stair-climbing ability

Exclusion criteria

  • Unstable acute or chronic disease
  • Neuromusculoskeletal impairment interfering with independent stair climbing
  • Abdominal aortic aneurysm
  • Exertional angina
  • History of ventricular arrhythmia
  • Inguinal or abdominal hernia
  • Symptomatic valvular heart disease

Treatment and study plan

InVEST (Increased Velocity Exercise Specific to Task)

Behavioral

Primary outcomes

  1. Leg power

  2. leg strength

  3. mobility

  4. endurance

  5. balance measured at baseline, 8 weeks, and 16 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Disability

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

National Institute on Aging (NIA)

Nih

Collaborators

  • Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital

Registry information

Official study title

Ameliorating Disability Through Power Training

Important dates

Study start
2001
Primary completion
2007
Study completion
2007
First posted
Sep 12, 2005
Registry last updated
Jul 26, 2010

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.