Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Not Yet Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07010640

A Comparison of Video Versus Written Instructions for Early Motion Flexors Rehabilitation

The research objective is to evaluate the efficacy of video instructions compared to written or verbal instructions for early motion rehabilitation following hand flexor repair. The primary research question addresses whether video instructions improve compliance with early motion rehabilitation post-surgery compared to traditional methods. The hypothesis is that patients who receive video instructions are more likely to adhere to their rehabilitation regimen than those who receive verbal or written instructions.

Not Yet Recruiting

Trial opening soon.

Get Notified

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Orthopaedic Surgery Clinic at ASEM, San Juan, PR, Puerto Rico

Loading trial locations.

About this study

Flexor tendon injuries are prevalent, particularly among the working-age population, leading to significant disability and financial burden, with annual costs ranging from $240 to $409 million in the United States. Effective rehabilitation is crucial to prevent complications like stiffness and adhesions. Advances in surgical techniques, such as multi-strand core sutures, have enabled early active rehabilitation. Previous studies indicate the benefits of video-assisted therapy and education in various medical contexts, suggesting that video instructions could similarly enhance compliance and outcomes in hand flexor rehabilitation. The study aims to assess the efficacy of video instructions versus written or verbal instructions for early motion rehabilitation following hand flexor repair.

The study consists of a single-center single-blinded randomized control trial comparing the communication methods of instructions for early motion rehabilitation following hand flexor repairs. All procedures will be performed under Wide-Awake Local Anesthesia No Tourniquet (WALANT). The sample size will consist of 60 participants. The subjects will be randomly assigned (1:1 randomization) to one of two groups; the experimental group will receive video instructions, while the control group written and verbal instructions. Both groups will be surgically managed by two board-certified orthopaedic hand surgeons (i.e., Christian Foy, MD & Eric Astacio, MD) at a supra-tertiary local hospital (i.e., Oncologic Hospital) under the same operative approach (i.e., six-strand flexor repair). All the subjects will receive the standard of care including a dorsal blocking splint and follow-up visits in hand clinic.

Data collection methods include: surveys, questionnaires (i.e., three - patient satisfaction, pain levels, and self-efficacy), clinical assessments (i.e., ROM, grip strength and complication rates), and communication with the therapist to assess exercise adherence and frequency.

The statistical analysis plan for this study involves summarizing the baseline characteristics of the study population and primary/secondary outcomes using descriptive statistics. Chi-square will be used to compare bivariate categorical variables while t-test will be used to analyze continuous non-parametric variables. A multivariate analysis will be used to control for potential confounder and assess the independent effect of the instruction method on outcomes. A 95% confidence interval with an alpha of 0.05 will be considered statistically significant. Microsoft Excel and STATA software will be used for statistical analysis.

A waiver from the IRB will be requested to gain authorization for the release of health information. All patient records will be kept under use for the duration of the study. The estimated duration of this study is 1 year.

To protect patient confidentiality, data will be stored in an encrypted database in the orthopedic surgery department at the University of Puerto Rico (UPR) Medical Sciences Campus. Only study personnel will have access to the room and computer where digital files will be stored. The information will be coded with identification numbers, and the data will be stored using only these numbers. The information that will be obtained from this study will be used for the purpose specified in the protocol, and the identity of the patients will not be traced after coding. The study will be approved by the proposed research performance site Institutional Review Board (IRB) prior to the initiation of the study. No subjects will be identified by name, social security number, or any other HIPAA identifier in any reports. Any incident regarding information security and/or privacy will be reported in accordance with University Hospital/Medical Sciences Campus policy and procedures in place for reporting incidents, i.e. theft or loss of data or storage media, unauthorized access of sensitive data or storage devices or non-compliance with security controls.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

Patients 18 years old or older Isolated flexor injuries Procedures performed under WALANT technique Providing written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Patients younger than 18 years old Patients with other injuries Procedures performed under any anesthesia other than WALANT Mental disability History of psychiatric disorders

Treatment and study plan

Video Instrctions

Other

Video instructions of rehabilitation techniques and movements to help with adherence and compliance to treatment.

Primary outcomes

  1. Functional outcomes

    Time frame: The measurement is assessed at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, and 3 months.

    Range of motion (i.e., using a goniometer)

  2. Patient-reported outcomes

    Time frame: The measurement is assessed at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, and 3 months.

    Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Measuring distance from 1-100 millimeters. Higher scores indicate pain, whilst lower scores indicate less or no pain.

  3. Compliance with Rehabilitation Protocol

    Time frame: The measurement is assessed at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, and 3 months.

    Frequency of the early motion exercises (i.e., track how often the patients perform their rehabilitation exercises)

  4. Functional Outcome

    Time frame: The measurement is assessed at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, and 3 months.

    Grip strength (i.e., using a dynamometer)

  5. Patient Reported Outcomes

    Time frame: The measurement is assessed at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, and 3 months.

    Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) A ten point scale, with 0 representing no pain and 10 representing the worst possible pain.

  6. Patient Reported Outcomes

    Time frame: The measurement is assessed at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, and 3 months.

    Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulders and Hand (DASH) A self report questionnaire, scored from 0-100. Higher scores indicate a more severe disability, lower scores indicate little or no disability.

  7. Patient Reported Outcomes

    Time frame: The measurement is assessed at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, and 3 months.

    Patient Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) Patient rate their pain and disabilities using wrist over the last week, on a score from 0-10. Higher scores indicate a higher degree of pain and disability.

  8. Patient Reported Outcomes

    Time frame: The measurement is assessed at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, and 3 months.

    Satisfaction with instruction methods: utilize a standardized questionnaire to gauge patient satisfaction with the instruction method (i.e., the system usability scale or a custom satisfaction survey)

  9. Compliance with Rehabilitation Protocol

    Time frame: The measurement is assessed at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, and 3 months.

    Adherence to physical therapy (i.e., via self-reports or therapist assessments)

  10. Compliance with Rehabilitation Protocol

    Time frame: The measurement is assessed at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, and 3 months.

    Duration of the early motion exercises (i.e., track for how long the patients perform their rehabilitation exercises)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Clinical outcomes

    Time frame: 3 months after surgery

    Complication rates: track the incidence of adhesions, re-ruptures, and infections.

  2. Rehabilitation efficiency

    Time frame: 3 months after surgery

    Number of follow-up visits: compare the number of follow-up visits required for each group.

  3. Cognitive outcome

    Time frame: 3 months after surgery

    Instruction comprehension: assess the understanding of the instructions through a quiz or verbal feedback.

  4. Clinical Outcomes

    Time frame: 3 months after surgery

    Time to return to work: measure the time taken for patients to return to their usual activities or work.

  5. Cognitive Outcome

    Time frame: 3 months after surgery

    Self-efficacy: use the general Self-Efficacy Scale to measure the patient's confidence in performing their rehabilitation exercises.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Jose I Acosta, M.D.

CONTACT

[email protected]

787-379-4119

Jose Rdoríguez, M.D.

CONTACT

[email protected]

787-447-9319

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of Puerto Rico

Other

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2025
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2026
First posted
Jun 8, 2025
Registry last updated
Jun 8, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.