Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre
Toronto, Ontario, M4Y 1H1, Canada
NCT Number: NCT03121976
The purpose of this study is to determine which technique for catheter placement in continuous femoral nerve block (FNB) is most successful - guidance with (1) ultrasound or (2) nerve stimulation and ultrasound. Sensory and motor assessment scores will be obtained post-FNB. Patient controlled analgesia and opiate consumption is also recorded along with pain scores for the first 48 hour post-FNB.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–75 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Toronto, Ontario, M4Y 1H1, Canada
Continuous femoral nerve block (cFNB) is a widely used regional anesthetic technique for many lower limb operations, such as total knee arthroplasty (TKA), anterior cruciate ligament repair, tibial osteotomy and patellar surgery. It provides superior pain relief, faster ambulation, shorter hospital stays and less risk of side effects in comparison to patient controlled analgesia (PCA), local anesthetic wound infiltration, or single shot femoral nerve block (FNB).
Stimulating catheters were introduced in 1999 to provide an objective end point to guide continuous nerve block catheter position by maintaining the desired evoked muscle response with nerve stimulation (NS). The main advantages of stimulating catheters are faster onset of sensory and motor block and reduction of local anesthetic drugs consumption. In recent years the precise insertion of continuous catheters has improved especially with the introduction of ultrasound (US)-guided imaging to regional anesthesia practice and advances in scanning techniques. That led to a call to reduce cost by switching to non-stimulating catheters. However, most studies comparing both catheters lacked anesthetic technique standardization and adequate sample size.
In this prospective randomized controlled trial, we compared postoperative analgesic efficacy and opioids consumption in patients having cFNB insertion using US alone and that of US combined with NS.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Femoral catheter inserted using ultrasound only
Femoral catheter inserted using ultrasound and nerve stimulation
Time frame: 24 hours post-block insertion
Pain score assessed 24 hours post-block insertion using numeric pain scale from 0-10
Time frame: At the time of block procedure
Time required to perform the block procedure
Time frame: 30 min post-block insertion
Sensory block evaluation examined the sensation over the skin of the thigh
Time frame: 30 min post-block insertion
Motor block evaluation examined quadriceps muscle strength by grading the ability or inability to extend the leg of the limb to be operated on against gravity after the hip is passively flexed at 45°
Time frame: 24 hours post-block
Total amount of hydromorphone consumed within 24 hours post-block
Time frame: 48 hours post-block
Total amount of hydromorphone consumed within 48 hours post-block
Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre
Other
Comparison of Continuous Femoral Nerve Block Using Ultrasound Versus Ultrasound and Nerve Stimulation Using Stimulating Catheter in Patients Undergoing Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06889870
Agnosia, Anesthesia
Itabira, Minas Gerais, Brazil
View Trial DetailsNCT06326983
Anesthesia, Confusion
Waltham, Massachusetts, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06044740
Amnesia, Anesthesia
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05998564
Anesthesia, Neurologic Manifestations
Nijmegen, Gelderland, Netherlands
View Trial Details