Placebo
OtherThe usual intraoperative and postoperative pain control; NO TAP block performed
NCT Number: NCT02538679
Postoperative pain can pose significant challenges in the postoperative recovery of patients undergoing major colorectal surgery. Traditionally, opioids have played an important role in treating postoperative pain. It is well established that opioids are highly effective in relieving pain; however opioids are associated with numerous side effects that include nausea, vomiting, constipation, ileus, bladder dysfunction, respiratory depression, pruritus, drowsiness, sedation, and allergic reaction. These opioid side effects, which range in severity, can significantly interfere with discharge home following colorectal surgery. Significant interest exists in the use of local anesthetic based regional anesthesia techniques as a means to extend the analgesic window for patients undergoing colorectal surgery. Specifically, the use of the transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block as an adjunct in postoperative pain control has been widely reported in the anesthesia and colorectal surgery literature. Historically, the block was performed in a blind fashion with relative success and presently the block is typically performed either with ultrasound guidance or laparoscopic visualization. While TAP block has shown to be effective in post-operative pain control, the techniques used to place the block have not formally been compared.
The investigators are purposing a prospective, patient-blinded, randomized study of patients undergoing major colorectal surgery to compare TAP block under ultrasound guidance versus laparoscopic visualization versus no TAP block. The investigators hypothesize that laparoscopic-guided TAP block is non-inferior to ultrasound-guided TAP block with respect to perioperative pain control and either technique is superior to no TAP. In addition the investigators will measure procedural time, any adverse events related to the block, overall postoperative analgesic requirement, analgesic duration, postoperative pain scores, length of postoperative hospital stay, incidence of postoperative ileus, and overall patient satisfaction between the three groups.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–90 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
The proposed study is a patient-blinded, prospective randomized study to compare ultrasound-guided block of the TAP versus laparoscopic-guided TAP block versus no TAP block in patients undergoing major colorectal surgery. The primary outcome measure is analgesic requirement in morphine equivalents in the first 24 hours after surgery. Secondary outcome measures include overall postoperative analgesic requirement, postoperative pain scores, length of postoperative hospital stay, any adverse events related to TAP block, overall perioperative complications in the 30-day postoperative period and overall patient satisfaction after major colorectal surgery.
All groups will receive general anesthesia as the primary mode of anesthesia. Patients randomized to one of two treatment arms will also undergo either ultrasound-guided or laparoscopic-guided TAP block in the operating room at the conclusion of the procedure. Patients randomized to no TAP will not have a TAP block performed but will receive all routine intraoperative and postoperative analgesia as deemed appropriate by the anesthesia and primary surgical team. A standardized preoperative non-opioid pain regimen will be utilized. In the recovery room, short acting opioids for breakthrough pain will be available. Opioids will also be administered for rescue if need be. All patients will receive postoperative intravenous narcotics via patient controlled analgesia (PCA) device.
STUDY METHODS
I. Recruitment
II. In the preoperative holding area:
Group 1 n=100 Ultrasound guided TAP Block Group 2 n=100 Laparoscopic guided TAP Block Group 3 n=40 No TAP
III. During the intraoperative period
IV. PACU
o Requirements for "rescue" analgesic medication will be recorded before discharge.
V. Following completion of surgery (post-operative):
VI. Patient evaluation during hospital admission:
Pain evaluation recorded by nursing staff as per standard CSMC guidelines:
Patient satisfaction with analgesia will be assessed at the time of hospital discharge or within 30 days postoperatively by telephone using a patient satisfaction survey.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
The usual intraoperative and postoperative pain control; NO TAP block performed
Ultrasound guided bupivacaine 0.25% with epinephrine 1:400k will be injected to the transversus abdominis plane.
Laparoscopic guided bupivacaine 0.25% with epinephrine 1:400k will be injected to the transversus abdominis plane.
Time frame: 24 hours
Compare ultrasound-guided block of the transversus abdominis plane (TAP) vs laparoscopic-guided TAP block, versus no TAP block on opioid consumption in the first 24 hours. Patients hospital chart was queried for use of any intravenous opioid in the first 24 hours after surgery including fentanyl or hydromorphone and conversion to morphine per standard opioid dose conversion. Total morphine equivalents then summed for the 24 hour postoperative period and compared between groups.
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Other
A Comparison of Ultrasound Guided Transversus Abdominis Plane Nerve Block Technique Versus Laparoscopic Transversus Abdominis Plane Nerve Block Technique Versus No Block on Postoperative Opioid Consumption After Major Colorectal Surgery
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04060303
Colitis, Colitis, Ulcerative
Chicago, Illinois, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06031038
Colitis, Colitis, Ulcerative
Valencia, Spain
View Trial DetailsNCT01369355
Colitis, Colonic Diseases
Tucson, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03338894
Colitis, Colitis, Ulcerative
Morristown, New Jersey, United States
View Trial Details