Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre
Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3H 1V7, Canada
NCT Number: NCT00253838
This study compares two different hip stem components. Both hip stems used in this study allow the femur bone to attach and grow into them for stability. The main difference between the two stems is that one of the stems, the Solution® Stem, is made from Cobalt Chrome, a type of metal, and does not have a hydroxylapatite (HA) coating, while the second stem included in the study, the Restoration hip stem, is made from titanium alloy, a different type of metal that has a roughened surface and allows for a hydroxylapatite (HA) coating to be applied to the entire length of the stem. The HA coating is a thin calcium phosphate layer on the stem to encourage the bone to grow into it. We are trying to see if there is any difference in the initial bony ingrowth between the two stems and to compare the results in patients over the first two years after the surgery and then again at the five-year period.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me21 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3H 1V7, Canada
Revision total hip arthroplasty is becoming increasingly common due to the large number of primary total hip arthroplasties being performed annually. Failure of these arthroplasties has led to an increasing number of patients requiring revision arthroplasty. Various methods have been used to reconstruct the hip during a revision procedure. These have generally consisted of a cemented or uncemented femoral stem. It is now generally accepted that uncemented femoral stems have improved results over cemented stems, especially in those cases with compromised bone stock. There are two main alloys used for the femoral revision component, that is cobalt chrome and titanium. There may be certain advantages to the use of titanium, in particular, a reduction in future bone loss caused by stress shielding. Stress shielding is commonly seen with cobalt chrome implants. In order to assess this and the overall survival of these two different implants a randomized clinical trial is proposed.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
The Restoration hip stem, is made from titanium alloy, a different type of metal that has a roughened surfacing and allows for a hydroxylapatite (HA) coating to be applied to the entire length of the stem.
Other names: non applicable
The Solution stem is made from Cobalt Chrome, a type of metal, and does not have a hydroxylapatite (HA) coating.
Other names: non applicable
Time frame: 24 months
Safety of surgical implant will be assessed by reviewing revision rates and complication rates post surgery
Time frame: pre-op, 6, 12, 24, 60 months
Patient outcome measures will be assessed using the SF-12 and WOMAC questionnaires.
Time frame: 24 months
The Harris Hip Score will be used to evaluate the effectiveness of the surgical implant
Ottawa Hospital Research Institute
Other
A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing a Titanium to a Cobalt Chrome Femoral Stem in Revision Hip Arthroplasty: A Pilot Study
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07445009
Confusion, Delirium
Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT06009432
Hip Arthroplasty
Muğla, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT05807828
Arthritis, Educational Problems
Thessaloniki, Greece
View Trial DetailsNCT06989554
Ankle Fractures, Ankle Injuries
Varese, Italy
View Trial Details