Segeberger Kliniken GmbH / Herzzentrum
Bad Segeberg, Schleswig-Holstein, 23795, Germany
NCT Number: NCT01645202
A randomized controlled multicenter study comparing the acute hemodynamic performance of the Edwards Sapien XT and the Medtronic CoreValve transcatheter heart valves in high risk patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me75 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Bad Segeberg, Schleswig-Holstein, 23795, Germany
Study design: randomized open-label multicenter
Primary endpoint:
'Device success' as recently defined by VARC which is a 'technical' composite endpoint including:
Secondary endpoints:
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Comparison of different types of valves
Other names: Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR)
Time frame: Immediately after the procedure
Device success is a 'technical' composite endpoint including successful vascular access, delivery and deployment of the device and successful retrieval of the delivery system, correct position of the device in the proper anatomical location, intended performance of the prosthetic heart valve (aortic valve area > 1.2 cm2 and mean aortic valve gradient < 20 mmHg or peak velocity < 3 m/s, without moderate or severe prosthetic valve AR) and only one valve implanted in the proper anatomical location.
Time frame: 30 days
Combined endpoint defined by VARC as: 1) All cause mortality, 2) Major stroke, 3) Life threatening (or disabling) bleeding, 4) Acute kidney injury-Stage 3 (including renal replacement therapy), 5) Periprocedural myocardial infarction, 6) Major vascular complications and 7) Repeat procedure for valve-related dysfunction (surgical or interventional therapy).
Time frame: 1 year
A composite endpoint defined by VARC as: 1) All cause mortality between 30 days and one year, 2) Failure of current therapy for aortic stenosis, requiring hospitalization for symptoms of valve-related or cardiac decompensation and 3) Prosthetic heart valve dysfunction (aortic valve area < 1.2 cm2 and mean aortic valve gradient > 20 mmHg or peak velocity > 3 m/s or moderate or severe prosthetic valve AR)
Segeberger Kliniken GmbH
Other
A Randomized Comparison of Transcatheter Heart Valves in High Risk Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis: Medtronic CoreValve Versus Edwards SAPIEN XT (The CHOICE Trial)
Acronym: CHOICE
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT01757665
Aortic Stenosis, Aortic Valve Disease
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05171712
Aortic Insufficiency, Aortic Stenosis
Chennai, India
View Trial DetailsNCT03466918
Aortic Regurgitation, Aortic Stenosis
Beijing, China
View Trial DetailsNCT05002088
Aortic Insufficiency, Aortic Stenosis
Adelaide, Australia
View Trial Details