Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01645202

A Comparison of Transcatheter Heart Valves in High Risk Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis: The CHOICE Trial

A randomized controlled multicenter study comparing the acute hemodynamic performance of the Edwards Sapien XT and the Medtronic CoreValve transcatheter heart valves in high risk patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

75 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Segeberger Kliniken GmbH / Herzzentrum

Bad Segeberg, Schleswig-Holstein, 23795, Germany

About this study

Study design: randomized open-label multicenter

Primary endpoint:

'Device success' as recently defined by VARC which is a 'technical' composite endpoint including:

  • Successful vascular access, delivery and deployment of the device and successful retrieval of the delivery system,
  • Correct position of the device in the proper anatomical location,
  • Intended performance of the prosthetic heart valve (aortic valve area > 1.2 cm2 and mean aortic valve gradient < 20 mmHg or peak velocity < 3 m/s, without moderate or severe prosthetic valve AR) and
  • Only one valve implanted in the proper anatomical location.

Secondary endpoints:

  • 30-day-combined safety endpoint which is a combined endpoint defined by VARC as:
  • All cause mortality,
  • Major stroke,
  • Life threatening (or disabling) bleeding,
  • Acute kidney injury-Stage 3 (including renal replacement therapy),
  • Periprocedural myocardial infarction,
  • Major vascular complications and
  • Repeat procedure for valve-related dysfunction (surgical or interventional therapy). *
  • Combined efficacy endpoint at 1 year which is a composite endpoint defined by VARC as:
  • All cause mortality between 30 days and one year,
  • Failure of current therapy for aortic stenosis, requiring hospitalization for symptoms of valve-related or cardiac decompensation and
  • Prosthetic heart valve dysfunction (aortic valve area < 1.2 cm2 and mean aortic valve gradient > 20 mmHg or peak velocity > 3 m/s or moderate or severe prosthetic valve AR). *
  • Cardiovascular mortality as defined by VARC at 1 month, 6 and 12 months. *
  • Major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE): myocardial infarction, cardiac or vascular surgery and stroke at 30 days, 6 & 12 months.
  • Rehospitalization for heart failure at 12 months
  • Quality of life (assessed with the Euro5Qual-questionnaire) at 12 months
  • NYHA-class improvement at 30 days, 6 and 12 months
  • Vascular complication as defined by VARC at 30 days.
  • Post-procedural pacemaker implantation at 1 month
  • Major or minor Bleeding at 30 days as defined be VARC.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Severe aortic valve stenosis defined as aortic valve area (AVA) ≤ 1cm2 or 0.6 cm2/m2
  • Presence of clinical symptoms defined as New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class ≥ 2
  • Age > 75 years and/or Logistic EuroSCORE ≥ 20% and/or STS risk score ≥ 10% and/or contraindication to conventional surgical aortic valve replacement (porcelain aorta, previous chest radiation, chest deformation)
  • Native aortic valve annulus measuring 20-25 mm
  • Patients must be suitable for a transfemoral vascular access
  • The patient signing a written informed consent prior to intervention

Exclusion criteria

  • Life expectancy < 12 months due to co-morbid conditions
  • Native aortic valve annulus < 20 mm and > 25 mm (this could be amended if further valve sizes for the transfemoral approach become available for both prostheses during the study period)
  • Pre-existing aortic bioprosthesis
  • Cardiogenic shock or hemodynamic instability
  • History of, or active endocarditis
  • Contraindications for a transfemoral access
  • Active peptic ulcer or upper gastro-intestinal bleeding within the prior 3 months.
  • Hypersensitivity or contraindication to aspirin, heparin or clopidogrel
  • Active infection requiring antibiotic treatment
  • An elective surgical procedure is planned that would necessitate interruption of thienopyridines during the first 3 months post-enrolment
  • Patients actively participating in another drug or device investigational study and have not yet completed the primary endpoint follow-up period

Treatment and study plan

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI)

Procedure

Comparison of different types of valves

Other names: Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR)

Primary outcomes

  1. 'Device success' as recently defined by the Valve Academic Research Consortium

    Time frame: Immediately after the procedure

    Device success is a 'technical' composite endpoint including successful vascular access, delivery and deployment of the device and successful retrieval of the delivery system, correct position of the device in the proper anatomical location, intended performance of the prosthetic heart valve (aortic valve area > 1.2 cm2 and mean aortic valve gradient < 20 mmHg or peak velocity < 3 m/s, without moderate or severe prosthetic valve AR) and only one valve implanted in the proper anatomical location.

Secondary outcomes

  1. VARC-defined combined safety endpoint

    Time frame: 30 days

    Combined endpoint defined by VARC as: 1) All cause mortality, 2) Major stroke, 3) Life threatening (or disabling) bleeding, 4) Acute kidney injury-Stage 3 (including renal replacement therapy), 5) Periprocedural myocardial infarction, 6) Major vascular complications and 7) Repeat procedure for valve-related dysfunction (surgical or interventional therapy).

  2. VARC-defined combined efficacy endpoint

    Time frame: 1 year

    A composite endpoint defined by VARC as: 1) All cause mortality between 30 days and one year, 2) Failure of current therapy for aortic stenosis, requiring hospitalization for symptoms of valve-related or cardiac decompensation and 3) Prosthetic heart valve dysfunction (aortic valve area < 1.2 cm2 and mean aortic valve gradient > 20 mmHg or peak velocity > 3 m/s or moderate or severe prosthetic valve AR)

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Segeberger Kliniken GmbH

Other

Registry information

Official study title

A Randomized Comparison of Transcatheter Heart Valves in High Risk Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis: Medtronic CoreValve Versus Edwards SAPIEN XT (The CHOICE Trial)

Acronym: CHOICE

Important dates

Study start
2012
Primary completion
2013
Study completion
2018
First posted
Jul 20, 2012
Registry last updated
Jul 26, 2019

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.