Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01008865

A Comparison of the Studer Pouch Versus the T-Pouch Orthotopic Neobladder Urinary Diversion in Bladder Cancer Patients

This is a prospective, randomized study of two types of continent ileal neobladder construction in patients undergoing cystectomy for primary bladder cancer. Patients will be randomly assigned to have either a T-pouch or a Studer pouch constructed at the time of their surgery. They will be followed long-term to determine the relative advantages and disadvantages of the two types of diversion. The investigators' hypothesis is that the inclusion of an antireflux mechanism in the T-pouch will result in significantly fewer episodes of symptomatic urinary tract infection, and will have a lower incidence of upper tract dilation and loss of renal function over the long term.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center

Los Angeles, California, 90033, United States

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • All patients undergoing radical cystectomy for bladder cancer who are considered candidates for a neobladder reconstruction are eligible for enrollment.
  • Diagnosed with primary bladder cancer (any histology).
  • Scheduled to undergo a radical cystectomy (cystoprostatectomy in men and anterior exenteration in women).
  • Felt by the treating physician to be a candidate for an orthotopic neobladder urinary diversion.
  • Be competent and willing to sign the informed consent.
  • Patients may have received previous radiation therapy or intravesical or systemic chemotherapy. Patients with documented metastatic disease are not excluded as long as they are felt to be candidates for a continent neobladder urinary diversion.

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients undergoing radical cystectomy for any malignancy other than primary bladder cancer (for example prostate cancer or colon cancer invading the bladder,or a gynecologic malignancy), or non-malignant disease (such as a neurogenic bladder or radiation cystitis).
  • Unwilling or unable to sign the informed consent.
  • Not eligible for an orthotopic neobladder reconstruction.
  • A history of other malignancy (except for stage I cancer treated with curative intent without evidence of recurrence, clinically localized prostate cancer either untreated or treated with prostatectomy or radiation therapy or hormone therapy,or non-melanoma skin cancer) within the previous 5 years.

Treatment and study plan

Studer Pouch orthotopic urinary diversion

Procedure

T-Pouch orthotopic urinary diversion

Procedure

Primary outcomes

  1. The primary endpoint is the long-term outcome (> 3 years) as it pertains to renal function, anatomy of the upper urinary tracts, and the requirement for medical or surgical intervention (ie for symptomatic urinary tract infections).

    Time frame: 3 years after date of last patient enrolled

Secondary outcomes

  1. A secondary endpoint is the length of surgery and the incidence of early postoperative complications (<30 days from surgery) believed to be related to the type of urinary diversion.

    Time frame: Within 30 days after surgery

  2. An additional secondary endpoint is cancer recurrence and overall survival, which will be recorded in each patient.

    Time frame: Yearly for the first 5 years, then every 2 years

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of Southern California

Other

Registry information

Official study title

A Randomized Comparison of the Studer Pouch vs. the T-Pouch Orthotopic Neobladder Urinary Diversion in Bladder Cancer Patients

Important dates

Study start
2002
Primary completion
2018
Study completion
2018
First posted
Nov 6, 2009
Registry last updated
Jan 25, 2019

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.