State Research Institute of Circulation Pathology
Novosibirsk, 630055, Russia
NCT Number: NCT01709682
The hypothesis of this study was that early re-ablation (test) was superior to AAD therapy (control) in patients with previous failed PVI ablation for paroxysmal AF.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–65 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 2
Novosibirsk, 630055, Russia
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
propafenone, flecainide, and/or sotalol as first-line drugs in patients without structural heart disease or amiodarone as a single drug or in combination in patients with structural heart disease or in case of first-line drug failure
Reisolation of the PVs was performed by identifying the breakthrough site on the mapping catheter (NaviStar ThermoCool, Biosense-Webster Inc., Diamond Bar, CA). RF energy was delivered at 43°C, 35 W, 0.5 cm away from the PV ostia at the anterior wall, and was reduced to 43°C, 30 W, 1 cm away from the PV ostia at the posterior wall, with a saline irrigation rate of 17 mL/min. Each lesion was ablated continuously until the local potential amplitude decreased by >80% or RF energy deliveries exceeded 40 s. The endpoint of ablation was complete PVI; this was confirmed when Lasso catheter mapping showed the disappearance of all PV potentials or the dissociation of PV potentials from LA activity.
The Reveal XT was implanted in the parasternal area of the chest. The requirement for defining the exact final position was an R-wave amplitude ≥0.4 mV assessed through the Vector Check.
Patients were provided with the Patient Assistant, a tool that allows each patient to store the ECG through the implanted device during symptoms; data were collected in order to analyze heart rhythm during symptomatic events.
Time frame: 3 year
Time frame: 3 years
Time frame: 3 years
Time frame: 3 years
AF burden by ILR monitoring
Time frame: 3 years
Meshalkin Research Institute of Pathology of Circulation
Network
Progression of Atrial Fibrillation After a Failed Initial Ablation Procedure in Patients With Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: A Randomized Comparison of the Drug Therapy Versus Re-Ablation
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06014996
Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Atrial Fibrillation
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
View Trial DetailsNCT05072964
Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Atrial Fibrillation
Bruges, Belgium
View Trial DetailsNCT03882021
Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Atrial Fibrillation
Linz, UPR AUS, Austria
View Trial DetailsNCT05295056
Afib, Arrhythmia Atrial
St Louis, Missouri, United States
View Trial Details