Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03375190

A Comparison of Peripheral Nerve Catheter Securement Techniques at the Insertion Site in Healthy Volunteers

Continuous peripheral nerve block catheters are used for prolonged analgesia, but are often associated with complications such as catheter failure or dislodgement. This is a single center, prospective study to compare peripheral nerve catheter securement techniques at the insertion site in healthy volunteers.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–85 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Duke University Medical Center

Durham, North Carolina, 27710, United States

About this study

This study will involve the placement of subcutaneous peripheral nerve catheters in healthy volunteers utilizing 6 different securement techniques. The primary outcome is the force required to dislodge the peripheral nerve catheter by 1 centimeter as measured by a dynamometer in Newtons. The secondary endpoint will be the force required to disrupt the catheter dressing.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 18-85 years
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status I-II
  • BMI 18-30 kg/m2

Exclusion criteria

  • Inability to cooperate with or understand protocol
  • Inability to understand or speak English
  • Allergy to adhesive or tape
  • Local infection in lower extremities
  • Neurologic deficit or disorder
  • Anticoagulation

Treatment and study plan

dressing

Other

Transparent film dressing (TegadermTM CHG Chlorhexidine Gluconate IV Securement Dressing, 3M Health Care, St. Paul, MN, USA) alone

Dressing + adhesive

Other

Transparent film dressing + topical skin adhesive (SwiftSetTM Topical Skin Adhesive, CovidienTM Devon, UK) at insertion site

Experimental: Dressing + adhesive + strips (parallel)

Other

Transparent film dressing + topical skin adhesive + reinforced skin closure strips (Steri-StripTM, 3M Health Care, St. Paul, MN, USA) placed parallel to long axis of catheter

Experimental: Dressing + adhesive + strips (perpend)

Other

Transparent film dressing + topical skin adhesive + reinforced skin closure strips (Steri-StripTM, 3M Health Care, St. Paul, MN, USA) placed perpendicular to long axis of catheter

Experimental: Dressing + adhesive + strips + benzoin

Other

Transparent film dressing + topical skin adhesive + skin closure strips + topical benzoin (Compound Tincture of Benzoin USP 10%, Professional Disposables International, Inc., Orangeburg, NY, USA) spread in a 12 centimeter by 14 centimeter area around the insertion site

Experimental: Dressing + adhesive + strips + spray

Other

Transparent film dressing + topical skin adhesive + skin closure strips + medical adhesive spray (AdaptTM Medical Adhesive, Hollister Incorporated, Libertyville, IL, USA) in a 12 centimeter by 14 centimeter area around the insertion site

Primary outcomes

  1. Force required to dislodge catheter by 1 centimeter

    Time frame: 1 study day

    This force will be measured using a dynamometer in Newtons

Secondary outcomes

  1. Force required to disrupt catheter dressing

    Time frame: 1 study day

    This force will be measured using a dynamometer in Newtons

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Duke University

Other

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2018
Primary completion
2018
Study completion
2018
First posted
Dec 15, 2017
Registry last updated
May 14, 2018

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.